From the viewpoint of Challengers: A UROBESTT2025 report
What was it like for residents and junior urologists to give their presentations under the discerning critique of seasoned urologists? What makes presentations impactful and effective? This report features the experiences and impressions of the Challengers, as well as the highlights of the recently concluded URO Berlin Skills Teaching and Training (UROBESTT25), which took place from 22 to 24 May 2025.
What was UROBESTT25?
UROBESTT25 offered an array of best practices, tips and tricks, and hands-on training (HOT) on endoscopic stone treatment programme step 2 (ESTs2), Laparoscopic urological skills - Step 1 (LUSs1/EBLUS), and Laparoscopic urological skills – Step 2 (VU Anastomosis and MVI) on 10 dedicated stations.
The programme addressed current clinical and surgical challenges in urology, including complications in endourology, minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and management of complex oncological cases such as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and penile cancer. Sessions examined the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnostics and stone management, laser safety protocols, and emerging technologies for surgical training. Comparative approaches to cystectomy, urinary diversion, and biopsy precision were also discussed, alongside strategies for improving academic publishing in the field.
The Scientific Committee members comprised experts European School of Urology (ESU) Chair Prof. Evangelos Liatsikos (GR), Prof. Joan Palou (ES), Prof. Bhaskar Somani (GB), and Prof. Olivier Traxer (FR).
Getting the message across
One of the highlights of UROBESTT25 was the Challenger Sessions, where promising final-year residents and young urologists presented their research and patient cases to a panel of experts, who also evaluated content and delivery of presentations.
“I saw the Challenger Sessions as a unique opportunity to test and refine my oratory skills in a dynamic yet more relaxed environment, without the usual rush and pressure of large congresses. The faculty shared practical tips on presentation delivery that felt almost like an acting masterclass. Their guidance transformed the way I approach both the preparation and delivery of a lecture, and I now feel far more confident and effective on stage”, shared Dr. Carlotta Nedbal (IT).
She added, “One comment that deeply resonated with me came from Prof. Traxer. While discussing the emotional aspects of public speaking, he reminded me that presenting should be an enjoyable experience. He said that when we’re on stage, we must embrace the moment and have fun, because being there means we’ve earned it. That perspective helped me shift from feeling anxious to feeling grateful and proud to share my work and insights with others.”
Dr. Nedbal presented “Utility of multimedia tools and VR for surgical training and patient information" and "Current applications and future promises of artificial intelligence in endoscopic stone treatment".
“I wanted to share my research with peers and leading experts, and to challenge myself in a high-level academic setting,” said Dr. Maria Florencia Frascheri (GB) on her motivation to join the Challenger Sessions.
“I also gained a clearer understanding of how to structure a concise and impactful scientific presentation. I received valuable feedback on the importance of adding proper citations, keeping slides brief, and using short videos to enhance understanding. The experts advised interacting with the audience, which I managed to do. I should keep on improving in terms of varying my tone of voice and managing my timing more effectively.”
Dr. Frascheri presented “Endourology devices, tips and tricks" and "UTUC/ oncology and how to manage tumours in the ongoing time".
Second-prize winner Dr. Marko Vukovic (MNE) presented “Radical cystectomy versus alternative therapies for BCG unresponsive NMIBC" and "Oligometastatic bladder cancer - treatment strategy". He, too, aimed to evaluate and improve his presentation skills. In addition, he wanted to challenge his knowledge on the topics I’ve defended as a Challenger. “The most valuable feedback I received was to present at a slower and clearer pace, and the most valuable skills I gained were being able to engage the audience during and presenting with a high level of expertise.”
First-prize winner of the Challenger Sessions, Dr. Valentina Spingler (DE), who presented “Challenges in penile cancer” and “Osteoprotection in prostate cancer”, said, “I participated because I wanted to gain more experience and confidence in giving a lecture, as well as to connect with peers facing similar challenges. I learned that it’s more impactful to simplify and focus the content rather than to rush. Clarity and pacing truly make the difference,” shared Dr. Spingler.
She added that the most valuable insight she received was the importance of structure and reinforcement in delivering a clear message. Dr. Spingler stated, “It showed me that a well-organised presentation helps ensure the audience remembers the key takeaway. This feedback helped me rethink how I design and prioritise content.”
