European Association of Urology
Guidelines
Education & Events
Join our events Join our events
On-demand education Learn at your own pace
Scholarships Enrich your capabilities
Exchange Programmes Urology beyond Europe
Education Educational Platforms Talent Incubator Programme Accreditation
Science & Publications
Publications Our publications
Research & Science Passionate about research?
About
Who we are Our mission and history
Our Board and Offices How we work
Join the EAU Find out about membership
Vacancies Contact

Surgical navigation still saddled with technical limits

Sun, 13 Apr 2014

Despite the entry of more navigation systems for various surgical applications in recent years, the widespread use of these systems are hampered by numerous technical limits and high costs which discourage many surgeons to fully rely on these instruments.

“Navigation systems are not commonplace and only for a comparatively small number of applications,” said Dr. Jan Stallkamp, of the Fraunhofer Project Group for Automation in Medicine & Biotechnology (PAMB) in Mannheim, Germany.

Stallkamp, who lectured in a thematic session on new technologies at the 29th Annual EAU Congress currently held in Stockholm and wrote a supplemental article on new technologies for the EUT Congress Newsletter, said there is a gap between the overall interest among surgeons and the everyday practicality of using navigation systems.

“Current navigation systems are costly while only providing some additional information for orientation,” said Stallkamp, as he noted that these extra information can prove to be very useful in specific clinical applications.

“The main problem is that they require a specialist operator. The information provided by the systems has to be interpreted carefully and introduces new sources of error,” he pointed out.

He added the imbalance between benefit and potential harms or side-effects argues against the widespread use of state-of-the-art navigation systems. For navigation systems to be considered as indispensible tools, there should be improvement in information quality and easy handling, such as a shorter set-up time of around five minutes.

Moreover, there is a demand for such systems to perform more tasks in the intervention room to justify development efforts.

In other words, Stallkamp said “…the full potential or benefits of navigation systems have not been exhausted yet.”

One of the limits that he cited was the inability of current navigation methods to cope with the geometrical changes of soft tissues during an intervention.

“A multimodal sensor solution could deliver sufficient data for precise real-time navigation with a holistic image of the surgical situation,” he said, adding that many enabling technologies are not yet available and neither do the mechanical, electronic or organisational interfaces exist.

Looking ahead, Stallkamp said future navigation systems would have automated features or functions that could lead to automated diagnostic systems. But the evolution to these sophisticated features are still in their nascent stage and the process remains complex due to the sequential nature of the required technical developments.

Source: Thematic Session 2: J. Stallkamp, “Surgical navigation for diagnosis and treatment”; 13 April 2014; 29th Annual EAU Congress, Stockholm, Sweden

Share this article

About EAU
  • Who we are
  • How we work
  • Become a member
Services
  • MyEAU
  • Congress registrations
  • Abstract submission
Media
  • EAU News
  • EAU Newsletter
  • EAU Press Releases
Contact
  • EAU Central Office
    PO Box 30016
    NL-6803 AA ARNHEM
    The Netherlands

  • Contact us
About EAU
Who we areHow we workBecome a member
Services
MyEAUCongress registrationsAbstract submission
Media
EAU NewsEAU NewsletterEAU Press Releases
Contact

EAU Central Office
PO Box 30016
NL-6803 AA ARNHEM
The Netherlands

Contact us
European Association of Urology
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer