|Full Text Guidelines||Summary of Changes||Scientific Publications & Appendices||Pocket Guidelines||Archive||Panel|
The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel for Urological Trauma have prepared these guidelines in order to assist medical professionals in the management of urological trauma in adults. Paediatric trauma is addressed in the EAU Paediatric Urology Guidelines .
It must be emphasised that clinical guidelines present the best evidence available to the experts but following guideline recommendations will not necessarily result in the best outcome. Guidelines can never replace clinical expertise when making treatment decisions for individual patients, but rather help to focus decisions – also taking personal values and preferences/individual circumstances of patients into account. Guidelines are not mandates and do not purport to be a legal standard of care.
The EAU Urological Trauma Guidelines Panel consists of an international group of experts, including urologists and an interventional radiologist, with particular expertise in urological trauma. All experts involved in the production of this document have submitted potential conflict of interest statements, which can be viewed on the EAU Website Uroweb: http://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-trauma/?type=panel.
A quick reference document (Pocket guidelines) is available, both in print and in a number of versions for mobile devices. These are abridged versions which may require consultation together with the full text version. A number of translated versions, alongside several scientific publications in European Urology, the Associations scientific journal, are also available [2-5]. All documents can be viewed through the EAU website: http://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-trauma/.
The Urological Trauma Guidelines were first published in 2003. Standard procedure for EAU Guidelines includes an annual assessment of newly published literature in the field to guide future updates. All sections of the 2017 Urological Trauma guidelines, with the exception of sections relating to imaging modalities, have been updated.
For the 2017 Urological Trauma Guidelines, new and relevant evidence has been identified, collated and appraised through a structured assessment of the literature. A broad and comprehensive literature search, covering all sections of the Urological Trauma Guidelines was performed. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries, covering a time frame between January 2005 and May 31st 2016. A total of 14,498 unique records were identified, retrieved and screened for relevance. A detailed search strategy is available online: http://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-trauma/?type=appendices-publications. The majority of identified publications were comprised of case reports and retrospective case series. The lack of high-powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions. The panel recognises this critical limitation.
Specific sections were updated by way of systematic reviews based on topics or questions prioritised by the Guideline Panel. These reviews were performed using standard Cochrane systematic review methodology; http://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-systematic-reviews.html.
Systematic review results included in the 2017 Urological Trauma Guidelines include:
- Is conservative/minimally-invasive management of Grade 4-5 renal trauma safe and effective compared with open surgical exploration ?
- What are the comparative outcomes of early endoscopic re-alignment versus suprapubic diversion alone for pelvic fracture related urethral injuries ?
Recommendations in this text are assessed according to their level of evidence (LE) and Guidelines are given a grade of recommendation (GR), according to a classification system modified from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence . Additional methodology information can be found in the general Methodology section of this print, and online at the EAU website: http://uroweb.org/guidelines/. A list of Associations endorsing the EAU Guidelines can also be viewed on line at the above address.
The Urological trauma Guidelines were peer reviewed prior to publication in 2015.
Trauma is defined as a physical injury or a wound to living tissue caused by an extrinsic agent. Trauma is the sixth leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 10% of all mortalities. It accounts for approximately five million deaths each year and causes disability to millions more [9,10].
About half of all deaths due to trauma are in people aged 15-45 years with trauma being the leading cause of death in this age group . Death from injury is twice as common in males, especially in relation to motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) and interpersonal violence. Trauma is therefore a serious public health problem with significant social and economic costs.
Significant variation exists in the causes and the effects of traumatic injuries between geographical areas, and between low, middle, and high-income countries. It should be noted that alcohol and drug abuse increase the rate of traumatic injuries by precipitating interpersonal violence, child and sexual abuse, and MVAs .
Genito-urinary trauma is seen in both sexes and in all age groups, but is more common in males. The kidney is the most commonly injured organ in the genito-urinary system and renal trauma is seen in up to 5% of all trauma cases [13,14], and in 10% of all abdominal trauma cases . In MVAs, renal trauma is seen after direct impact into the seatbelt or steering wheel (frontal crashes) or from body panel intrusion in side-impact crashes .
Ureteral trauma is relatively rare and mainly due to iatrogenic injuries or penetrating gunshot wounds, both in military and civilian settings .
Traumatic bladder injuries are usually due to blunt causes (MVAs) and associated with pelvic fracture , although they may also be a result of iatrogenic trauma.
The anterior urethra is most commonly injured by blunt or “fall-astride” trauma, whereas the posterior urethra is usually injured in pelvic fracture cases, the majority of which are seen in MVAs .
Genital trauma is much more common in males due to anatomical considerations, more frequent participation in physical sports, violent events and war-fighting. Of all genito-urinary injuries, a third to two thirds involve the external genitalia .
Traumatic injuries are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) into intentional (either interpersonal violence related, war-related or self-inflicted injuries), and unintentional injuries (mainly MVAs, falls, and other domestic accidents). Intentional trauma accounts for approximately half of the trauma-related deaths worldwide . A specific type of unintentional injury is iatrogenic injury which is created during therapeutic- or diagnostic procedures by healthcare personnel.
Traumatic insults are classified according to the basic mechanism of the injury into penetrating, when an object pierces the skin, and blunt injuries.
Penetrating trauma is further classified according to the velocity of the projectile into:
- high-velocity projectiles (e.g. rifle bullets - 800-1,000 m/sec);
- medium-velocity projectiles (e.g. handgun bullets - 200-300 m/sec);
- low-velocity items (e.g. knife stab).
High-velocity weapons inflict greater damage because the bullets transmit large amounts of energy to the tissues. They form a temporary expansive cavitation that immediately collapses and creates shear forces and destruction in a much larger area then the projectile tract itself. Cavity formation disrupts tissue, ruptures blood vessels and nerves, and may fracture bones away from the path of the missile. In lower velocity injuries, the damage is usually confined to the projectile tract.
Blast injury is a complex cause of trauma as it commonly includes both blunt and penetrating trauma, and may also be accompanied by a burn injury.
Several classifications are used to describe the severity and the features of a traumatic injury. The most common is the AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) injury scoring scale, which is widely used in renal trauma (see Section 188.8.131.52) http://www.aast.org/library/traumatools/injuryscoringscales.aspx . For the other urological organs, general practice is that injuries are described by their anatomical site and severity (partial/complete); therefore, the elaborated AAST tables are omitted from these guidelines.
The initial emergency assessment of a trauma patient is beyond the focus of these guidelines, and is usually carried out by emergency medicine and trauma specialised personnel. The first priority is stabilisation of the patient and treatment of associated life-threatening injuries. The initial treatment should include securing the airway, controlling external bleeding and resuscitation of shock. In many cases, physical examination is carried out during stabilisation of the patient.
A direct history is obtained from conscious patients, while witnesses and emergency personnel can provide valuable information about unconscious or seriously injured patients. In penetrating injuries, important information includes the size of the weapon in stabbings, and the type and calibre of the weapon used in gunshot wounds. The medical history should be as detailed as possible, as pre-existing organ dysfunction can have a negative effect on trauma patient outcome [22,23]. It is essential that all persons treating trauma patients are aware of the risk of hepatitis B and C infection. An infection rate of 38% was reported among males with penetrating wounds to the external genitalia . In any penetrating trauma, tetanus vaccination should be considered according to the patient’s vaccination history and the features of the wound itself (Centres for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] tetanus wound management) .
Renal trauma occurs in approximately 1-5% of all trauma cases [14,26]. Renal injuries are associated with young age and male gender, the incidence is approximately 4.9 per 100,000 of the population . Most injuries can be managed conservatively as advances in imaging and treatment strategies have decreased the need for surgical intervention and increased organ preservation [15,28,29].
Blunt mechanisms include MVAs, falls, vehicle-associated pedestrian accidents and assault . A direct blow to the flank or abdomen during sports activities is another cause. Sudden deceleration or a crush injury may result in contusion or laceration of the parenchyma or the renal hilum. In general, renal vascular injuries occur in less than 5% of blunt abdominal trauma, while isolated renal artery injury is very rare (0.05-0.08%)  and renal artery occlusion is associated with rapid deceleration injuries.
Gunshot and stab wounds represent the most common causes of penetrating injuries and tend to be more severe and less predictable than blunt trauma. In urban settings, the percentage of penetrating injuries can be 20% or higher [31,32]. Bullets have the potential for greater parenchymal destruction and are most often associated with multiple-organ injuries . Penetrating injury produces direct tissue disruption of the parenchyma, vascular pedicles, or collecting system.
The most commonly used classification system is that of the AAST  (Table 4.1.1). This validated system has clinical relevance and helps to predict the need for intervention [16,34,35]. It also predicts morbidity after blunt or penetrating injury and mortality after blunt injury .
Table 4.1.1: AAST renal injury grading scale
Description of injury
Contusion or non-expanding subcapsular haematoma
Non-expanding peri-renal haematoma
Cortical laceration < 1 cm deep without extravasation
Cortical laceration > 1 cm without urinary extravasation
Laceration: through corticomedullary junction into collecting system
Vascular: segmental renal artery or vein injury with contained haematoma, or partial vessel laceration, or vessel thrombosis
Laceration: shattered kidney
Vascular: renal pedicle or avulsion
*Advance one grade for bilateral injuries up to grade III.
Proposals for changes to the AAST classification include a sub-stratification of the intermediate grade injury into grade 4a (low-risk cases likely to be managed non-operatively) and grade 4b (high-risk cases likely to benefit from angiographic embolisation, repair or nephrectomy), based on the presence of radiographic risk factors, including peri-renal haematoma, intravascular contrast extravasation and laceration complexity , as well as a suggestion that grade 4 injuries comprise all collecting system injuries, including ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) injuries of any severity and segmental arterial and venous injuries, while grade 5 injuries should include only hilar injuries, including thrombotic events .
Vital signs should be recorded throughout the diagnostic evaluation. Possible indicators of major injury include a history of a rapid deceleration event (fall, high-speed MVAs) or a direct blow to the flank. In the early resuscitation phase, special consideration should be given to pre-existing renal disease . In patients with a solitary kidney, the entire functioning renal unit may be endangered [39,40]. Since pre-existing abnormality makes injury more likely following trauma, hydronephrosis due to UPJ abnormality, calculi, cysts and tumours may complicate a minor injury .
Physical examination may reveal an obvious penetrating trauma from a stab wound to the lower thoracic back, flanks and upper abdomen, or bullet entry or exit wounds. In stab wounds, the extent of the entrance wound may not accurately reflect the depth of penetration.
Blunt trauma to the back, flank, lower thorax or upper abdomen may result in renal injury. Flank pain, ecchymoses, abrasions, fractured ribs, abdominal distension and/or a mass and tenderness, raise the suspicion of renal involvement.
Assess haemodynamic stability upon admission.
Obtain a history from conscious patients, witnesses and rescue team personnel with regard to the time and setting of the incident.
Record past renal surgery, and known pre-existing renal abnormalities (ureteropelvic junction obstruction, large cysts, lithiasis).
*Upgraded based on panel consensus.
Urinalysis, haematocrit and baseline creatinine are the most important tests. Haematuria, either non-visible or visible is often seen, but is neither sensitive nor specific enough to differentiate between minor and major injuries .
Haematuria that is out of proportion to the history of trauma may suggest pre-existing pathology . A urine dipstick is an acceptable, reliable and rapid test to evaluate haematuria, however, the rate of false-negative results ranges from 3-10% .
Serial haematocrit determination is part of the continuous evaluation. A decrease in haematocrit and the requirement for blood transfusions are indirect signs of the rate of blood loss, and along with the patient’s response to resuscitation, are valuable in the decision-making process. However, until evaluation is complete, it will not be clear whether this is due to renal trauma and/or associated injuries. Baseline creatinine measurement reflects renal function prior to the injury. An increased creatinine level usually reflects pre-existing renal pathology.
Test for haematuria in a patient with suspected renal injury.
Measure creatinine level to identify patients with impaired renal function prior to injury.
*Upgraded based on panel consensus.
Decisions to image in suspected renal trauma are based on the mechanism of injury and clinical findings. The goals of imaging are to grade the renal injury, document pre-existing renal pathology, demonstrate presence of the contralateral kidney and identify injuries to other organs. Haemodynamic status will determine the initial imaging pathway with unstable patients potentially requiring immediate damage control laparotomy.
There is general agreement in the literature that renal imaging should be undertaken in blunt trauma if there is visible haematuria or non-visible haematuria and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) [30,46-49]. Patients with non-visible haematuria and no shock after blunt trauma have a low likelihood of concealing significant injury. Other accepted indications for renal imaging in blunt trauma are rapid deceleration injury, direct flank trauma, flank contusions, fracture of the lower ribs and fracture of the thoracolumbar spine, regardless of the presence or absence of haematuria [30,46-49].
In the setting of abdominal trauma, US is used widely to assess for the presence of haemoperitoneum. However, grey-scale US is insensitive to solid abdominal organ injury [50-52] and the American College of Radiologists (ACR) Renal Trauma guidelines considers US usually not appropriate in renal trauma .
The use of contrast enhanced US (CEUS) with microbubbles increases the sensitivity of US to solid organ injury . Its usefulness in renal injury is limited because microbubbles are not excreted into the collecting system, therefore CEUS cannot reliably demonstrate injuries to the renal pelvis or ureter. It is not widely used, although it is a possible no-radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT) in the follow-up of renal trauma [54-56].
Computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice in haemodynamically stable patients following blunt or penetrating trauma. Computed tomography is widely available, can quickly and accurately identify and grade renal injury , establish the presence of the contralateral kidney and demonstrate concurrent injuries to other organs. Integration of whole body CT into the initial management of polytrauma patients significantly increases the probability of survival . Although the AAST system of grading renal injuries is primarily based on surgical findings, there is a good correlation with CT appearances [58,59].
In the setting of isolated renal trauma, multiphase CT allows the most comprehensive assessment of the injured kidney and includes pre-contrast and post-contrast arterial, nephrographic and delayed (pyelographic) phase images. Pre-contrast images may help identify subcapsular haematomas obscured on post-contrast sequences . Administration of intravenous iodinated contrast media is essential. Concerns regarding contrast media worsening outcomes via renal parenchymal toxicity are likely unwarranted, with low rates of contrast-induced nephropathy seen in trauma patients . Arterial phase images allow assessment of vascular injury and presence of active extravasation of contrast. Nephrographic phase images optimally demonstrate parenchymal contusions and lacerations. Delayed phase imaging reliably identifies collecting system/ureteric injury . In practice, trauma patients usually undergo standardised whole body imaging protocols and multiphase imaging of the renal tract will not be routinely performed. If there is suspicion that renal injuries have not been fully evaluated, repeat renal imaging should be considered.
Intravenous pyelography (IVP)
Intravenous pyelography has been superseded by cross-sectional imaging and should only be performed when CT is not available. Intravenous pyelography can be used to confirm function of the injured kidney and presence of the contralateral kidney .
One-shot, intraoperative IVP remains a useful technique to confirm the presence of a functioning contralateral kidney in patients too unstable to undergo pre-operative imaging . The technique consists of a bolus intravenous injection of 2 mL/kg of radiographic contrast followed by a single plain film taken after ten minutes.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in renal trauma is similar to that of CT [63,64]. However, the logistical challenges of moving a trauma patient to the MRI suite and the need for MRI-safe equipment make routine evaluation of trauma patients by this imaging modality impractical.
Radionuclide scans do not play a role in the immediate evaluation of renal trauma patients.
Haemodynamic stability is the primary criterion for the management of all renal injuries. Non-operative management has become the treatment of choice for most renal injuries. In stable patients, this means supportive care with bed-rest and observation. Primary conservative management is associated with a lower rate of nephrectomies, without any increase in the immediate or long-term morbidity . Hospitalisation or prolonged observation for evaluation of possible injury after a normal abdominal CT scan, when combined with clinical judgment, is unnecessary in most cases . All grade 1 and 2 injuries, either due to blunt or penetrating trauma, can be managed non-operatively. For the treatment of grade 3 injuries, most studies support expectant treatment [67-69].
Most patients with grade 4 and 5 injuries present with major associated injuries, and consequently often undergo exploration and nephrectomy , although emerging data indicate that many of these patients can be managed safely with an expectant approach . An initially conservative approach is feasible in stable patients with devitalised fragments , although these injuries are associated with an increased rate of complications and late surgery . Patients diagnosed with urinary extravasation from solitary injuries can be managed without major intervention with a resolution rate of > 90% [71,74]. Similarly, unilateral main arterial injuries are normally managed non-operatively in a haemodynamically stable patient with surgical repair reserved for bilateral artery injuries or injuries involving a solitary functional kidney. Conservative management is also advised in the treatment of unilateral complete blunt arterial thrombosis. However, a blunt arterial thrombosis in multiple trauma patients is usually associated with severe injuries and attempts at repair are usually unsuccessful .
Penetrating wounds have traditionally been approached surgically. A systematic approach based on clinical, laboratory and radiological evaluation minimises the incidence of negative exploration without increasing morbidity from a missed injury . Selective non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds is generally accepted following complete staging in stable patients [69,77]. If the site of penetration by the stab wound is posterior to the anterior axillary line, 88% of such injuries can be managed non-operatively . Stab wounds producing major renal injuries (grade 3 or higher) are more unpredictable and are associated with a higher rate of delayed complications if treated expectantly .
Isolated grade 4 injuries represent a unique situation where treatment of the patient is based solely on the extent of the renal injury. Gunshot injuries should be explored only if they involve the hilum or are accompanied by signs of ongoing bleeding, ureteral injuries, or renal pelvis lacerations . Minor low-velocity gunshot and stab wounds may be managed conservatively with an acceptably good outcome . In contrast, tissue damage due to high-velocity gunshot injuries can be more extensive and nephrectomy may be required. Non-operative management of penetrating injuries in selected stable patients is associated with a successful outcome in approximately 50% of stab wounds and up to 40% of gunshot wounds [82-84].
Angioembolisation has a central role in the non-operative management of blunt renal trauma in haemodynamically stable patients [85-87]. Currently there are no validated criteria to identify patients who require angioembolisation and its use in renal trauma remains heterogeneous. Generally, accepted CT findings indicating angioembolisation are active extravasation of contrast, arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysm . The presence of both active extravasation of contrast and a large haematoma (> 25 mm depth) predict the need for angioembolisation with good accuracy [88,89]. Angioembolisation has been utilised in the non-operative management of all grades of renal injury, however it is likely to be most beneficial in the setting of high grade renal trauma (AAST > 3) [85-87]. Non-operative management of high-grade renal trauma, where angioembolisation is included in the management algorithm, can be successful in up to 94.9% of grade 3, 89% of grade 4 and 52% of grade 5 injuries [85,86]. Increasing grade of renal injury is associated with increased risk of failed angioembolisation and need for repeat intervention . Repeat embolisation prevents nephrectomy in 67% of patients and open surgery after failed embolisation usually results in nephrectomy [90,91]. Despite concerns regarding parenchymal infarction and the use of iodinated contrast media, there is evidence to suggest angioembolisation does not affect the occurrence or course of acute kidney injury following renal trauma . In severe polytrauma or high operative risk, the main artery may be embolised, either as a definitive treatment or to be followed by interval nephrectomy.
Available evidence regarding angioembolisation in penetrating renal trauma is sparse. One older study found angioembolisation is three times more likely to fail in penetrating trauma . However, angioembolisation has been used successfully to treat arteriovenous fistulae and psuedoaneurysms in the non-operative management of penetrating renal trauma . With studies reporting successful non-operative management of penetrating renal trauma, angioembolisation must be critically considered in this setting [93,94].
The need for renal exploration can be predicted by considering the type of injury, transfusion requirements, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and injury grade . However, management of renal injury may also be influenced by the decision to explore or observe associated abdominal injuries . Continuing haemodynamic instability and unresponsiveness to aggressive resuscitation due to renal haemorrhage is an indication for exploration, irrespective of the mode of injury [76,97]. Other indications include an expanding or pulsatile peri-renal haematoma, identified at exploratory laparotomy, performed for associated injuries. Persistent extravasation or urinoma are usually managed successfully with endo-urological techniques. Inconclusive imaging and a pre-existing abnormality or an incidentally diagnosed tumour may require surgery even after minor renal injury .
Grade 5 vascular injuries are regarded as an absolute indication for exploration, but parenchymal grade 5 patients who are stable at presentation may be safely treated conservatively [98-101]. In these patients, intervention is predicted by the need for continued fluid and blood resuscitation, peri-renal haematoma size > 3.5 cm and the presence of intravascular contrast extravasation .
The overall exploration rate for blunt trauma is less than 10% , and may be even lower, as the conservative approach is increasingly adopted . The goals of exploration following renal trauma are control of haemorrhage and renal salvage.
Most series suggest the transperitoneal approach for surgery [103,104]. Access to the pedicle is obtained either through the posterior parietal peritoneum, which is incised over the aorta, just medial to the inferior mesenteric vein or by bluntly dissecting along the plane of the psoas muscle fascia, adjacent to the great vessels, and directly placing a vascular clamp on the hilum . Stable haematomas detected during exploration for associated injuries should not be opened. Central or expanding haematomas indicate injuries of the renal pedicle, aorta, or vena cava and are potentially life-threatening .
In cases with unilateral arterial intimal disruption, repair can be delayed, especially in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney. However, prolonged warm ischaemia usually results in irreparable damage and renal loss. Entering the retroperitoneum and leaving the confined haematoma undisturbed within the perinephric fascia is recommended unless it is violated and cortical bleeding is noted; temporarily packing the fossa tightly with laparotomy pads can salvage the kidney . Haemorrhage can occur while the patient is resuscitated, warmed, and awaits re-exploration, however, careful monitoring is sufficient. A brief period of controlled local urinary extravasation is unlikely to result in a significant adverse event or impact overall recovery. During the following 48 to 72 hours, CT scans can identify injuries and select patients for reconstruction or continued expectant management . Ureteral stenting or nephrostomy diversion should be considered after delayed reconstruction due to the increased risk of post-operative urinary extravasation.
Feasibility of renal reconstruction should be judged during the operation. The overall rate of patients who undergo a nephrectomy during exploration is approximately 13%, usually in patients with penetrating injuries and higher rates of transfusion requirements, haemodynamic instability, and higher injury severity scores . Other intra-abdominal injuries also slightly increase the need for nephrectomy . Mortality is associated with overall severity of the injury and not often a consequence of the renal injury itself . In gunshot injuries caused by a high-velocity bullet, reconstruction can be difficult and nephrectomy is often required . Renorrhaphy is the most common reconstructive technique. Partial nephrectomy is required when non-viable tissue is detected. Watertight closure of the collecting system, if open, is desirable, although closing the parenchyma over the injured collecting system also has good results. If the capsule is not preserved, an omental pedicle flap or peri-renal fat bolster may be used for coverage . The use of haemostatic agents and sealants in reconstruction can be helpful . In all cases, drainage of the ipsilateral retroperitoneum is recommended. Following blunt trauma, repair of vascular injuries (grade 5) is seldom, if ever, effective . Repair should be attempted in patients with a solitary kidney or bilateral injuries , but not in the presence of a functioning contralateral kidney . Nephrectomy for main artery injury has outcomes similar to those of vascular repair and does not worsen post-treatment renal function in the short-term.
Manage stable patients with blunt renal trauma conservatively with close monitoring of vital signs.
Manage isolated grade 1-3 stab and low-velocity gunshot wounds in stable patients, expectantly.
Treat patients with active bleeding from renal injury, but without other indications for immediate abdominal operation, with angioembolisation.
Proceed with renal exploration in the presence of persistent haemodynamic instability, expanding or pulsatile peri-renal haematoma, grade 5 vascular injury or in case of exploration for associated injuries.
Attempt renal reconstruction if haemorrhage is controlled and there is sufficient viable renal parenchyma.
The risk of complications in patients who have been treated conservatively increases with injury grade. Repeat imaging two to four days after trauma minimises the risk of missed complications, especially in grade 3-5 blunt injuries . The usefulness of frequent CT scanning after injury has never been satisfactorily proven. Computed tomography scans should always be performed on patients with fever, unexplained decreased haematocrit or significant flank pain. Repeat imaging can be safely omitted for patients with grade 1-4 injuries as long as they remain clinically well .
Nuclear scans are useful for documenting and tracking functional recovery following renal reconstruction . Follow-up should involve physical examination, urinalysis, individualised radiological investigation, serial blood pressure measurement and serum determination of renal function . A decline in renal function correlates directly with injury grade; this is independent of the mechanism of injury and the method of management [120,121]. Follow-up examinations should continue until healing is documented and laboratory findings have stabilised, although checking for latent renovascular hypertension may need to continue for years . In general, the literature is highly limited on the long-term consequences of renal tissue trauma.
Early complications, occurring less than one month after injury, include bleeding, infection, perinephric abscess, sepsis, urinary fistula, hypertension, urinary extravasation and urinoma. Delayed complications include bleeding, hydronephrosis, calculus formation, chronic pyelonephritis, hypertension, arteriovenous fistula, hydronephrosis and pseudo-aneurysms. Delayed retroperitoneal bleeding may be life-threatening and selective angiographic embolisation is the preferred treatment . Perinephric abscess formation is best managed by percutaneous drainage, although open drainage may sometimes be required. Percutaneous management of complications may pose less risk of renal loss than re-operation, when infected tissues make reconstruction difficult .
Renal trauma is a rare cause of hypertension, and is mostly observed in young men. The frequency of post-traumatic hypertension is estimated to be less than 5% [124,125]. Hypertension may occur acutely as a result of external compression from peri-renal haematoma (Page kidney), or chronically due to compressive scar formation. Renin-mediated hypertension may occur as a long-term complication, aetiologies include renal artery thrombosis, segmental arterial thrombosis, renal artery stenosis (Goldblatt kidney), devitalised fragments and arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). Arteriography is informative in cases of post-traumatic hypertension. Treatment is required if the hypertension persists and could include medical management, excision of the ischaemic parenchymal segment, vascular reconstruction, or total nephrectomy .
Urinary extravasation after reconstruction often subsides without intervention as long as ureteral obstruction and infection are not present. Ureteral retrograde stenting may improve drainage and allow healing . Persistent urinary extravasation from an otherwise viable kidney after blunt trauma often responds to stent placement and/or percutaneous drainage .
Arteriovenous fistulae usually present with delayed onset of significant haematuria, most often after penetrating trauma. Percutaneous embolisation is often effective for symptomatic AVF, but larger ones may require surgery . Post-procedural complications include infection, sepsis, urinary fistula, and renal infarction . The development of pseudo-aneurysm is a rare complication following blunt trauma. In numerous case reports, transcatheter embolisation appears to be a reliable minimally invasive solution . Acute renal colic from a retained missile has been reported, and should be managed endoscopically, if possible .
Repeat imaging in case of fever, worsening flank pain, or falling haematocrit.
Follow-up approximately three months after major renal injury with physical examination, urinalysis, individualised radiological investigation, including nuclear scintigraphy, serial blood pressure measurements and renal function tests.
Iatrogenic renal trauma is rare, but can lead to significant morbidity.
The commonest causes of iatrogenic renal injuries are listed in Table 4.1.2 .
Table 4.1.2: Incidence and aetiology of commonest iatrogenic renal trauma during various procedures
Laparoscopic surgery (oncology)
Open surgery (oncology)
AVF=arteriovenous fistulae; PCNL=percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Large haematomas after biopsy (0.5-1.5%) are caused by laceration or arterial damage . Renal artery and intraparenchymal pseudo-aneurysms (0.9%) may be caused by percutaneous biopsy, nephrostomy, and partial nephrectomy (0.43%) . In percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), haemorrhage is the most dangerous iatrogenic renal trauma, especially when punctures are too medial or directly entering the renal pelvis. Other injuries include AVF or a tear in the pelvicaliceal system.
Iatrogenic renal injuries associated with renal transplantation include AVF, intrarenal pseudo-aneurysms, arterial dissection and arteriocaliceal fistulas. Pseudo-aneurysm is a rare complication of allograft biopsy. Although the overall complication rate following biopsy in transplanted kidneys is 9% (including haematoma, AVF, visible haematuria and infection), vascular complications requiring intervention account for 0.2-2.0% . Predisposing factors include hypertension, renal medullary disease, central biopsies, and numerous needle passes . Arteriovenous fistulae and pseudo-aneurysms can occur in 1-18% of allograft biopsies .
Extra-renal pseudo-aneurysms after transplantation procedures generally occur at the anastomosis, in association with local or haematogenous infection. Arterial dissection related to transplantation is rare and presents in the early post-operative period .
Iatrogenic renal trauma associated with endopyelotomy is classified as major (vascular injury), and minor (urinoma) . Patients undergoing cryoablation for small masses via the percutaneous or the laparoscopic approach may have asymptomatic perinephric haematoma and self-limiting urine leakage.
Vascular injury is a rare complication (1.6%) of endovascular interventions in contrast to patients with surgical injuries. The renal vessels are vulnerable mainly during oncological procedures . Renal foreign bodies, with retained sponges or wires during open or endo-urological procedures, are uncommon.
Haematuria is common after insertion of nephrostomies, but massive retroperitoneal haemorrhage is rare. Following percutaneous biopsy, AVF may occur with severe hypertension. A pseudo-aneurysm should be suspected if the patient presents with flank pain and decreasing haematocrit, even in the absence of haematuria.
During PCNL, acute bleeding may be caused by injury to the anterior or posterior segmental arteries, whilst late post-operative bleeding may be caused by interlobar and lower-pole arterial lesions, AVF and post-traumatic aneurysms . Duplex US and CT angiography can be used to diagnose vascular injuries. A close watch on irrigation fluid input and output is required to ensure early recognition of fluid extravasation. Intra-operative evaluation of serum electrolytes, acid-base status, oxygenation, and monitoring of airway pressure are good indicators of this complication.
In arterial dissection related to transplantation, symptoms include anuria and a prolonged dependence on dialysis. Doppler US can demonstrate compromised arterial flow. Dissection can lead to thrombosis of the renal artery and/or vein.
After angioplasty and stent-graft placement in the renal artery, during which wire or catheters may enter the parenchyma and penetrate through the capsule, possible radiological findings include AVF, pseudo-aneurysm, arterial dissection and contrast extravasation. Common symptoms of pseudo-aneurysms are flank pain and visible haematuria within two or three weeks after surgery . Transplant AVF and pseudo-aneurysms may be asymptomatic or may cause visible haematuria or hypovolemia due to shunting and the ‘steal’ phenomenon, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and high output cardiac failure.
Patients with extrarenal pseudo-aneurysms (post-transplantation) may present with infection/ bleeding, swelling, pain and intermittent claudication. Doppler US findings for AVFs include high-velocity, low-resistance, spectral waveforms, with focal areas of disorganised colour flow outside the normal vascular borders, and possibly a dilated vein . Pseudo-aneurysms appear on US as anechoic cysts, with intracystic flow on colour Doppler US.
Potential complications of retained sponges include abscess formation, fistula formation to the skin or intestinal tract, and sepsis. Retained sponges may look like pseudo-tumours or appear as solid masses. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly shows the characteristic features . Absorbable haemostatic agents may also produce a foreign body giant cell reaction, but the imaging characteristics are not specific. Retained stents, wires, or fractured Acucise cutting wires may also present as foreign bodies and can serve as a nidus for stone formation .
If a nephrostomy catheter appears to transfix the renal pelvis, significant arterial injury is possible. The misplaced catheter should be withdrawn and embolisation may rapidly arrest the haemorrhage. Computed tomograpghy can also successfully guide repositioning of the catheter into the collecting system . Small subcapsular haematomas after insertion of nephrostomies resolve spontaneously, whilst AVFs are best managed by embolisation. AVF and pseudo-aneurysms after biopsy are also managed by embolisation .
During PCNL, bleeding can be venous or arterial. In major venous trauma with haemorrhage, patients with concomitant renal insufficiency can be treated without open exploration or angiographic embolisation using a Council-tip balloon catheter . In the case of profuse bleeding at the end of a PCNL, conservative management is usually effective. The patient should be placed in the supine position, clamping the nephrostomy catheter and forcing diuresis. Super-selective embolisation is required in less than 1% of cases and has proved effective in more than 90% . Short-term deleterious effects are more pronounced in patients with a solitary kidney, but long-term follow-up shows functional and morphological improvements . Termination of PCNL if the renal pelvis is torn or ruptured is a safe choice. Management requires close monitoring, placement of an abdominal or retroperitoneal drain and supportive measures . Most surgical venous injuries include partial lacerations that can be managed with various techniques, such as venorrhaphy, patch angioplasty with autologous vein, or an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft . If conservative measures fail in cases of pseudo-aneurysm and clinical symptoms or a relevant decrease in haemoglobin occurs, transarterial embolisation should be considered . As the success rate is similar for initial and repeat interventions, a repeat intervention is justified when the clinical course allows this .
Traditionally, patients with post-operative haemorrhage following intra-abdominal laparoscopic surgery of the kidney require laparotomy. Pseudo-aneurysms and AVF are uncommon after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy, but can lead to significant morbidity. Temporary haemostasis occurs with coagulation and/or tamponade, but later degradation of the clot, connection with the extravascular space, and possible fistula formation within the collecting system may develop. Patients typically present with visible haematuria, even though they may also experience flank pain, dizziness and fever. Embolisation is the reference standard for both diagnosis and treatment in the acute setting, although CT can be used if the symptoms are not severe and/or the diagnosis is ambiguous. Reports have described good preservation of renal function after embolisation .
Endoluminal management after renal transplantation consists of stabilising the intimal flap with stent placement. Embolisation is the treatment of choice for a symptomatic transplant AVF or enlarging pseudo-aneurysm . Super-selective embolisation with a coaxial catheter and metallic coils helps to limit the loss of normal functioning graft tissue . Failure of embolisation is associated with a high nephrectomy rate. The long-term outcome depends on the course of the transplant and the amount of contrast medium used during the procedure.
Surgical treatment for AVF consists of partial or total nephrectomy or arterial ligation, which results in loss of part of the transplant or the entire transplant. To date, surgery has been the main approach in the treatment of renal vascular injuries. In patients with retroperitoneal haematoma, AVF, and haemorrhagic shock, interventional therapy is associated with a lower level of risk compared to surgery . Renal arteriography followed by selective embolisation can confirm the injury. In injuries during angioplasty and stent-graft placement, transcatheter embolisation is the first choice of treatment . The treatment for acute iatrogenic rupture of the main renal artery is balloon tamponade. If this fails, immediate availability of a stent graft is vital . The true nature of lesions caused by foreign bodies is revealed after exploration.
Summary of evidence
Iatrogenic renal injuries are procedure-dependent (1.8-15%).
Significant injury requiring intervention is rare.
The most common injuries are vascular.
Renal allografts are more susceptible.
Injuries occurring during surgery are rectified immediately.
Symptoms suggestive of a significant injury require investigation.
Repeat imaging in case of fever, worsening flank pain, or falling haematocrit.
Follow-up approximately three months after major renal injury with physical examination, urinalysis, individualised radiological investigation, including nuclear scintigraphy, serial blood pressure measurements and renal function tests.
Figures 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 show the suggested treatment for blunt and penetrating renal injuries in adults.
Figure 4.1.1 Evaluation of blunt renal trauma in adults
* Suspected renal trauma results from reported mechanism of injury and physical examination.
† Renal imaging: CT scans are the gold standard for evaluating blunt and penetrating renal injuries in stable patients. In settings where CT is not available, the urologist should rely on other imaging modalities (IVP, angiography, radiographic scintigraphy, MRI).
‡ Renal exploration: Although renal salvage is a primary goal for the urologist, decisions concerning the viability of the organ and the type of reconstruction are made during the operation.
CT=computed tomography; Ht=haematocrit; IVP=intravenous pyelography.
Figure 4.1.2 Evaluation of penetrating renal trauma in adults
* Suspected renal trauma results from reported mechanism of injury and physical examination.
† Renal imaging: CT scans are the gold standard for evaluating blunt and penetrating renal injuries in stable patients. In settings where CT is not available, the urologist should rely on other imaging modalities (IVP, angiography, radiographic scintigraphy, MRI).
‡ Renal exploration: Although renal salvage is a primary goal for the urologist, decisions concerning the viability of the organ and the type of reconstruction are made during the operation.
CT=computed tomography; Ht=haematocrit.
Trauma to the ureters is relatively rare as they are protected from injury by their small size, mobility, and the adjacent vertebrae, bony pelvis and muscles. Iatrogenic trauma is the commonest cause of ureteral injury (approximately 80%) . It is seen in open, laparoscopic or endoscopic surgery and is often missed intra-operatively. Any trauma to the ureter may result in severe sequelae.
Overall, ureteral trauma accounts for 1-2.5% of urinary tract trauma [17,160-162], with even higher rates in modern combat injuries . Penetrating external ureteral trauma, mainly caused by gunshot wounds, dominates most of the modern series, both civilian and military [17,160,164]. About one-third of cases of external trauma to the ureters are caused by blunt trauma, mostly road traffic injuries [161,162].
Ureteral injury should be suspected in all cases of penetrating abdominal injury, especially gunshot wounds, as it occurs in 2-3% of cases . It should also be suspected in blunt trauma with a deceleration mechanism, as the renal pelvis can be torn away from the ureter . The distribution of external ureteral injuries along the ureter varies between series, but it is more common in the upper ureter [17,161,162].
Iatrogenic ureteral trauma can result from various mechanisms: ligation or kinking with a suture, crushing from a clamp, partial or complete transection, thermal injury, or ischaemia from devascularisation [164-166]. It usually involves damage to the lower ureter [160,164,165,167]. Gynaecological operations are the commonest cause of iatrogenic trauma to the ureters (Table 4.2.1), but it may also occur in colorectal operations, especially abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection . The incidence of urological iatrogenic trauma has decreased in the last twenty years [164,169] due to improvements in technique, instruments and surgical experience.
Risk factors for iatrogenic trauma include conditions that alter the normal anatomy, e.g. advanced malignancy, prior surgery or irradiation, diverticulitis, endometriosis, anatomical abnormalities, and major haemorrhage [164,168,170]. Occult ureteral injury occurs more often than reported and not all injuries are diagnosed intra-operatively. In gynaecological surgery, if routine intra-operative cystoscopy is used, the detection rate of ureteral trauma is five times higher than usually reported [170,171].
Table 4.2.1: Incidence of ureteral injury in various procedures
0.02 – 0.5
0.03 – 2.0
0.2 – 6.0
1.7 – 3.0
0.15 – 10
0.3 – 4.1
0.2 – 2.0
0 – 0.3
Radical prostatectomy 
0.05 – 1.6
0.05 – 0.4
The diagnosis of ureteral trauma is challenging, therefore, a high index of suspicion should be maintained. In penetrating external trauma, it is usually made intra-operatively during laparotomy , while it is delayed in most blunt trauma and iatrogenic cases [164,167,176].
External ureteral trauma usually accompanies severe abdominal and pelvic injuries. Penetrating trauma is usually associated with vascular and intestinal injuries, while blunt trauma is associated with damage to the pelvic bones and lumbosacral spine injuries [161,162]. Haematuria is an unreliable and poor indicator of ureteral injury, as it is present in only 50-75% of patients [160,164,177].
Iatrogenic injury may be noticed during the primary procedure, when intravenous dye (e.g. indigo carmine) is injected to exclude ureteral injury. However, it is usually noticed later, when it is discovered by subsequent evidence of upper tract obstruction, urinary fistulae formation or sepsis. The following clinical signs are characteristic of delayed diagnosis flank pain, urinary incontinence, vaginal or drain urinary leakage, haematuria, fever, uraemia or urinoma. When the diagnosis is missed, the complication rate increases [160,163,176]. Early recognition facilitates immediate repair and provides better outcome [172,178].
Extravasation of contrast medium on CT is the hallmark sign of ureteral trauma. However, hydronephrosis, ascites, urinoma or mild ureteral dilation are often the only signs. In unclear cases, a retrograde or antegrade urography is the optimum standard for confirmation . Intravenous pyelography, especially one-shot IVP, is unreliable in diagnosis, as it is negative in up to 60% of patients [160,164].
The prevention of iatrogenic trauma to the ureters depends upon the visual identification of the ureters and careful intra-operative dissection in their proximity [164-166]. The use of prophylactic pre-operative ureteral stent insertion assists in visualisation and palpation and is often used in complicated cases (about 4% in a large cohort) . It is probably also advantageous in making it easier to detect ureteral injury  however, it does not decrease the rate of injury . Apart from its evident disadvantages (potential complications and cost), a stent may alter the location of the ureter and diminish its flexibility [165,173]. Routine prophylactic
stenting is generally not cost-effective . Another form of secondary prevention is intra-operative cystoscopy after intravenous dye injection, which can provide confirmation of ureteral patency . Routine cystoscopy has minimal risks and can markedly increase the rate of ureteral injury detection .
Management of a ureteral trauma depends on many factors concerning the nature, severity and location of the injury. Immediate diagnosis of a ligation injury during an operation can be managed by de-ligation and stent placement. Partial injuries can be repaired immediately with a stent or urine diversion by a nephrostomy tube. Stenting is helpful because it provides canalisation and may decrease the risk of stricture . On the other hand, its insertion has to be weighed against potentially aggravating the severity of the ureteral injury. Immediate repair of ureteral injury is usually advisable. However, in cases of unstable trauma patients, a ‘damage control’ approach is preferred with ligation of the ureter, diversion of the urine (e.g. by a nephrostomy), and a delayed definitive repair . Injuries that are diagnosed late are usually treated first by a nephrostomy tube with or without a stent .
Endo-urological treatment of delayed-diagnosed ureteral injuries by internal stenting, with or without dilatation, is the first step in most cases. It is performed either retrogradely or antegradely through a PCN, and it has a variable success rate of 14 to 89% in published series [181-183]. An open surgical repair is necessary in case of failure. The basic principles for any surgical repair of a ureteral injury are outlined in Table 4.2.2. Wide debridement is highly recommended for gunshot wound injuries due to the ‘blast effect’ of the injury.
Injuries shorter than 2-3 cm can usually be managed by a primary uretero-ureterostomy . When this approach is not feasible, a uretero-calycostomy should be considered. In extensive ureteral loss, a transuretero-ureterostomy is a valid option, where the proximal stump of the ureter is transposed across the midline and anastomosed to the contralateral ureter. The reported stenosis rate is 4% and intervention or revision occur in 10% of cases .
Distal injuries are best managed by ureteral re-implantation (uretero-neocystostomy) because the primary trauma usually jeopardises the blood supply to the distal ureter. The question of refluxing vs. non-refluxing ureteral re-implantation remains unresolved in the literature. The risk for clinically significant reflux should be weighed against the risk for ureteral obstruction.
A psoas hitch between the bladder and the ipsilateral psoas tendon is usually needed to bridge the gap and to protect the anastomosis from tension. The contralateral superior vesical pedicle may be divided to improve bladder mobility. The reported success rate is very high (97%) . In extensive mid-lower ureteral injury, the large gap can be bridged with a tubularised L-shaped bladder flap (Boari flap). It is a time-consuming operation and not usually suitable in the acute setting. The success rate is reported to be 81-88% .
A longer ureteral injury can be replaced using a segment of the intestines, usually the ileum (ileal interposition graft). This should be avoided in patients with impaired renal function or known intestinal disease. Follow-up should include serum chemistry to diagnose hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis . The long-term complications include anastomotic stricture (3%) and fistulae (6%) . In cases of extensive ureteral loss or after multiple attempts at ureteral repair, the kidney can be relocated to the pelvis (autotransplantation). The renal vessels are anastomosed to the iliac vessels and a ureteral re-implantation is performed .
Table 4.2.2: Principles of surgical repair of ureteral injury
Debridement of necrotic tissue.
Spatulation of ureteral ends.
Watertight mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis with absorbable sutures.
Isolation of injury with peritoneum or omentum.
Table 4.2.3: Reconstruction option by site of injury
Site of injury
Ureteral re-implantation and a Boari flap
Ureteral re-implantation with a psoas hitch
Ileal interposition graft
Summary of evidence
Iatrogenic ureteral trauma gives rise to the commonest cause of ureteral injury.
Gunshot wounds account for the majority of penetrating ureteral injuries, while MVAs account for most blunt injuries.
Ureteral trauma usually accompanies severe abdominal and pelvic injuries.
Haematuria is an unreliable and poor indicator of ureteral injury.
The diagnosis of ureteral trauma is often delayed.
Pre-operative prophylactic stents do not prevent ureteral injury, but may assist in its detection.
Endo-urological treatment of small ureteral fistulae and strictures is safe and effective.
Major ureteral injury requires ureteral reconstruction following temporary urinary diversion.
Visually identify the ureters to prevent ureteral trauma during abdominal and pelvic surgery.
Beware of concomitant ureteral injury in all abdominal penetrating trauma, and in deceleration-type blunt trauma.
Use pre-operative prophylactic stents in high-risk cases.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
The AAST proposes a classification of bladder trauma, based on the extent and location of the injury . Practically the location of the bladder injury is important as it will guide further management (Table 4.3.1) :
- combined intra-extraperitoneal.
Table 4.3.1: Classification of bladder trauma based on mode of action
Motor vehicle traffic collisions are the most common cause of blunt bladder injury, followed by falls, industrial trauma/pelvic crush injuries and blows to the lower abdomen [161,189,191]. Between 60-90% of patients with bladder injuries caused by blunt trauma have associated pelvic fractures, and 44-68.5% of patients with bladder injuries have at least one other intra-abdominal injury [192,193]. Pelvic fractures are associated with bladder injuries in only 3.6% of cases . The incidence of extraperitoneal (34.2-86%) and intraperitoneal (14-50%) injuries varies among series [189,192,193]. A combination of bladder and urethral injury is present in 10-20% of cases [190,193].
Extraperitoneal ruptures are almost always associated with pelvic fractures [191,193]. The injury is usually caused by distortion of the pelvic ring, with shearing of the anterolateral bladder wall near the bladder base (at its fascial attachments), or by a ‘counter-coup’ that bursts opposite the fracture site. Occasionally, the bladder is directly perforated by a sharp bony fragment . The highest risk of bladder injury was found in disruptions of the pelvic circle with displacement > 1 cm, diastasis of the pubic symphysis > 1 cm and pubic rami fractures [161,190]. An isolated acetabular fracture is not likely to be associated with bladder injury [190,193].
Intraperitoneal ruptures are caused by a sudden rise in intravesical pressure of a distended bladder, secondary to a blow to the pelvis or lower abdomen. The bladder dome is the weakest point of the bladder and ruptures will usually occur there . Penetrating injuries, mainly gunshot wounds, are rare except in conflict regions and some urban settings [189,194,195]. Improvised explosive devices are at present the main cause of combat related bladder injuries in asymmetric warfare .
The bladder is the urological organ that most often suffers iatrogenic injury . Table 4.3.2 shows the incidence of IBT during various procedures.
Table 4.3.2: Incidence of IBT during various procedures
Caesarean delivery 
Abdominal radical hysterectomy  (malignant)
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy  (malignant)
Robotic radical hysterectomy  (malignant)
Laparoscopic hysterectomy  (benign)
Vaginal hysterectomy  (benign)
Abdominal hysterectomy  (benign)
Small/large bowel procedures 
Rectal procedures 
Abdominal cytoreductive surgery 
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair 
Retropubic male sling 
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy 
Midurethral sling (Transobturator route) 
Midurethral sling (Retropubic route) 
Pubovaginal sling 
Transvaginal mesh surgery 
Native tissue colporrhaphy 
External IBT occurs most often during obstetric and gynaecological procedures, followed by general surgical and urological interventions . Main risk factors are previous surgery, inflammation and malignancy .
Internal IBT mainly occurs during TURB. Reported risk factors are larger tumours, older age, pre-treated bladders (previous TURB, intravesical instillations) and location at the bladder dome [211,212]. There is conflicting evidence whether bipolar TURB can reduce the risk of bladder perforation due to obturator jerk for tumours at the lateral wall [213,214]. Perforations requiring intervention are rare (0.16-0.57%) . Extraperitoneal perforations are more frequent than intraperitoneal perforations [212,215].
Intravesical foreign bodies include:
- retained parts of endo-urologic equipment such as resectoscopes, ureteric stents or bladder catheters;
- forgotten pieces of surgical gauze, sutures or staples used in pelvic procedures ;
- an unrecognised perforation or erosion of mesh used for correction of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse .
The principal sign of bladder injury is visible haematuria [190,191]. Non-iatrogenic bladder injury is strongly correlated with a combination of pelvic fracture and visible haematuria, and this combination is an absolute indication for further imaging . Further imaging is also indicated in case of non-visible haematuria associated with either disruption of the pelvic circle with displacement > 1 cm or diastasis of the pubic symphysis > 1 cm and in case of posterior urethral injury . In the absence of these absolute indications, the decision for further imaging should be based on the presence of other clinical signs and symptoms  which are summarised in Table 4.3.3.
Table 4.3.3: Clinical signs and symptoms of bladder injury
Signs and symptoms
Inability to void 
Abdominal distension 
In the case of urinary ascites
Uraemia and elevated creatinine level 
Intraperitoneal rupture=> re-absorption of urea nitrogen and creatinine
Inadequate urinary output 
In penetrating injuries
Signs of external IBT are extravasation of urine, visible laceration, clear fluid in the surgical field, appearance of the bladder catheter, and blood and/or gas in the urine bag during laparoscopy . Direct inspection is the most reliable method of assessing bladder integrity . Intravesical instillation of methylene blue may be helpful to detect smaller lesions . If bladder perforation is close to the trigone, the ureteric orifices should be inspected [197,198].
Internal IBT is suggested by cystoscopic identification of fatty tissue, a dark space between detrusor muscle fibres, or the visualisation of bowel . Signs of major perforation are the inability to distend the bladder, a low return of irrigation fluid, and abdominal distension .
Clinical signs and symptoms of an iatrogenic bladder trauma not recognised during surgery include haematuria, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, ileus, peritonitis, sepsis, urine leakage from the wound, decreased urinary output, and increased serum creatinine [197,198]. An IBT during hysterectomy or caesarean delivery can be complicated by respective vesico-vaginal or vesico-uterine fistula [198,221].
Symptoms of an intravesical foreign body include dysuria, recurrent urinary tract infection, frequency, urgency, haematuria, and perineal/pelvic pain . Bladder calculi may develop with chronic intravesical mesh exposure .
Cystography is the preferred diagnostic modality for non-iatrogenic bladder injury and for a suspected IBT in the post-operative setting [221,222]. Both plain and CT cystography have a comparable sensitivity (90-95%) and specificity (100%) [191,223]. However, CT cystography is superior in the identification of bony fragments in the bladder and bladder neck injuries as well as other abdominal injuries [190,193].
With intraperitoneal extravasation, free contrast medium is visualised in the abdomen, highlighting bowel loops and/or outlining abdominal viscera such as the liver . Extraperitoneal bladder injury is associated with flame-shaped areas of contrast extravasation in the peri-vesical soft tissues. Contrast medium in the vagina is a sign of vesico-vaginal fistula .
Cystoscopy is the preferred method for detection of intra-operative bladder injuries, as it may directly visualise the laceration. Cystoscopy can localise the lesion in relation to the position of the trigone and ureteral orifices . A lack of bladder distension during cystoscopy suggests a large perforation.
Cystoscopy is recommended to detect perforation of the bladder (or urethra) following suburethral sling operations by the retropubic route . Routine intra-operative cystoscopy during benign gynaecologic procedures significantly increases the intra-operative detection rate, however the post-operative detection rate remains unaffected . Based on these findings, routine cystoscopy during benign gynaecologic procedures cannot be generally recommended, although the threshold to perform it should be low in case of suspicion of bladder injury. Cystoscopy is also preferred to diagnose a foreign body [216,217].
Passive bladder filling by clamping the urinary catheter during the excretory phase of CT or IVP is not sufficient to exclude bladder injury .
Demonstration of intraperitoneal fluid or an extraperitoneal collection suggests intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal perforation, respectively. However, US alone is insufficient in the diagnosis of bladder trauma.
The risk of bladder injury is reduced by emptying the bladder by urethral catheterisation in every procedure where the bladder is at risk [219,226]. Furthermore, the balloon of the catheter can aid in identification of the bladder . For tumours at the lateral wall, obturator nerve block or general anesthesia with adequate muscle relaxation can reduce the incidence of internal IBT during TURB . The use of combat pelvic protection systems reduces the risk of bladder and other genito-urinary injuries due to the blast mechanism of improvised explosive devices [196,227].
Conservative treatment comprises clinical observation, continuous bladder drainage and antibiotic prophylaxis . This is the standard treatment for an uncomplicated extraperitoneal injury due to blunt trauma [190,193], after TURB or after other operations in which the injury was not recognised during surgery .
It is also an option for an uncomplicated intraperitoneal injury after TURB or after other operations in which the injury was not recognised during surgery, but only in the absence of peritonitis and ileus [210,224]. In addition to conservative treatment, placement of an intraperitoneal drain is advocated, especially when the lesion is larger [220,228].
Although most extraperitoneal ruptures can be treated conservatively, bladder neck involvement, bone fragments in the bladder wall, concomitant rectal or vaginal injury or entrapment of the bladder wall will necessitate surgical intervention . There is an increasing trend to treat pelvic ring fractures with open stabilisation and internal fixation with osteosynthetic material. During this procedure, an extraperitoneal rupture should be sutured concomitantly in order to reduce the risk of infection [190,191]. Similarly, during surgical exploration for other injuries, an extraperitoneal rupture should be sutured concomitantly in order to reduce infective complications [189,191,192].
Intraperitoneal ruptures should always be managed by formal surgical repair [190,193] because intraperitoneal urine extravasation can lead to peritonitis, intra-abdominal sepsis and death . Abdominal organs should be inspected for possible associated injuries and urinomas must be drained if detected. In the absence of other intra-abdominal injuries, laparoscopic suturing of the intraperitoneal rupture is possible .
The standard treatment is emergency exploration, debridement of devitalised bladder muscle and primary bladder repair [194,195]. A midline exploratory cystotomy is advised to inspect the bladder wall and the distal ureters . In gunshot wounds, there is a strong association with intestinal and rectal injuries, requiring faecal diversion [194,218]. Most gunshot wounds are associated with two transmural injuries (entry and exit wounds) and the bladder should be carefully checked for those two lesions . As the penetrating agent (bullet, knife) is not sterile, concomitant antibiotic treatment is advised .
Perforations recognised intra-operatively are primarily closed .
For bladder injuries not recognised during surgery or for internal injuries, a distinction must be made between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal injuries. For intraperitoneal injuries, the standard of care is surgical exploration with repair . If surgical exploration is performed after TURB, the bowel must be inspected to rule out concomitant injury . For extraperitoneal injuries, exploration is only needed for large perforations complicated by symptomatic extravesical collections. It requires drainage of the collection, with or without closure of the perforation .
If bladder perforation is encountered during mid-urethral sling or transvaginal mesh procedures, sling re-insertion and urethral catheterisation (one to two days) should be performed .
For perforated or eroded meshes, the intravesical portion must be removed endoscopically or by open surgery (retropubic or transvaginal). It is advised to excise the mesh at least 1 cm beyond the bladder urothelium. As this can be better accomplished with open surgery, the risk of persistent or recurrent mesh exposure is lower as compared to endoscopic removal . For other types of foreign bodies, cystoscopic removal is performed and if this fails cystotomy is needed .
Continuous bladder drainage is required to prevent elevated intravesical pressure and to allow the bladder to heal [197,234]. Conservatively treated bladder injuries (traumatic or external IBT) are followed by planned cystography scheduled to evaluate bladder healing, with catheter removal in case of absence of contrast extravasation . The first cystography is planned seven to ten days after injury. In case of ongoing leakage, cystoscopy must be performed to rule out bony fragments in the bladder and, if absent, cystography is done after one week .
After operative repair of a simple injury in a healthy patient, the catheter can be removed after seven to ten days without need for a control cystography [234,235]. After repair of a complex injury (trigone involvement, ureteric reimplantation) or in the case of risk factors of wound healing (e.g. use of steroids, malnutrition), control cystography is advised [234,235].
Summary of evidence
The risk of bladder perforation during mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence is lower for the obturator route compared to the retropubic route.
The combination of pelvic fracture and visible haematuria is highly suggestive of bladder injury.
Perform cystography in case of suspicion of a iatrogenic bladder injury in the post-operative setting.
Perform cystography (conventional or computed tomography imaging) in the presence of visible haematuria and pelvic fracture.
Cystography should be performed with filling of the bladder with at least 350 mL of dilute contrast.
Use cystoscopy to rule out bladder injury after suburethral sling procedure by the retropubic route.
Manage a blunt extraperitoneal bladder injury caused by blunt trauma conservatively, in the absence of bladder neck involvement and/or associated injuries that require surgical intervention.
Manage intraperitoneal injuries caused by blunt trauma by surgical exploration and repair.
Manage small uncomplicated iatrogenic intraperitoneal bladder injuries conservatively.
Perform control cystography to assess bladder wall healing after repair of a simple injury in a healthy patient.
Perform control cystography to assess bladder wall healing after repair of a complex injury or in case of risk factors for wound healing.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
The most common type of urethral trauma seen in urological practice is iatrogenic, due to catheterisation, instrumentation or surgery [236,237]. New treatment methods and applied energy sources can also injure the urethra .
Iatrogenic urethral trauma usually results from improper or prolonged catheterisation and accounts for 32% of strictures. Most of these strictures affect the bulbar urethra [238,239], while the bladder neck is rarely affected in such cases .
The size and type of catheter used have an important impact on urethral stricture formation. Current data indicate that silicone catheters and small-calibre Foley catheters are associated with less urethral morbidity  (see Figure 4.4.3). Implementing training programmes may significantly decrease the incidence of such injuries, increase patient safety and reduce the negative long-term effects [237,242].
Transurethral procedures are a common cause of iatrogenic urethral trauma. Factors that may influence the development of iatrogenic endoscopic urethral strictures include electrical dispersion generated by uni- or bipolar current and the diameter of the instruments used . The incidence of urethral strictures following mono- or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) appear to be equal, although some data indicates that bipolar TURP has a higher urethral stricture rate when used for higher prostate volumes (> 70 mL)  and that bladder neck strictures are also more common when bipolar TURP is used .
Predisposing factors most strongly associated with stricture formation in patients undergoing TURP are increased prostate volume, prostate cancer and the surgeon’s experience . Meatal strictures occur as a result of a mismatch between the size of the instrument and the diameter of the urethral meatus. Bulbar strictures occur due to insufficient insulation by the lubricant, causing the monopolar current to leak. To prevent strictures, lubricant gel should be applied carefully in the urethra.The lubricant must be re-applied when the resection time is prolonged . Internal urethrotomy must be performed before TURP if there are pre-existing meatal or urethral strictures .
There appears to be no relationship with the duration of the procedure or the method used (holmium laser or traditional TURP) on the rate of stricture formation .
Urethral stricture following prostate cancer treatment can occur anywhere from the bladder neck to the urethral meatus. The rate of bladder neck constriction after radical prostatectomy varies with the definition of the stricture used and individual practice [249,250]. Published data shows that the incidence of urethral stricture after various forms of prostate cancer therapy is 1.1-8.4%. The risk is greatest after radical prostatectomy if combined with external-beam radiation therapy. In a multivariate analysis, primary treatment type, age and obesity were found to be significant predictors for stricture development [249,251].
Robot-assisted prostatectomy also affects urinary function and the risk of iatrogenic trauma. Iatrogenic complications involving the bladder neck account for 2.2%, similar to the stricture rate found with conventional treatment for localised prostate cancer .
Anastomotic stricture is a complication in conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy. If prospective studies only are taken into account, there is no significant difference in the anastomotic stricture rates comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [251,253].
The development of urinary fistulae has been reported after brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy, with incidences of 0.3-3.0% and 0-0.6%, respectively, with most fistulae involving the rectum [254,255]. Brachytherapy is a recognised cause of strictures in patients with localised prostate cancer, as the CaPSURE study has shown . Previous TURP increases the risk of stricture formation [257,258].
Iatrogenic injuries to the urethra can be a complication of major pelvic procedures. Bladder and urethral catheterisation must therefore be carried out pre-operatively to prevent these complications . Radical cystectomy and subsequent urinary diversion may also cause urethral trauma . Table 4.4.1 lists the most common causes of urethral trauma.
Table 4.4.1: Most common causes of iatrogenic urethral trauma
32% of iatrogenic urethral strictures (52% bulbar urethra)
Urethral instrumentation for therapy and/or diagnosis
Treatment for prostatic disease
1.1-8.4% urethral stricture rate
Transurethral surgery (e.g. TURB/TURP)
2.2-9.8% urethral stricture rate
Radical prostatectomy (Radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation therapy)
0.5-32% bladder neck constriction; no difference between LRP and RALP (relative risk: 1.42; 95% confidence interval for relative risk, 0.40-5.06; p=0.59)
Radiotherapy (percutaneous or brachytherapy)
6% urethral stricture rate, 0.3-3.0% urinary fistula rate
Radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation therapy. This combination has the greatest risk for the formation of a urethral stricture
High-intensity focused ultrasound
Treatment for bladder disease
Transurethral resection of the bladder
3.1% subneovesical obstruction, 1.2% neovesicourethral anastomotic strictures, 0.9% urethral strictures
Injury during major abdominal and pelvic operations
TURB=transurethral resection of the bladder; TURP=transurethral resection of the prostate;
LRP=laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; RALP=robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy;
Different causes of anterior injuries  are listed in Table 4.4.2. Anterior urethral injuries are mainly caused by blunt trauma [261-263], with the bulbar urethra being the most common site injured [263,264]. In these bulbar injuries, which are mostly ‘straddle injuries’ or kicks in the perineum, the bulb is compressed against the pubic symphysis, resulting in rupture of the urethra at this site .
Penetrating injuries of the penile or bulbar urethra are rare and usually caused by gunshot wounds [265-270]. Depending on the affected segment, penetrating injuries are usually associated with penile, testicular and/or pelvic injuries [267,270].
Insertion of foreign bodies is another rare cause of anterior injury. It is usually a result of autoerotic stimulation or may be associated with psychiatric disorders . Penile fractures account for 10-20% of anterior injuries . In up to one-third of cases, the tear extends into the corpus spongiosum and urethra . Urethral instrumentation is by far the most common cause of urethral trauma in the Western world and can affect all segments of the anterior urethra [272,273].
Table 4.4.2: Aetiology of urethral injury
Fall astride (‘straddle’) e.g. on bicycle, fences, inspection covers
Kicks in the perineum
Urethral intraluminal stimulation
Injuries to the posterior urethra are most often related to pelvic fractures (~72%) [272,273], which themselves are usually caused by MVAs in up to 43% of cases [18,236,274,275]. Iatrogenic posterior injuries, due to irradiation or surgery to the prostate, are an increasing problem [272,273], but appear to be less common than previously believed (3-25%) .
Surgically, these injuries are divided into either partial or complete ruptures. In complete ruptures, there is a gap between the disrupted ends of the urethra. The dismembered ends of the urethra retract and fibrous tissue fills the space between them . There is no urethral wall in the scarred space and any lumen represents merely a fistulous tract between the urethral stumps . Injury to the posterior urethra exclusively occurs in pelvic fractures with disruption of the pelvic ring . The highest risk of urethral injury is in straddle fractures with a concomitant diastasis of the sacroiliac joint, followed by straddle fractures alone, and Malgaigne fractures . Displaced fractures of the inferomedial pubic bone and pubic symphysis diastasis, together with their degree of displacement, are independent predictors of urethral injury . Injuries of the bladder neck and prostate are rare  and they mostly occur at the anterior midline of both the bladder neck and prostatic urethra. It is more rare to find a complete transection of the bladder neck or an avulsion of the anterior part of the prostate .
Penetrating injuries of the pelvis, perineum or buttocks (mainly gunshot wounds) can also cause damage to the posterior urethra, but are extremely rare . There is a high probability of associated injuries (80-90%), mainly intra-abdominal [194,278].
Although urethral injuries themselves are not directly life-threatening [18,261], the association with pelvic fractures and concomitant injuries of the thorax, abdomen and spine, may be life-threatening [18,274].
Delayed morbidity of posterior urethral injuries includes strictures, incontinence and erectile dysfunction (ED), which may all have a detrimental effect on the patient’s quality of life . Erectile dysfunction occurs in up to 45% of patients after traumatic posterior urethral rupture [279,280]. Strong predictors for ED are diastasis of the pubic symphysis [279-282], lateral displacement of the prostate [279,283], a long urethral gap (> 2 cm) , a bilateral pubic rami fracture and a Malgaigne’s fracture . The assessment of sexual function and the definitive treatment (e.g. penile prosthesis) should be performed two years after the trauma because of the potential return of potency within that time .
Urethral injuries are very rare in females [262,265]. Pelvic fractures are the main aetiology . The injury is usually a partial longitudinal tear of the anterior wall associated with vaginal laceration [262,266]. Urethral injuries in females which extend into the bladder neck may disrupt the normal continence mechanism .
Blood at the meatus is the cardinal sign of urethral injury . The absence of it, however, does not rule out a urethral injury.
An inability to void (with a palpable distended bladder) is another classic sign and is often associated with a complete rupture . In addition, haematuria and pain on urination may be present. Interestingly, lower urinary tract pain is statistically more common in men < 40 years compared to men > 60 years . Urinary extravasation and bleeding may result in scrotal, penile and/or perineal swelling and ecchymosis, depending on the location and extent of the trauma [261,266]. The presentation of these clinical symptoms may be delayed (> 1 hour) .
Rectal examination should always be done to exclude an associated rectal injury (up to 5% of cases) [190,285] and may reveal a ‘high-riding’ prostate, which is an unreliable finding [190,236]. Failure to detect a rectal injury can cause significant morbidity and even mortality . A rectal injury is suggested by blood on the examining finger and/or a palpable laceration . Another sign of urethral injury is difficulty or an inability to pass a urethral catheter .
A female urethral injury should be suspected from the combination of a pelvic fracture with blood at the vaginal introitus, vaginal laceration, haematuria, urethrorrhagia, labial swelling and/or urinary retention [262,265,266]. Vaginal examination is indicated to assess vaginal lacerations .
Symptoms of urethral lesions caused by improper catheterisation or instrumentation are penile and/or perineal pain (100%) and urethral bleeding (86%) . Failure to accurately diagnose and treat urethral injuries may lead to significant long-term sequelae, mostly presenting as strictures [286,287].
Retrograde urethrography is the standard diagnostic investigation for the acute evaluation of a male urethral injury . A retrograde urethrography is conducted by injecting 20-30 mL of contrast material while occluding the meatus, with a balloon of a Foley catheter inflated in the fossa navicularis. Films should be taken in a 30°-oblique position, unless this is not possible because of the severity of the pelvic fractures and associated patient discomfort [261,266]. In an unstable patient, retrograde urethrography should be postponed until the patient has been stabilised [194,262].
A urethrogram allows for identification of the site of injury and assessment of the extent of any injury . Any extravasation outside the urethra is pathognomonic for urethral injury. However, the distinction between a complete and partial rupture is not always clear . A typical image for incomplete rupture shows extravasation from the urethra which occurs while the bladder is still filling. A complete rupture is suggested by massive extravasation without bladder filling .
The following classification of urethral injuries is based on retrograde urethrography (Table 4.4.3) :
Table 4.4.3: Staging of urethral injuries*
Stretched but intact
Complex (involves bladder neck/rectum)
*According to the 2004 Consensus Panel on Urethral Trauma .
Flexible cystoscopy is an option to diagnose (and manage) an acute urethral injury and may distinguish between complete- and incomplete rupture . In addition, it may allow a guidewire to be passed into the bladder for early catheterisation [262,288]. Flexible cystoscopy is also recommended above retrograde urethrography in suspected penile fracture-associated urethral injury [284,289,290]. In females, where the short urethra precludes adequate, radiological visualisation, urethroscopy and vaginoscopy are the diagnostic modalities of choice [261,262]. Flexible urethroscopy also plays an important role during post-operative follow-up, as its routine use is associated with a higher detection rate of urethral stricture recurrence, compared to the use of urinary flow rates .
Prior to deferred management, the combination of retrograde urethrography and antegrade cysto-urethrography is standard . The location and extent of the obliteration is diagnosed . An MRI of the pelvis provides valuable additional information, which can help to determine the most appropriate surgical strategy [261,283]. If the competence of the bladder neck is not clear upon antegrade cysto-urethrography, a suprapubic cystoscopy is advised .
Post-operative follow-up protocols include the use of retrograde urethrograms and voiding cysto-urethrograms at the time of catheter removal. Following this, urine flow charts as well as post-void residual urine, cystoscopy and urine culture, should be performed at variable intervals.
Anterior urethral injuries are usually not associated with other life-threatening injuries [262,266]. Treatment decisions are based mainly on the type of injury (blunt, penile fracture associated or penetrating).
Blunt anterior urethral injuries are associated with spongiosal contusion, which makes it more difficult to evaluate the limits of urethral debridement in the acute phase. Acute or early urethroplasty is therefore not indicated . The therapeutic options are suprapubic diversion or (a trial of) early endoscopic re-alignment with transurethral catheterisation . Urinary diversion is maintained for two and three weeks for partial and complete ruptures, respectively .
In order to preserve erectile function, penile fractures require early exploration [265,284,293,294]. The strategy consists of closing the tear in the cavernosal tunica albuginea, while the concomitant tear in the urethra is repaired at the same time . In these circumstances, there is no substantial urethral tissue loss . A small laceration can be repaired by simple closure, while a complete rupture requires an anastomotic repair [293,294].
Immediate exploration is advised, except when this is precluded by other life-threatening injuries . Devitalised tissues should be debrided, although urethral and spongiosal debridement should be kept to a minimum due to the excellent vascularisation [270,284]. For small lacerations and stab wounds, simple urethral closure might be sufficient . Defects of up to 2-3 cm in length in the bulbar urethra, and up to 1.5 cm in the penile urethra, can be treated by spatulation of the urethral ends and primary anastomosis [262,268,270]. In the case of longer defects or apparent infection (particularly bite wounds), a staged repair with urethral marsupialisation and a suprapubic catheter is needed [268,270]. Peri- and post-operative antibiotic treatment is also necessary .
- immediate: < 48 hours after injury (184.108.40.206.1.1);
- delayed primary: two days to two weeks after injury (220.127.116.11.1.2);
- deferred: > three months after injury (18.104.22.168.1.3).
- to monitor urinary output, since this is a valuable sign of the haemodynamic condition and the renal function of the patient;
- to treat symptomatic retention if the patient is still conscious;
- to minimise urinary extravasation and its secondary effects, such as infection and fibrosis.
Insertion of a suprapubic catheter is always a good solution in urgent situations [261,284]. However, insertion of a suprapubic catheter is not without risk, especially in the unstable trauma patient where the bladder is often displaced by the pelvic haematoma or because of poor bladder filling due to haemodynamic shock or concomitant bladder injury. In these circumstances, an attempt at urethral catheterisation can be carried out by experienced hands. It is extremely unlikely that the gentle passage of a urethral catheter will do any additional damage [236,262,266,272,273,295]. If there is any difficulty, a suprapubic catheter should be placed under US guidance and direct vision .
Partial tears of the posterior urethra can be managed with a suprapubic or urethral catheter . Urethrography should be performed at two-weekly intervals until healing has occurred [285,296]. Injuries may heal without significant scarring or obstruction if managed by diversion alone . A residual or subsequent stricture should be managed with:
- internal urethrotomy if it is short and non-obliterative;
- anastomotic urethroplasty, if it is long and dense, as is found with complete obliteration or after failed internal urethrotomy [292,297].
Acute definitive treatment options include:
- immediate re-alignment: apposition of the urethral ends over a catheter (22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199);
- immediate urethroplasty: suturing of urethral ends (188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206).
The aim of re-alignment is to correct severe distraction injuries rather than to prevent a stricture .
The reported benefits of re-alignment are:
- a lower stricture rate than with suprapubic catheter placement alone (where stricture formation is almost certain) [292,297,298];
- if scarring and subsequent stricture formation occurs, the restoration of urethral continuity is simplified;
- for short (< 2 cm), non-obliterative strictures, internal urethrotomy can be attempted, with a 50-90% success rate [292,297,299];
- for longer strictures, or in the case of failure of an internal urethrotomy, urethroplasty is required ;
- if urethroplasty is required later, it is technically easier when the prostate and urethra are well aligned .
Endoscopic re-alignment is the preferred technique [262,284]. Using a flexible/rigid cystoscope and biplanar fluoroscopy, a guidewire is placed inside the bladder. Over this, a catheter is placed into the bladder. If necessary, two cystoscopes can be used: one retrograde (per urethra) and one antegradely (suprapubic route through the bladder neck) [292,297,298]. The duration of catheter stay varies between four and eight weeks among series [190,292,297,298].
It is important to avoid traction on the Foley balloon catheter since it can damage the remaining sphincter mechanism at the bladder neck. Concomitant bladder neck or rectal injuries or presence of bony fragments inside the bladder must be repaired immediately.
The reasons for immediate repair of bladder neck and rectal injury are:
- unrepaired bladder neck injury risks incontinence and infection of pelvic fractures;
- unrepaired rectal injury carries the obvious risk of sepsis and fistula, early exploration is indicated to evacuate contaminated haematomas and to perform colostomy if necessary.
Immediate endoscopic re-alignment can also be performed when the patient is on the operating table for other surgery. Early endoscopic re-alignment (immediate or delayed primary, see below) is also possible in a stable patient without significant concomitant injuries [297,298].
Differences between series in the rates of incontinence, impotence and re-stricture can be explained by differences in patient selection (severe vs. less severe trauma), a mix of partial and complete ruptures, and differences in follow-up duration. Furthermore, these differences make the comparison with other techniques difficult, especially with urethroplasty [190,292,297,298].
Immediate urethroplasty with suturing of the urethral ends is difficult because of poor visualisation and the inability to assess accurately the degree of urethral disruption, due to extensive swelling and ecchymosis. This might lead to extensive unjustified urethral debridement . Another problem is the risk of uncontrolled bleeding following entry into the pelvic haematoma, which may result in uncontrolled re-bleeding . Due to disturbingly high rates of impotence (56%), incontinence (21%) and strictures (69%) , immediate urethroplasty cannot be recommended and should only be done in experienced centres [301,302].
Delayed treatment options include delayed primary re-alignment (220.127.116.11.1.2.1) and delayed primary urethroplasty (18.104.22.168.1.2.2).
In the absence of indications for immediate exploration, posterior urethral disruption can be managed in a delayed primary fashion. Delayed primary re-alignment requires the placement of a suprapubic tube at the time of initial injury, with endoscopic re-alignment performed within fourteen days (i.e. before fibrosis begins). At that time, patients are stable and most of the pelvic bleeding has resolved [296,298]. The aim and proposed benefits of delayed primary re-alignment are the same as mentioned for immediate re-alignment. Endoscopic re-alignment is also the preferred modality.
Delayed primary urethroplasty is performed no later than fourteen days after the initial injury i.e. before the start of the fibrotic process [303,304]. If successful, it avoids a long period of suprapubic diversion . It is restricted to stable patients with a short distraction defect, who are able to lie down in the lithotomy position . Considering the limited accumulated experience with this approach, it cannot be generally recommended [303,305,306].
Supporters of early vs. delayed intervention state that it does not affect the outcome of an eventual subsequent urethroplasty [301,307]. However, some authors have reported worse outcomes of subsequent urethroplasty after failed initial urethral manipulation (re-alignment or urethroplasty) [302,303,308]. Due to this concern and the excellent results obtained with deferred urethroplasty, early re-alignment or urethroplasty should only be selectively performed in highly experienced centres [301,302].
In the case of a complete rupture, treated with an initial period of three months’ suprapubic diversion, obliteration of the posterior urethra is almost inevitable [236,296]. Treatment options for these posterior urethral strictures are deferred urethroplasty (22.214.171.124.1.3.1) and deferred endoscopic optical incision (126.96.36.199.1.3.2).
Deferred urethroplasty is the procedure of choice for the treatment of posterior urethral distraction defects . After three months of suprapubic diversion, the pelvic haematoma is nearly always resolved, the prostate has descended into a more normal position, the scar tissue has stabilised  and the patient is clinically stable and able to lie down in the lithotomy position [261,262].
Most posterior urethral distraction defects are short and can be treated using a perineal anastomotic repair [261,303]. The key objective of the operation is to achieve a tension-free anastomosis between two healthy urethral ends (i.e. after complete excision of any scar tissue) [284,303].
After resection of fibrosis and spatulation of both healthy urethral ends, the gap between both ends is bridged by the so-called ‘elaborated perineal approach’, which is a series of consecutive manoeuvres, first described by Webster and Ramon  with reported success rates of 80-98% [310-314].
Most urethral stenoses are short and can be treated by mobilisation of the bulbar urethra, with or without separation of the corpora cavernosa . This is in contrast to the situation in developing countries, where stenoses are more complex and where additional manoeuvres, such as inferior pubectomy and supracrural re-routing or a combined abdominoperineal approach, are needed more often [299,311].
Distraction defects longer than 7-8 cm
A tubed interposition flap of penile or perineal skin can be used for reconstruction . This is seldom required and most patients that require flap urethroplasties have previous failed repairs of posterior urethral rupture .
These might require a combined abdominoperineal approach to secure adequate closure .
Synchronous anterior urethral stricture
The presence of anterior urethral stricture may compromise the blood supply to the bulbar urethra following division of the bulbar arteries. These patients should be treated cautiously.
The distal urethral sphincter mechanism can be defunctionalised by urethral distraction, so that urinary continence is maintained primarily by the proximal bladder neck sphincter. Concomitant bladder neck injury might increase incontinence and should require an abdominoperineal procedure to allow simultaneous bladder neck and urethral reconstruction [261,284,311].
Outcome after deferred urethroplasty is excellent with a stricture rate of around 10% [309,318]. Deferred urethroplasty is unlikely to result in additional ED [303,318]. Decompression of the erectile nerves after excision of the scar tissue might explain the amelioration of erectile function after urethroplasty . Incontinence is rare with deferred urethroplasty (< 4%)  and is usually due to incompetence of the bladder neck [284,311]. Standard therapy is a deferred urethroplasty at a minimum of three months after trauma, using a one-stage perineal approach, whenever possible.
Cold knife or laser core-through or cut-to-the light urethrotomy for complete urethral obliteration has been described. The results of this technique are poor [319,320] and the procedure is therefore not recommended. For short, non-obliterative strictures following re-alignment or urethroplasty, direct vision urethrotomy can be performed  while in other cases, urethroplasty is warranted.
The management of penetrating posterior urethral injuries is mainly dependent on associated injuries and the clinical condition of the patient [194,278]. If possible, immediate exploration by the retropubic route and primary repair or re-alignment can be performed [194,278,284]. In the case of rectal injury, a diverting colostomy is necessary [194,278]. Life-threatening associated injuries often preclude direct urethral repair. In those cases, suprapubic diversion with delayed abdominoperineal urethroplasty is advised [194,270,278].
Proximal and mid-urethral disruptions require immediate exploration and primary repair using the retropubic and transvaginal routes, respectively, with primary suturing of the urethral ends. Concomitant vaginal lacerations are repaired transvaginally at the same time [190,262,265,285]. Distal urethral injuries can be managed vaginally by primary suturing and closure of the vaginal laceration [262,285]. In all of these operations, it is advisable to use a flap (e.g. Martius) to prevent urethrovaginal fistulas . Nonetheless, distal urethral injuries can be left unrepaired and hypospadiac since they do not disrupt the sphincteric mechanism [190,262,265,285].
Temporary stenting with an indwelling catheter is the conventional treatment option for an acute false passage , although its value in minor urethral injuries is unproven. In difficult cases, catheter insertion may be assisted by cystoscopy and guidewire placement . Suprapubic catheterisation is an alternative.
Endoscopic management, either with incision or resection, can successfully treat iatrogenic prostatic urethral strictures. Indwelling catheter placement or an open procedure (which is associated with increased morbidity) are alternatives .
Urethral lesions following radiotherapy are often more difficult to treat and may require complex reconstructive surgery [254,255]. Section 188.8.131.52 lists the statements and recommendations regarding the iatrogenic causes of urethral trauma.
The following algorithms are suggested for the treatment of anterior and posterior urethral injuries in men (Figures 4.4.1 and 4.4.2).
Figure 4.4.1: Management of anterior urethral injuries in men
Figure 4.4.2: Management of posterior urethral injuries in men
Figure 4.4.3: Treatment of iatrogenic urethral injury caused by improper insertion of a catheter
Figure 4.4.4: Treatment for stricture after radical prostatectomy
Summary of evidence
Blunt trauma accounts for more than 90% of urethral injuries.
In penile fracture, the urethra is involved in 20% of cases.
The male posterior urethra is injured in 4-19% of pelvic fracture cases. In industrialised societies pelvic fracture-related injuries of the posterior urethra are the most common non-iatrogenic injuries.
Erectile dysfunction occurs in 20-60% of patients after traumatic urethral rupture.
Evaluate urethral injuries with flexible cystoscopy and/or retrograde urethrography.
Treat blunt anterior urethral injuries by suprapubic diversion.
Treat partial posterior urethral ruptures by urethral or suprapubic catheterisation.
Perform early endoscopic re-alignment when feasible.
Manage complete posterior urethral disruption with suprapubic diversion and delayed urethroplasty.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
Summary of evidence
Iatrogenic causes are the most common type of urethral injury in Europe, and therefore the most common cause of urethral stricture formation.
Implementing training programmes on urinary catheter insertion significantly improves the rate of catheter-related complications.
New technologies represent an additional source of urethral injury.
Provide appropriate training to reduce the risk of traumatic catheterisation.
Preform urethral instrumentation when there are valid clinical indications.
Keep duration of catheterisation to a minimum.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
Genito-urinary trauma is seen in both sexes across all age groups. Of all urological injuries, 33-66% involve the external genitalia . Genital trauma is much more common in males than in females, especially between the ages of 15 and 40 years. This is due to anatomical differences, increased frequency of road traffic accidents and increased participation in physical sports, war and violent crime.
Genital trauma is commonly caused by blunt injuries (80%). The risk of associated injuries to neighbouring organs (bladder, urethra, vagina, rectum and bowel) after blunt trauma is higher in females than in males. In males, blunt genital trauma frequently occurs unilaterally with only approximately 1% presenting as bilateral scrotal or testicular injuries .
Any kind of contact sport, without the use of necessary protective aids, may be associated with genital trauma. Off-road bicycling, motorbike riding (especially on motorbikes with a dominant petrol tank), rugby, football and hockey are all activities which are associated with blunt testicular trauma [326-329].
Penetrating injuries account for 20% of genito-urinary trauma, with 40-60% of all penetrating genito-urinary lesions involving the external genitalia [267,330]. Thirty-five per cent of all genito-urinary gunshot wounds involve the genitalia . In a recent series of wartime genito-urinary injuries, 71.5% of 361 operations involved the external genitalia - the majority caused by IEDs and other explosive ordinance, while smaller numbers of injuries were due to gunshot injuries . In both males and females, penetrating genital injuries occur with other associated injuries in 70% of patients. In males, penetrating scrotal injuries affect both testes in 30% of cases compared with 1% in blunt scrotal injuries [325,332]. Self-mutilation of the external genitalia has also been reported in psychotic patients and trans-sexuals . Genital burns are rare in isolation, usually due to industrial flame or chemicals in adults, and all but the full thickness type are treated conservatively . Both male and female genital piercings increase the risk for unexpected genital trauma . Although there is an increased risk of Hepatitis B and C in genitally injured patients, there is no higher incidence of sexual transmitted diseases (STDs) in patients with genital piercings .
In genital trauma, a urinalysis should be performed. The presence of visible- and/or non-visible haematuria requires a retrograde urethrogram in males. In females, flexible or rigid cystoscopy has been recommended to exclude urethral and bladder injury [336,337]. In women with genital injuries and blood at the vaginal introitus, further gynaecological investigation is needed to exclude vaginal injuries . The potential for significant injury should never be discounted in those patients who may also have blood in the vaginal vault from menstruation. Complete vaginal inspection with specula is mandatory.
In patients with genitalia injured by gunshot wounds, it is very useful to have information about the causative weapon, particularly the range, calibre and type of weapon. High-velocity missiles transmit large amounts of energy to the tissues and can produce trauma to structures outside the wound track. The passage of a missile creates an expansive cavity of sub-atmospheric pressure, which then collapses and creates shear forces and induction of other foreign bodies and (usually) infected material .
Although animal bites are common, bites injuring the external genital are rare. Wounds are usually minor, but have a risk of wound infection. The most common bacterial infection caused by a dog bite is Pasturella multicida, which accounts for up to 50% of infections . Other commonly involved organisms are Escherichia coli, Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, Eikenella corrodens, Capnocytophaga canimorsus, Veillonella parvula, Bacteroides and Fusobacterium spp. [333,338,339]. Antibiotics should be prescribed in accordance with local resistance patterns [340-342].
The possibility of rabies infection must be considered. If rabies infection is suspected, vaccination should be considered taking into account the geographical location, animal involved, specific nature of the wound and the type of attack (provoked/unprovoked). Besides vaccination, local wound management is an essential part of post-exposure prophylaxis. High-risk patients should be vaccinated with human rabies immunoglobulin and human diploid cell vaccine [343,344].
Human bites are much less common, but infection should be considered, especially in at risk groups. Since transmission of viral diseases may occur, risk assessment should be made. If appropriate, hepatitis B vaccine/immunoglobulin and/or immunodeficiency virus (HIV) post-exposure prophylaxis should be offered. For further details, see Guidelines for the Management of Human Bite Injuries .
Accidents during sexual intercourse can cause genital trauma, men of younger age are the most affected. The major pathologies are: penile fractures, strangulation and necrosis, and urethrovesical foreign bodies resulting from autoeroticism practices .
Genital injury is often seen (42%) after sexual abuse, which must be considered when genital injuries present at any age . In these cases, the examiner should be aware of the extraordinary emotional situation of the patient and the privacy of the patient should be respected. In suspicious cases, gynaecological and forensic support and advice is necessary. Swabs or vaginal smears should be taken for detection of spermatozoa  and local legal protocols followed closely. A thorough history and examination (in some cases under anaesthesia), photo documentation, and identification of forensic material may be important. In a recent report, only 38% of the forensic samples tested positive for an ejaculate and/or sperm. This may be due to delayed presentation or lack of vaginal/anal ejaculation [349,350].
Blunt trauma to the flaccid penis does not usually cause tearing of the tunica. In these cases, only subcutaneous haematoma with intact tunica albuginea may be seen.
The most important and common presentation of blunt penile trauma is penile fracture. A recent meta-analysis on penile fractures showed that the most common causes are sexual intercourse, forced flexion (taqaandan), masturbation and rolling over in 46%, 21%, 18 % and 8.2% respectively . The most common mechanism of injury is when the penis slips out of the vagina and strikes against the symphysis pubis or perineum. Sixty per cent of cases occur during consensual intercourse , with penile fracture more likely when the partner is on top. Penile fracture is caused by rupture of the cavernosal tunica albuginea, and may be associated with subcutaneous haematoma and lesions of the corpus spongiosum or urethra in 10-22% [353,354].
The thickness of the tunica albuginea in the flaccid state (approximately 2 mm) decreases in erection to 0.25-0.5 mm, and is therefore more vulnerable to traumatic injury [355,356]. Penile fracture is associated with a sudden cracking or popping sound, pain and immediate detumescence. Local swelling of the penile shaft develops quickly, due to enlarging haematoma. Bleeding may spread along the fascial layers of the penile shaft and extend to the lower abdominal wall if Buck’s fascia is also ruptured. Sometimes, the rupture of the tunica may be palpable. Less severe penile injuries can be distinguished from penile fracture, as they are not usually associated with detumescence .
A thorough history and examination usually confirm the diagnosis, but in some cases imaging may be useful. Cavernosography, US or MRI [351,357-359] can identify lacerations of the tunica albuginea in unclear cases , or provide reassurance that the tunica is intact. If a concomitant urethral injury is suspected, a retrograde urethrogram may be performed, however, flexible cystoscopy under anaesthesia during exploration/repair is more usually employed.
Subcutaneous haematoma, without associated rupture of the cavernosal tunica albuginea, does not require surgical intervention. In these cases, non-steroidal analgesics and ice-packs are recommended .
When a penile fracture is diagnosed, surgical intervention with closure of the tunica albuginea is recommended, it ensures the lowest rate of negative long-term sequelae and has no negative effect on the psychological well-being of the patient . The approach is usually through a circumferential incision proximal to the coronal sulcus which enables complete degloving of the penis. Increasingly, local longitudinal incisions centred on the area of fracture or ventral longitudinal approaches are currently used . Further localisation may be gained with a flexible cystoscopy performed prior to incision, if urethral trauma is suspected and eventually proven.
Surgical closure of the tunica should be carried out using absorbable sutures. Post-operative complications were reported in up to 20% of cases, development of plaques or nodules following surgery, post-operative curvature formation and ED occur in 13.9%, 2.8% and 1.9% of patients, respectively . Conservative management of penile fracture is not recommended, as it significantly increases the rate of post-operative complications . It increases complications, such as penile abscess, missed urethral disruption, penile curvature, and persistent haematoma requiring delayed surgical intervention . Late complications after conservative management were fibrosis and angulations in 35% and impotence in up to 62% [352,363].
Penetrating penile trauma is rarely seen in isolation. Most cases are associated with multiple injuries. Non-operative management is recommended in small superficial injuries with intact Buck’s fascia . In more significant penetrating penile injuries, surgical exploration and debridement of necrotic tissue is recommended. Even in extended injuries of the penis, primary alignment of the disrupted tissues may allow for acceptable healing because of the robust penile blood supply .
The principles of care are debridement of devitalised tissue, with the preservation of as much viable tissues as possible, haemostasis, diversion of urine in selected cases and the removal of foreign bodies. Tissues of questionable viability may be left for subsequent definitive surgery. If a subsequent immediate or delayed repair is needed, depending on the type of injury and the extent of tissue damage, it usually takes place four to six weeks after the trauma has occurred.
The surgical approach depends upon the site and extent of the injury, but a subcoronal incision with penile degloving usually gives good exposure. Initially, a defect in the tunica albuginea should be closed after copious irrigation. If there has been too much tissue loss, the defect can be repaired either immediately or after delay with a patch (either from an autologous saphenous vein or xenograft). If a concomitant urethral injury is suspected, a pre- or peri-operative urethrogram or cystoscopy is useful to diagnose any urethral involvement, to define its position, and to decide upon the incision used.
The elasticity of genital skin means it is usually possible to manage the loss of a moderate amount of penile skin. However, management is more difficult in extensive injuries with significant skin loss. The tissue chosen for reconstruction following trauma needs to provide good coverage and must be suitable for reconstruction. Split-thickness skin grafting provides good coverage and a dependable take that is reproducible and durable. However, split-thickness grafts contract more than full-thickness grafts and their use on the penile shaft should be kept to a minimum. In accordance, McAninch et al. recommended the use of skin grafts with thickness of at least 0.015 inch (0.4 mm) in order to reduce the risk of contraction . Full-thickness skin grafting onto the penile shaft gives less contracture, a better cosmetic appearance and more resistance to trauma during intercourse, when eventually re-established . The donor site may be taken from the abdomen, buttock, thigh or axilla and is chosen according to surgeon’s preference and the pattern of injury.
In cases of extensive destruction of deeper tissues, or if later prosthetic placement is being considered, skin flaps, with their secure vascular supply, can be used.
Most injuries are self-inflicted, but some are a result of industrial accidents or assault. Acute management involves resuscitation of the patient, who may be compromised from massive blood loss, and preparation for surgical re-implantation of the penis if it has been recovered and is not too badly damaged. Surgical re-implantation should be considered for all patients and should be performed within 24 hours of amputation. If the injury occurred during a psychotic episode, early psychiatric advice and support should be sought .
The severed penis should be washed with sterile saline, wrapped in saline-soaked gauze, placed in a sterile bag and immersed in iced water. The penis must not come into direct contact with the ice. A pressure dressing or a tourniquet should be placed around the penile stump to prevent excessive blood loss. Re-attachment can be achieved in a non-microsurgical way, a technique which probably gives higher rates of post-operative urethral stricture and more problems with loss of sensation . When operating microscopically, the corpora cavernosa and urethra are firstly aligned and repaired. Subsequently, the dorsal penile arteries, the dorsal vein and the dorsal nerves are anastomosed. The cavernosal arteries are generally too small to anastomose. The fascia and skin are closed in layers and both a urethral and a supra-pubic catheter are placed.
If the severed penis cannot be found, or is unsuitable for re-attachment, then the end should be closed as it is done in partial penectomy. Later reconstruction may be employed to lengthen the penis (e.g. suspensory ligament division and V-Y plasty, pseudo-glans formation with split-thickness skin grafting, etc). A delayed major reconstructive procedure, i.e. phalloplasty (either radial artery or pubic), is sometimes required for injuries which leave a very small or non-functioning penile stump .
Blunt trauma to the scrotum can cause testicular dislocation, testicular haematocoele, testicular rupture and/or scrotal haematoma.
Traumatic dislocation of the testicle rarely occurs and is most common in victims of MVAs [366-369]. Bilateral dislocation of the testes has been reported in up to 25% of cases . It can be either a subcutaneous dislocation with epifascial displacement of the testis or an internal dislocation. In the latter, the testis is positioned in the superficial external inguinal ring, inguinal canal or abdominal cavity. Traumatic dislocation of the testis is treated by manual replacement and secondary orchidopexy. If primary manual reposition cannot be performed, immediate orchidopexy is indicated.
Conservative management is recommended in haematoceles smaller than three times the size of the contralateral testis . In large haematoceles, non-operative management can fail, and delayed surgery (more than three days) is often required. Patients with large haematoceles have a higher rate of orchiectomy than patients who undergo early surgery, even in non-ruptured testes [325,333,371-373]. Early surgical intervention results in preservation of the testis in more than 90% of cases compared to delayed surgeries which result in orchiectomy in 45-55% of patients . In addition, non-operative management is also associated with prolonged hospital stays. Therefore, large haematoceles should be treated surgically, irrespective of the presence of testicular contusion or rupture. At the very least, the blood clot should be evacuated from the tunica vaginalis sac to relieve disability and hasten recovery. Patients initially treated non-operatively may eventually need delayed surgery if they develop infection or undue pain.
Testicular rupture is found in approximately 50% of cases of direct blunt scrotal trauma . It may occur under intense, traumatic compression of the testis against the inferior pubic ramus or symphysis, resulting in a rupture of the tunica albuginea of the testis. A force of approximately 50 kg is necessary to cause testicular rupture . Testicular rupture is associated with immediate pain, nausea, vomiting, and sometimes fainting. The hemiscrotum is tender, swollen, and ecchymotic. The testis itself may be difficult to palpate.
Ultrasound should be performed to determine intra- and/or extra-testicular haematoma, testicular contusion, or rupture [375-383]. However, the literature is contradictory as to the usefulness of US compared to clinical examination alone. Some studies have reported convincing findings with a specificity of up to 98.6% . Others reported poor specificity (78%) and sensitivity (28%) for the differentiation between testicular rupture and haematocele, while accuracy is as low as 56% . Colour Doppler-duplex US may provide useful information when used to evaluate testicular perfusion. If scrotal US is inconclusive, testicular CT or MRI may be helpful . However, these techniques did not specifically increase the detection rates of testicular rupture. It is therefore essential to surgically explore equivocal patients whenever imaging studies cannot definitively exclude testicular rupture. This involves exploration with evacuation of blood clots and haematoma, excision of any necrotic testicular tubules and closure of the tunica albuginea, usually with running absorbable sutures (e.g. 3/0 Vicryl).
Penetrating injuries to the scrotum require surgical exploration with conservative debridement of non-viable tissue. Depending on the extent of the injury, primary reconstruction of the testis and scrotum can usually be performed. In complete disruption of the spermatic cord, re-alignment without vaso-vasostomy may be considered if surgically feasible . Staged secondary microsurgical vaso-vasostomy can be performed after rehabilitation, although only a few cases have been reported . If there is extensive destruction of the tunica albuginea, mobilisation of a free tunica vaginalis flap can be performed for testicular closure. If the patient is unstable or reconstruction cannot be achieved, orchiectomy is then indicated.
Prophylactic antibiotics are recommended after scrotal penetrating trauma, although data to support this approach is lacking. Tetanus prophylaxis is mandatory. Post-operative complications were reported in 8% of patients who underwent testicular repair after penetrating trauma .
Extended laceration of scrotal skin requires surgical intervention for skin closure. Due to the elasticity of the scrotum, most defects can be primarily closed, even if the lacerated skin is only minimally attached to the scrotum . Local wound management with extensive initial wound debridement and washout is important for scrotal convalescence. In the case of extensive loss of genital tissue, e.g. IED blast injury, complex and staged reconstructive surgical procedures are often required .
In females with blunt trauma to the external genitalia, imaging of the pelvis with US, CT, or MRI should be performed since additional injuries and extensive intra-pelvic haematomas are frequently expected [337,348].
Consensual sexual intercourse can lead to genital trauma in women. Up to 35% of all genital injuries in women are sustained during their first sexual contact. The majority of women present with bleeding and pain. The most frequently found injuries are lacerations. These lesions can be treated with a simple suture under local anesthesia .
Blunt trauma to the vulva is rarely reported and usually presents as a large haematoma. The incidence of traumatic vulvar haematomas after vaginal deliveries has been reported as 1 in 310 deliveries . Although blunt trauma to the female external genitalia is rarely reported, the presence of a vulvar haematoma is closely related to an increased risk of associated vaginal, pelvic or abdominal injuries. Goldman et al. reported that blunt injuries of the vulva and vagina were associated with pelvic trauma in 30%, after consensual intercourse in 25%, following sexual assault in 20%, and other blunt trauma in 15% .
Blunt vulvar or perineal trauma may be associated with voiding problems and bladder catheterisation is usually required. Vulvar haematomas usually do not require surgical intervention, although they can cause a significant blood loss, which sometimes even requires blood transfusion. Data are scarce , but in haemodynamically stable women, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication and cold packs are generally successful. Yet, in cases of massive vulvar haematoma and haemodynamically unstable patients, surgical intervention with lavage and drainage is sometimes indicated .
Although antibiotics are often recommended after major vulvar trauma, there is no data to support this approach. It is important to emphasise that vulvar haematoma and/or blood at the vaginal introitus are indications for vaginal exploration under sedation or general anaesthesia. The aim is to identify possible associated vaginal and/or rectal injuries . Flexible or rigid cystoscopy has been recommended to exclude urethral and bladder injury [336,337]. In the case of vulvar laceration, suturing after conservative debridement is indicated. If there are associated injuries to the vagina, these can be repaired immediately by primary suturing.
Summary of evidence
Most genital injuries, in males and females, are caused by blunt trauma.
Treat penile fractures surgically, with closure of tunica albuginea.
Explore the injured testis in all cases of testicular rupture and in those with inconclusive ultrasound findings.
Urological trauma is often associated with significant and higher priority injuries in the polytraumatised patient . Lessons from civilian trauma networks, the battlefield, and mass casualty events have led to many advances in general trauma care [391,392]. These include the widespread acceptance of damage control principles, trauma centralisation and recognition of the value of dedicated trauma teams. Urologists need to understand their role in the context of polytrauma with the ultimate aims of improving survivability and decreasing morbidity in these patients.
Multidisciplinary management of trauma patients has been shown to improve outcomes . Major trauma patients initially managed in local hospitals are 1.5-5 times more likely to die than patients transported directly to specialist trauma centres. The re-organisation of care to these centres has been shown to reduce mortality by 25% and length of stay by four days . Major trauma centres, which are expected to provide senior-led resuscitative trauma teams, dedicated trauma theatres, input from all major surgical specialties and interventional radiologists, have therefore been established worldwide. Urologists have an important role to play in this process .
Manage polytrauma patients in designated major trauma centres within a trauma network.
Involve urologists in cases of associated urological injury.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
Damage control is a life-saving strategy for severely injured patients that recognises the consequences of the lethal triad of trauma, i.e. hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis [395-397].
It is a prioritised three-phase approach:
- the first phase consists of rapid control of haemorrhage and wound contamination;
- the second phase involves resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU), with the goal of restoring normal temperature, coagulation, and tissue oxygenation;
- the third stage involves definitive surgery when more time-consuming reconstructive procedures are performed in the stabilised patient .
Identifying which patients benefit from the damage control mode requires critical decision-making by the trauma team leader. Prior preparedness and regular communication between the surgical, critical care and anaesthetic teams are vital . Damage control principles have been successfully adopted in the context of civilian mass casualty events, military field surgery, and initial treatment in rural areas with long-range transfers [396,400].
Urologists are often asked for advice in polytrauma patients, some of whom might be in a damage control phase of management. Fortunately, the management of urological trauma often involves the use of temporary measures, followed by later definitive surgery, which fits in well with these principles. In the polytrauma setting, the urologist will usually work alongside the general/trauma surgeon. Procedures should be directed at the rapid control of bleeding, debridement of dead and devitalised tissue, and minimising urinary extravasation by simple diversionary measures. Complex reconstructive procedures, including organ preservation, are preferably delayed.
Examples where urological input is required in the polytraumatised patient include:
- haemodynamically unstable patients with suspected intra-abdominal bleeding, who are transferred urgently to the operating theatre without any pre-operative imaging;
- stable patients with suspected renal injuries-penetrating trauma to the upper abdomen/flanks/lower chest, or blunt abdominal trauma and visible haematuria;
- patients with suspected urethral or bladder injury associated with pelvic fractures; blood at the urethral meatus and/or the inability to void;
- external genitalia injury associated with penetrating trauma (intra-abdominal injury).
Summary of evidence
Damage control principles govern the management of severely injured polytrauma patients.
Follow damage control principles in the management of severely injured polytrauma patients.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
The incidence of multi-organ injury is high in penetrating trauma . Most of these injuries can be managed without surgical exploration . Renal exploration is required to control life-threatening bleeding . The preservation of viable renal parenchyma is a secondary goal, with time-consuming renal reconstruction delayed until the patient is optimised .
At laparotomy, it is considered best practice not to explore the injured kidney if there is no active haemorrhage, even if delayed exploration is then necessary . In unstable patients, packing the renal fossa and transferring the patient to the surgical intensive care unit is the option of choice for damage control. A planned second-look laparotomy is then performed . However, in patients with significant ongoing haemorrhage, speedy nephrectomy is required. It is recommended that the contralateral kidney should at least be palpated prior to nephrectomy .
In patients who are packed temporarily and who become sufficiently stable in the intensive setting, radiological assessment allows definitive management to begin. Computed tomography allows the kidney injury to be graded, documents the presence of a contralateral kidney, and helps to determine whether or not intervention (radiological or surgical) is necessary.
In patients who are haemodynamically unstable after the initial acute-damage-control laparotomy, or in patients with deteriorating haemodynamic parameters (indicating ongoing or delayed bleeding), the management options are angiographic embolisation of the bleeding kidney or re-operation. This decision should be made according to:
- the status of the patient;
- the presence of associated injuries (stapled bowel, packed liver or spleen), which may need re-operation irrespective of the renal injury;
- the availability of angioembolisation.
Haemostatic techniques, many of which were developed for hepatic surgery and splenic trauma, can be used to control renal parenchymal bleeding. These techniques are not consistent with damage control principles and should only be considered in the rare casualty situation of a solitary kidney or bilateral renal injury. These techniques are outlined below:
- mattress sutures through the parenchyma, i.e. renorrhaphy ;
- haemostatic agents, i.e. combined acellular matrix and fibrin sealants ;
- absorbable mesh kidney bags to maintain contact between renal parenchymal fragments ;
- intra-operative drain left in situ to collect any urine that leaks following organ salvage.
Manage life-threatening bleeding from renal injury by urgent nephrectomy.
Manage profuse non-arterial bleeding by renal packing as a damage control measure.
Use angioembolisation as an effective haemostatic measure.
*Upgraded based on panel consensus
Ureteral injuries are primarily associated with penetrating intra-abdominal injury; although rapid deceleration injuries can also result in ureteropelvic disruption . A high index of suspicion is required as these injuries are quite commonly missed . The results of immediate ureteral reconstruction are generally satisfactory, but this is time-consuming and may not be appropriate in the polytraumatised patient. Diagnostic procedures, such as on-table IVP or retrograde ureteropyelography to evaluate ureteral injuries are also not recommended in this setting.
If a ureteral injury is suspected but not clearly identified, a drain should be sited. If urine leaks post-operatively, a nephrostomy should be arranged. If a partial ureteral tear is identified (less than half a circumference) and the ureter is otherwise healthy, a double J-stent may be inserted over a guide wire through the tear, and the tear quickly closed with fine interrupted absorbable stitches.
When complete ureteral injuries are identified, definitive repair should not be performed. Dissection of the ureteral stumps should be avoided as it interferes with the blood supply. Temporary measures to control urine spillage should be performed:
- a single J or 8 French feeding tube is inserted into the ureter;
- the end of the disrupted proximal ureter is secured over the tube, which is exteriorised and secured to the skin.
The distal ureteral stump does not need to be ligated and any unnecessary manipulation should be avoided. Intra-operative placement of a nephrostomy tube is time-consuming and should be avoided [112,180]. Tying off the injured ureteral segment and inserting a percutaneous nephrostomy post-operatively is a viable alternative . Rarely, in cases with severe associated injuries of the ipsilateral kidney, nephrectomy is required.
Rule out ureteral injury in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Treat ureteral injury with ‘tube’ urinary diversion if repair is not performed.
*Upgraded following panel consensus.
In the acute polytrauma setting, a bladder injury should be treated with bladder drainage by a suprapubic and/or a urethral catheter. Later, definitive treatment can follow as necessary . Ideally, large intraperitoneal bladder ruptures (often associated with unstable pelvic fractures) should be closed primarily and drained, as this will cope with both haemorrhage control and urinary contamination.
Examples of temporary measures that may be necessary include:
- the placement of externalised ureteral stents to provide external urinary drainage in extensive bladder rupture ;
- packing and/or arteriography and selective embolisation in unstable patients with severe bladder haemorrhage ;
- the placement of a pelvic suction drain for urinary evacuation .
Provide urinary drainage by either the suprapubic or urethral route.
Urethral injury of any kind is not life-threatening, but the associated injuries are often severe. In this situation, wherever the location or extent of injury, drainage through a suprapubic or urethral catheter should be obtained without prior imaging .
Traditionally, traumatic injuries of the external genitalia have a low priority and management is often deferred . In the polytraumatised patient, the management of these injuries should be guided by the principles of haemorrhage control, debridement and urinary diversion (via a catheter). Delayed organ conservation is possible, particularly in testicular injury .
Temporary damage control measures that might be applicable include:
- compression dressing of the penis ;
- packing of penetrating testicular injuries;
- tampons for vulvar lacerations.
A mass casualty event is one in which the number of injured people is significantly higher than the number of available healthcare providers . A mass casualty disaster does not therefore necessarily involve a large number of victims, but it is related to the disproportion between the number of victims and the size of the medical team available [409,410].
There are little published data on the best way in which to handle these events. However, recent developments in both the military and civilian settings have led to greater survivability following major trauma . Triage, communication and preparedness are important components for a successful response.
Potential mass casualty events include:
- transportation systems accidents, e.g. road traffic, aircraft, shipping, railways;
- natural disasters, e.g. earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, tsunamis;
- industry, e.g. chemical spills, factory explosions and fires;
- civilian terrorism.
Triage after mass casualty events is difficult and involves difficult moral and ethical considerations. Disaster triage requires differentiation of the few critically injured individuals who can be saved by immediate intervention from the many others with non-life-threatening injuries for whom treatment can be delayed. The ethical dilemmas that arise are primarily caused by having to decide who should be actively treated, or subsequently whether to stop treatment, because of injuries deemed un-survivable or incompatible with survival in the home environment.
2.Patients with severe but non-life-threatening injuries, in whom treatment can be acceptably delayed, including those with major fractures, vascular injuries of the limbs and large soft tissue wounds.
4.Patients who are so severely injured that treatment would require allocation of resources and time that would deny timely care to other patients with greater survivability. These patients are given minimal or no treatment, and are re-evaluated when resources become available. There is no absolute definition for this group because triage is individualised, according to the number and severity of casualties related to the available resources. The decision to implement this category is decided when sufficient information of the incident is available and is made at the highest level possible.
Triage should be performed at each stage from the pre-hospital setting to the emergency department and repeated as the clinical situation evolves. Ultimately, the individual in charge is responsible for directing specialty surgical teams, including urologists, and assigning them responsibility for specific patients as dictated by the specific injuries.
Urological consultations during a mass casualty scenario should follow the principles outlined below:
2.Avoid unnecessary imaging procedures such as CT scans and retrograde urethrography. These procedures should be performed later, after re-evaluation of the patient, and after mass casualty protocols have been suspended.
4.Stable patients should be transferred to the surgical ward without imaging procedures. Re-evaluate if there is any change in their haemodynamic status, or when possible as dictated by the constraints of the mass casualty event.
5.‘Minimal acceptable’ treatment for all urological injuries should be performed in order to transfer patients to the surgical wards and are outlined above in the Section 5.4 Urological injury management in polytrauma.
1.Tekgül, S., et al. EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology 2017. In: EAU Guidelines Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress London 2017, European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
7.Elshout P-J., V.E., Serafetinidis E. What are the comparative outcomes of early endoscopic realignment versus suprapubic diversion alone for pelvic fracture related urethral injuries?. PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2015.
11.Thornley, S., et al. Alcohol intake, marijuana use, and sleep deprivation on the risk of falls occurring at home among young and middle-aged adults: a case-crossover study. N Z Med J, 2014. 127: 32.
87.van der Wilden, G.M., et al. Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt renal injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of New England Centers for Trauma. JAMA Surg, 2013. 148: 924.
88.Charbit, J., et al. What are the specific computed tomography scan criteria that can predict or exclude the need for renal angioembolization after high-grade renal trauma in a conservative management strategy? J Trauma, 2011. 70: 1219.
96.Husmann, D.A., et al. Major renal lacerations with a devitalized fragment following blunt abdominal trauma: a comparison between nonoperative (expectant) versus surgical management. J Urol, 1993. 150: 1774.
173.Pokala, N., et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007. 22: 683.
178.Lucarelli, G., et al. Delayed relief of ureteral obstruction is implicated in the long-term development of renal damage and arterial hypertension in patients with unilateral ureteral injury. J Urol, 2013. 189: 960.
185.Wenske, S., et al. Outcomes of distal ureteral reconstruction through reimplantation with psoas hitch, Boari flap, or ureteroneocystostomy for benign or malignant ureteral obstruction or injury. Urology, 2013. 82: 231.
206.Novara, G., et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol, 2010. 58: 218.
211.Golan, S., et al. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour complicated by perforation requiring open surgical repair - clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes. BJU Int, 2011. 107: 1065.
213.Sugihara, T., et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes including severe bladder injury between monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a population based comparison.
J Urol, 2014. 192: 1355.
226.Stember, D.S., et al. Outcomes of abdominal wall reservoir placement in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a safe and efficacious alternative to the space of Retzius. J Sex Med, 2014. 11: 605.
229.Navsaria, P.H., et al. Selective nonoperative management in 1106 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: conclusions on safety, efficacy, and the role of selective CT imaging in a prospective single-center study. Ann Surg, 2015. 261: 760.
240.Hammarsten, J., et al. Suprapubic catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate: a way to decrease the number of urethral strictures and improve the outcome of operations. J Urol, 1992. 147: 648.
250.Park, R., et al. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence. Urology, 2001. 57: 742.
252.Msezane, L.P., et al. Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 97.
292.Mouraviev, V.B., et al. The treatment of posterior urethral disruption associated with pelvic fractures: comparative experience of early realignment versus delayed urethroplasty. J Urol, 2005. 173: 873.
299.Kulkarni, S.B., et al. Posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects in developing and developed countries, and choice of surgical technique. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1049.
303.Lumen, N., et al. Perineal anastomotic urethroplasty for posttraumatic urethral stricture with or without previous urethral manipulations: a review of 61 cases with long-term followup. J Urol, 2009. 181: 1196.
316.MacDiarmid, S., et al. The importance of accurate assessment and conservative management of the open bladder neck in patients with post-pelvic fracture membranous urethral distraction defects.
Br J Urol, 1995. 75: 65.
322.Gokalp, A., et al. How to manage acute urethral false passage due to intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injured patients who refused insertion of an indwelling catheter. J Urol, 2003. 169: 203.
386.Tchounzou, R., et al. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Features, Treatment and Outcome of Coital Injuries of the Female Genital Tract Consecutive to Consensual Sexual Intercourse in the Limbe Regional Hospital. Sex Med, 2015. 3: 256.
403.Best, C.D., et al. Traumatic ureteral injuries: a single institution experience validating the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale grading scale. J Urol, 2005. 173: 1202.
All members of the Urological Trauma Guidelines working group have provided disclosure statements of all relationships that they have that might be perceived as a potential source of a conflict of interest. This information is publically accessible through the European Association of Urology website: http://uroweb.org/guidelines/. This guidelines document was developed with the financial support of the European Association of Urology. No external sources of funding and support have been involved. The EAU is a non-profit organisation and funding is limited to administrative assistance and travel and meeting expenses. No honoraria or other reimbursements have been provided.