European Association of Urology
Guidelines
Education & Events
Join our events Join our events
On-demand education Learn at your own pace
Scholarships Enrich your capabilities
Exchange Programmes Urology beyond Europe
Education Educational Platforms Talent Incubator Programme Accreditation
Science & Publications
Publications Our publications
Research & Science Passionate about research?
About
Who we are Our mission and history
Our Board and Offices How we work
Join the EAU Find out about membership
Vacancies Contact

EAU15: Measuring and improving prostate cancer care

Sun, 22 Mar 2015

Medical coverage in the United States presents unique challenges related to costs. They can be tackled through enabling partnerships between the medical community and insurance companies, but most importantly, by thinking out of the box.

One example of collaboration to improve prostate cancer care through joint efforts is the MUSIC Project, currently being implemented in Michigan.

The main goals of the MUSIC project are the measurement of peri-operative morbidity, analysis of patient-reported functional outcomes, and the assessment of technical skills.

“We were not measuring winners or losers, but measuring to improve,” said David Miller (US). Technical skills assessment can become a performance measurement and can be used for resident evaluation. Eventually, this could lead to hospital credentialing, hiring and board certification. Most importantly, it can lead to collaborative learning, and improvement.

Assessments are costly, so the group tried a new approach: what if the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ could help lower the costs while maintaining the quality of the evaluation? They turned to crowdsourcing.

Seventy-six video clips from 12 different stages of robotic prostatectomies were recorded and shown to at least four expert reviewers, and between 30 and 55 online crowd-sourced reviewers. The results were surprising: “We got 1,500 valid crowd scores in less than nine hours, and a strong correlation between crowd and expert grades,” Miller added. This was especially true for the rank order of lower scoring surgeons.

The crowd provided very detailed and useful feedback, despite lack of medical training. Therefore, video assessment by peers or the crowd is feasible and this approach shows that even the non-specialist group is able to identify measurable differences in surgical techniques from medical professionals. In order to establish crowdsourcing as an assessment tool these preliminary results should, and will, be confirmed with a larger sample size, and the skill scores correlated with perioperative and functional outcomes.

“Undoubtedly, better skills will lead to improved patient care and more effective and efficient healthcare, which will ultimately benefit physicians, patients and payers,” said Miller.

Share this article

About EAU
  • Who we are
  • How we work
  • Become a member
Services
  • MyEAU
  • Congress registrations
  • Abstract submission
Media
  • EAU News
  • EAU Newsletter
  • EAU Press Releases
Contact
  • EAU Central Office
    PO Box 30016
    NL-6803 AA ARNHEM
    The Netherlands

  • Contact us
About EAU
Who we areHow we workBecome a member
Services
MyEAUCongress registrationsAbstract submission
Media
EAU NewsEAU NewsletterEAU Press Releases
Contact

EAU Central Office
PO Box 30016
NL-6803 AA ARNHEM
The Netherlands

Contact us
European Association of Urology
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer