7. REFERENCES
1.Skolarikos, A., et al. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 750.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25454613
2.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 468.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318710
3.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 475.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344917
4.Phillips, B., et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Updated by Jeremy Howick March 2009. 2009.
5.Sorokin, I., et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 1301.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28213860
6.Monga, M., et al. Prevalence of Stone Disease and Procedure Trends in the United States. Urology, 2023. 176: 63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062518
7.Stamatelou, K.K., et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1817.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12675858
8.Hesse, A., et al. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol, 2003. 44: 709.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14644124
9.Zhe, M., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a risk factor of chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies with 4,770,691 participants. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 441.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837248
10.Corrales, M., et al. Classification of Stones According to Michel Daudon: A Narrative Review. Eur Urol Focus, 2021. 7: 13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33288482
11.Halbritter, J. Genetics of kidney stone disease-Polygenic meets monogenic. Nephrol Ther, 2021. 17S: S88.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910705
12.Siener, R., et al. Mixed stones: urinary stone composition, frequency and distribution by gender and age. Urolithiasis, 2024. 52: 24.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38189998
13.Leusmann, D.B. Whewellite, weddellite and company: where do all the strange names originate? BJU Int, 2000. 86: 411.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10971263
14.Strohmaier, W.L. Course of calcium stone disease without treatment. What can we expect? Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 339.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10720863
15.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Risk of recurrence of idiopathic calcium kidney stones: analysis of data from the literature. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 227.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969574
16.Keoghane, S., et al. The natural history of untreated renal tract calculi. BJU Int, 2010. 105: 1627.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438563
17.Straub, M., et al. Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol, 2005. 23: 309.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16315051
18.Pawar, A.S., et al. Incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients with horseshoe kidney: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann, 2018. 10: 87.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416282
19.Dissayabutra, T., et al. Urinary stone risk factors in the descendants of patients with kidney stone disease. Pediatr Nephrol, 2018. 33: 1173.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594505
20.Hu, H., et al. Association between Circulating Vitamin D Level and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 2017. 9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335477
21.Geraghty, R.M., et al. Worldwide Impact of Warmer Seasons on the Incidence of Renal Colic and Kidney Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review of Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 729.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28338351
22.Guo, Z.L., et al. Association between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018. 97: e9460.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505519
23.Hesse, A.T., Tiselius H-G,. Siener R., et al. (Eds.), Urinary Stones, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence. 3rd edition. . 2009, Basel.
24.Basiri, A., et al. Familial relations and recurrence pattern in nephrolithiasis: new words about old subjects. Urol J, 2010. 7: 81.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535692
25.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int, 2005. 67: 1053.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15698445
26.Asplin, J.R., et al. Hyperoxaluria in kidney stone formers treated with modern bariatric surgery. J Urol, 2007. 177: 565.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222634
27.Gonzalez, R.D., et al. Kidney stone risk following modern bariatric surgery. Curr Urol Rep, 2014. 15: 401.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658828
28.Rendina, D., et al. Metabolic syndrome and nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence. J Nephrol, 2014. 27: 371.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696310
29.Dell’Orto, V.G., et al. Metabolic disturbances and renal stone promotion on treatment with topiramate: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2014. 77: 958.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24219102
30.Mufti, U.B., et al. Nephrolithiasis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1557.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818989
31.Chen, Y., et al. Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Spinal Cord, 2000. 38: 346.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10889563
32.Hara, A., et al. Incidence of nephrolithiasis in relation to environmental exposure to lead and cadmium in a population study. Environ Res, 2016. 145: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613344
33.Gambaro, G., et al. The Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Urolithiasis and its Urological Treatments: A Review. J Urol, 2017. 198: 268.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286070
34.Lucato, P., et al. Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int, 2016. 27: 3155.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27289533
35.Jia, S., et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with nephrolithiasis and vice versa: a cumulative analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023. 14: 1180183.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469974
36.Zhou, L.T., et al. Association between Kidney Stones and CKD: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2024. 35: 1746.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39102294
37.Abdulrhman, A., et al. Urolithiasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13,339,065 individuals. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023. 102: e33938.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327280
38.Wu, H., et al. Inflammatory bowel disease increases the levels of albuminuria and the risk of urolithiasis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Eur J Med Res, 2023. 28: 167.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173785
39.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. A Twin Study of Genetic Influences on Nephrolithiasis in Women and Men. Kidney Int Rep, 2019. 4: 535.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993229
40.Wray, N., et al. Estimating trait heritability. Nature education, 2008. 1: 29.
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/estimating-trait-heritability-46889/
41.Gefen, A.M., et al. Genetic testing in children with nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol, 2023. 38: 2615.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688940
42.Halbritter, J., et al. Fourteen monogenic genes account for 15% of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015. 26: 543.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25296721
43.Anderegg, M.A., et al. Prevalence and characteristics of genetic disease in adult kidney stone formers. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2024. 39: 1426.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38544324
44.Geraghty, R., et al. Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review. Curr Urol Rep, 2024. 25: 311.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39096463
45.Alharbi, S.A., et al. The Role of Genetic Testing in Pediatric Renal Diseases: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Social Implications. Cureus, 2023. 15: e44490.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37664254
46.Wang, Y., et al. Genetic Links between Gastrointestinal Disorders and Kidney Stone Disease: Insights from a Genome-Wide Cross-Trait Analysis. Kidney360, 2025. 6: 616.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39752564
47.Geraghty, R., et al. Which Measure of Stone Burden is the Best Predictor of Interventional Outcomes in Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the YAU Urolithiasis Working Group and EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2025. 71: 22.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39651399
48.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol, 2010. 25: 403.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19104842
49.Kim, S.C., et al. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2007. 35: 319.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17965956
50.McGrath, T.A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2020. 30: 2791.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980881
51.Dahm, P., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical signs, symptoms, and imaging findings in patients with suspected renal colic. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2022. 3: e12831.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474707
52.Ray, A.A., et al. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology, 2010. 76: 295.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20206970
53.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371: 1100.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229916
54.Heidenreich, A., et al. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol, 2002. 41: 351.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12074804
55.Kennish, S.J., et al. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clin Radiol, 2008. 63: 1131.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18774360
56.Worster, A., et al. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med, 2002. 40: 280.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12192351
57.Wu, D.S., et al. Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 557.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11148725
58.Yamashita, S., et al. Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases. Biomed Res Int, 2018. 2018: 9253952.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627582
59.Wiesenthal, J.D., et al. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Urol Res, 2010. 38: 307.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20625891
60.Kluner, C., et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006. 30: 44.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16365571
61.Caoili, E.M., et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology, 2002. 222: 353.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11818599
62.Van Der Molen, A.J., et al. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol, 2008. 18: 4.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17973110
63.Thomson, J.M., et al. Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose. Australas Radiol, 2001. 45: 291.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11531751
64.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Computed Tomography Radiation Dose in Patients With Suspected Urolithiasis. JAMA Intern Med, 2015. 175: 1413.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121191
65.Rodger, F., et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2018. 100: 375.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649823
66.Saikiran, P. Effectiveness of Low Dose Over Standard dose CT for Detection of Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 2020. 14: 4447.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831206/pdf/12961_2018_Article_298.pdf
67.Moore, C.L., et al. Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. J Urol, 2019. 202: 475.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412438
68.Poletti, P.A., et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 927.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17377025
69.Xiang, H., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2017. 61: 582.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139077
70.Mandel, N., et al. Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J Urol, 2003. 169: 2026.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12771710
71.Kourambas, J., et al. Role of stone analysis in metabolic evaluation and medical treatment of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 181.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11325090
72.Hesse, A., et al. Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001). Clin Chem Lab Med, 2005. 43: 298.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15843235
73.Abdel-Halim, R.E., et al. A review of urinary stone analysis techniques. Saudi Med J, 2006. 27: 1462.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17013464
74.Gilad, R., et al. Interpreting the results of chemical stone analysis in the era of modern stone analysis techniques. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 135.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956131
75.Thiruchelvam, N., et al. Planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy using multidetector computed tomography urography, multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reformatting. BJU Int, 2005. 95: 1280.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15892817
76.Bonkat, G., et al., EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 43rd EAU Annual Meeting, London, E.A.o.U.G. Office, Editor. 2026, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.
https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections
77.Williams, J.C., Jr., et al. Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference. Urolithiasis, 2021. 49: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048172
78.Somani, B.K., et al. Review on diagnosis and management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: an ESUT practical guide for urologists. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 1637.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424869
79.Asrat, T., et al. Ultrasonographic detection of ureteral jets in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998. 178: 1194.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9662301
80.Swartz, M.A., et al. Admission for nephrolithiasis in pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 109: 1099.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470589
81.Patel, S.J., et al. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics, 2007. 27: 1705.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025513
82.Juan, Y.S., et al. Management of symptomatic urolithiasis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2007. 23: 241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525006
83.Opinion, C. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation: Correction. Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 132: 786.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134410
84.Masselli, G., et al. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging, 2014. 5: 691.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249333
85.(MHRA), M.a.H.p.R.A., Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment in Clinical Use, MHRA, Editor. 2015, MHRA.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/safety-guidelines-for-magnetic-resonance-imaging-equipment-in-clinical-use
86.committee, T.A.C.o.O.a.G.A.W.s.h.c.p. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 130: e210.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937575
87.Practice, A.I.o.U.i.M., AIUM Practice parameter for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations 2013, A.P.P.f.t.P.o.O.U. Examinations, Editor. 2013, AIUM.
http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/obstetric.pdf
88.Administration, U.S.F.D. Avoid Fetal “Keepsake” Images, Heartbeat Monitors. 2014. 2018.
https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095508.htm
89.Sharp, C., et al., Diagnostic Medical Exposures: Advice on Exposure to Ionising Radiation during Pregnancy. 1998, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0RQ.
90.Kanal, E., et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 1447.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17515363
91.Roy, C., et al. Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography. Eur Radiol, 1996. 6: 334.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8798002
92.White, W.M., et al. Predictive value of current imaging modalities for the detection of urolithiasis during pregnancy: a multicenter, longitudinal study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 931.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23017526
93.Sternberg, K., et al. Pediatric stone disease: an evolving experience. J Urol, 2005. 174: 1711.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16148688
94.Bernardor, J., et al. Pediatric urolithiasis: what can pediatricians expect from radiologists? Pediatr Radiol, 2023. 53: 695.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329164
95.Authors on behalf of, I., et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP, 2012. 41: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22925378
96.Protection, I.C.o.R. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, 2007. 37.
97.Passerotti, C., et al. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol, 2009. 182: 1829.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692054
98.Palmer, L.S. Pediatric urologic imaging. Urol Clin North Am, 2006. 33: 409.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16829274
99.Darge, K., et al. [Modern ultrasound technologies and their application in pediatric urinary tract imaging]. Radiologe, 2005. 45: 1101.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16086170
100.Pepe, P., et al. Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol, 2005. 53: 131.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15607864
101.Morrison, J.C., et al. Use of Ultrasound in Pediatric Renal Stone Diagnosis and Surgery. Curr Urol Rep, 2017. 18: 22.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233230
102.Stratton, K.L., et al. Implications of ionizing radiation in the pediatric urology patient. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2137.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20399463
103.Grivas, N., et al. Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel. J Pediatr Urol, 2020. 16: 612.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32739360
104.Niemann, T., et al. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008. 191: 396.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18647908
105.Rob, S., et al. Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol, 2017. 72: 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27810168
106.Leppert, A., et al. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced? J Pediatr Surg, 2002. 37: 1441.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12378450
107.Pathan, S.A., et al. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016. 387: 1999.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993881
108.Pathan, S.A., et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic. Eur Urol, 2018. 73: 583.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29174580
109.Forouzanfar, M.M., et al. Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen with Intravenous Ketorolac in Renal Colic Pain Management; A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med, 2019. 9: e86963.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881914
110.Gu, H.Y., et al. Increasing Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Reducing Opioids or Paracetamol in the Management of Acute Renal Colic: Based on Three-Stage Study Design of Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol, 2019. 10: 96.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853910
111.Schmidt, M., et al. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ, 2018. 362: k3426.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181258
112.Coxib, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet, 2013. 382: 769.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23726390
113.Gohtama, S., et al. Exploring intradermal sterile water injection as an alternative to natrium diclofenac for kidney-stone related pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urologia, 2025. 92: 21.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39344477
114.Moussa, M., et al. Intradermal sterile water injection versus diclofenac sodium in acute renal colic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med, 2021. 44: 395.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32444296
115.Holdgate, A., et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005. 2004: CD004137.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15846699
116.Safaie, A., et al. Intravenous morphine plus ibuprofen or ketorolac versus intravenous morphine alone in reducing renal colic pain intensity in emergency department: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Turk J Emerg Med, 2022. 22: 8.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284698
117.Zhang, D., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine Versus Opiates in the Treatment of Patients with Renal Colic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Ther, 2023. 12: 1079.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284927
118.Beltaief, K., et al. Acupuncture versus titrated morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res, 2018. 11: 335.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29483783
119.Kaynar, M., et al. Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic. Am J Emerg Med, 2015. 33: 749.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827597
120.Holdgate, A., et al. Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ, 2004. 328: 1401.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15178585
121.Lee, A., et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007. 2007: CD002765.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443518
122.Hollingsworth, J.M., et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2016. 355: i6112.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27908918
123.Guercio, S., et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol, 2011. 25: 1137.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682597
124.Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D.E., et al. Emergent urinary decompression in acute stone-related urinary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2021. 16: 19.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20514158211017027
125.Zul Khairul Azwadi, I., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 2021. 11: 6613.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758312
126.Weltings, S., et al. Lessons from Literature: Nephrostomy Versus Double J Ureteral Catheterization in Patients with Obstructive Urolithiasis-Which Method Is Superior? J Endourol, 2019. 33: 777.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250680
127.Wang, C.J., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 415.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26662171
128.Bonkat, G., et al. Management of Urosepsis in 2018. Eur Urol Focus, 2019. 5: 5.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448051
129.Evans, L., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med, 2021. 47: 1181.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691
130.Pietropaolo, A., et al. Outcomes of Elective Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones in Patients with Prior Urosepsis and Emergency Drainage: Prospective Study over 5 yr from a Tertiary Endourology Centre. Eur Urol Focus, 2020. 6: 151.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219711
131.Dellabella, M., et al. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2005. 174: 167.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15947613
132.Borghi, L., et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol, 1994. 152: 1095.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8072071
133.Porpiglia, F., et al. Effectiveness of nifedipine and deflazacort in the management of distal ureter stones. Urology, 2000. 56: 579.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11018608
134.Dellabella, M., et al. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology, 2005. 66: 712.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16230122
135.Yilmaz, E., et al. The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alpha1-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2010.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879806
136.Liu, X.J., et al. Role of silodosin as medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 211.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365782
137.Hsu, Y.P., et al. Silodosin versus tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2018. 13: e0203035.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153301
138.Ziaeefar, P., et al. Medical Expulsive Therapy for Pediatric Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Med, 2023. 12.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835945
139.Pickard, R., et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2015. 386: 341.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998582
140.Furyk, J.S., et al. Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Ann Emerg Med, 2016. 67: 86.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194935
141.Sur, R.L., et al. Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 959.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25465978
142.Turk, C., et al. Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureterolithiasis: The EAU Recommendations in 2016. Eur Urol, 2017. 71: 504.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506951
143.Taheri, M., et al. Which combination of medical expulsive therapy is more effective for treatment of distal ureteral stone in adults? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 18.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39875883
144.Ebrahimpour, S., et al. Comparing efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol, 2025. 12: 189.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40458580
145.Belkovsky, M., et al. Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2023. 49: 668.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903004
146.Kachrilas, S., et al. The current role of percutaneous chemolysis in the management of urolithiasis: review and results. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 323.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743991
147.Ong, A., et al. Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2023. 24: 355.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079196
148.El-Gamal, O., et al. Role of combined use of potassium citrate and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 219.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21858663
149.Elbaset, M.A., et al. Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 207.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944968
150.Musa, A.A. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2008. 40: 19.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394095
151.Shen, P., et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1328.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21855945
152.Wang, H., et al. Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0167670.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28068364
153.Platonov, M.A., et al. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: evidence-based guidelines for the modern era. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 243.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294028
154.Li, W.M., et al. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int, 2007. 79: 124.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17851280
155.Yilmaz, E., et al. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urology, 2005. 66: 1160.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16360432
156.Pace, K.T., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol, 2005. 174: 595.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16006908
157.Madbouly, K., et al. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 127.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15592053
158.Semins, M.J., et al. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2008. 179: 194.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001796
159.Li, K., et al. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1260.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538240
160.Nguyen, D.P., et al. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 418.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25661296
161.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 537.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16903810
162.Kang, D.H., et al. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2016. 11: e0158661.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387279
163.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy versus slow power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in stones with high attenuation value: A randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2020. 27: 165.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31793084
164.Connors, B.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int, 2009. 104: 1004.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338532
165.Moon, K.B., et al. Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Urol, 2012. 53: 790.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185672
166.Ng, C.F., et al. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute. J Urol, 2012. 188: 837.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22819406
167.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones: A randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32985780
168.Lopez-Acon, J.D., et al. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Increasing the Energy Dose Applied Per Session by Increasing the Number of Shock Waves in Extracorporeal Lithotripsy: A Prospective and Comparative Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1289.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29048206
169.Connors, B.A., et al. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int, 2009. 103: 104.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18680494
170.Handa, R.K., et al. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int, 2012. 110: E1041.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22612388
171.Skuginna, V., et al. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 267.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119561
172.Maloney, M.E., et al. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 603.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16999607
173.Demirci, D., et al. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 1407.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18044996
174.Honey, R.J., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology, 2010. 75: 38.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19896176
175.Ng, C.F., et al. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Urol, 2019. 202: 986.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112104
176.Abdelbary, A.M., et al. Value of early second session shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of upper ureteric stones compared to laser ureteroscopy. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3089.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471164
177.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol, 2006. 176: 2706.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17085200
178.Tailly, G.G., et al. Optical coupling control: an important step toward better shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1368.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978424
179.Jain, A., et al. Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1680.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17112655
180.Van Besien, J., et al. Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study. Biomed Res Int, 2017. 2017: 7802672.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589147
181.Eichel, L., et al. Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-generation lithotripters. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 671.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11697394
182.Sorensen, C., et al. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol, 2002. 168: 35.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12050487
183.Cleveland, R.O., et al. Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol, 2004. 18: 629.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15597649
184.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2017. 43: 394.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28338301
185.Honey, R.J., et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 2112.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23276509
186.Lu, Y., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for shock wave lithotripsy in patients with sterile urine before treatment may be unnecessary: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2012. 188: 441.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22704118
187.Tikkinen, K.A.O., et al. Update on APPEAL, an International Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Ciprofloxacin Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus, 2024. 10: 697.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39112135
188.Oestreich, M.C., et al. Alpha-blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020. 11: CD013393.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179245
189.Yuan, C., et al. Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 712.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972194
190.Tzelves, L., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Complications According to Modified Clavien-Dindo Grading System. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis in a Sample of 115 Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1452.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848163
191.Preminger, G.M., et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol, 2007. 52: 1610.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18074433
192.Lingeman, J.E., et al. Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis. JAMA, 1990. 263: 1789.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2313851
193.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol, 2006. 175: 1742.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16600747
194.Eassa, W.A., et al. Prospective study of the long-term effects of shock wave lithotripsy on renal function and blood pressure. J Urol, 2008. 179: 964.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18207167
195.Yu, C., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 719.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24162890
196.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Long-term Adverse Effects of Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Urology, 2015. 85: 991.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917723
197.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes after exposure to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi: a retrospective non-randomized data analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2018. 50: 1227.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785660
198.Ather, M.H., et al. Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications? Urol Int, 2009. 83: 222.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19752621
199.Madbouly, K., et al. Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1239.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11832705
200.Sayed, M.A., et al. Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int, 2001. 88: 675.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11890235
201.Skolarikos, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention. Eur Urol, 2006. 50: 981.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16481097
202.Osman, M.M., et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2005. 47: 860.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15925084
203.Tan, Y.M., et al. Clinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospital. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2002. 36: 363.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12487741
204.Muller-Mattheis, V.G., et al. Bacteremia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi. J Urol, 1991. 146: 733.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1875482
205.Maker, V., et al. Gastrointestinal injury secondary to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a review of the literature since its inception. J Am Coll Surg, 2004. 198: 128.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14698320
206.Chen, C.S., et al. Subcapsular hematoma of spleen--a complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculus. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi, 1992. 15: 215.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1295657
207.Kim, T.B., et al. Life-threatening complication after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a renal stone: a hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Korean J Urol, 2010. 51: 212.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20414400
208.Ng, C.F., et al. Hepatic haematoma after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 785.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22782117
209.Wendt-Nordahl, G., et al. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res, 2011. 39: 185.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21052986
210.Wang, Q., et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0171478.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182718
211.Wang, Y., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662708
212.Deng, T., et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1687.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30430253
213.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1257.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22642568
214.Geraghty, R., et al. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep, 2015. 16: 54.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077357
215.Binbay, M., et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1929.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21043835
216.Yaghoubian, A.J., et al. Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol, 2023. 209: 963.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36753676
217.Dingwall, A., et al. Ureteroscopy and lasertripsy for lower pole stones <2 cm, in situ vs displacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2025. 135: 399.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39400510
218.Luo, Z., et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2020. 82: 36.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858209
219.Schembri, M., et al. Outcomes of loco-regional anaesthesia in ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2020. 30: 726.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657841
220.Omar, M., et al. Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 3075.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208314
221.Anastos, H., et al. Reverse Trendelenburg Positioning Minimizes Stone Retropulsion During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 660.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051709
222.Lepine, H.L., et al. Impact of Either Trendelenburg or Reverse Trendelenburg Positioning for Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol, 2025. 213: 8.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39348719
223.Wu, T., et al. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2017. 99: 308.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586770
224.Agrawal, S., et al. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3957.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970313
225.Belkovsky, M., et al. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis. Urolithiasis, 2024. 52: 37.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38413490
226.Van Compernolle, D., et al. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1454.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33775101
227.Dragos, L.B., et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol, 2019. 8: S359.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656742
228.Davis, N.F., et al. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 214.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373918
229.Davis, N.F., et al. Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for Fluoroscopic and Fluoroscopy-free Endourological Procedures: A Systematic Review on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol Focus, 2023. 9: 938.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277273
230.Serrao Gimenez, L.G., et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-free and conventional retrograde ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2025. 77: 162.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40167259
231.Dickstein, R.J., et al. Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1589.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836719
232.Eandi, J.A., et al. Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1653.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18721045
233.Ulvik, O., et al. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol, 2013. 27: 1197.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23795760
234.Ambani, S.N., et al. Ureteral stents for impassable ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2013. 27: 549.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066997
235.Pace, K.T., et al. Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study. J Urol, 2017. 198: 130.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163031
236.Ge, H., et al. Bilateral Same-Session Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1169.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626367
237.Leighton, J., et al. Effect of infundibulopelvic angle on outcomes of ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 413.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39012390
238.Shrestha, A., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge? World J Urol, 2023. 41: 3345.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728745
239.Dragos, L.B., et al. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 630.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28478744
240.Lane, J., et al. Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 17.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211985
241.Osther, P.J.S., et al. Understanding intrarenal backflow: Intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopy and beyond. Asian J Urol, 2024. 11: 139.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38680595
242.Pauchard, F., et al. A Practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What Is the Evidence Telling Us. J Clin Med, 2022. 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743499
243.Chew, B.H., et al. Intrarenal Pressure Measured Using a Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Pressure Sensing Capabilities: A Study of the Effects of Ureteral Access Sheath, Irrigation, and Working Channel Accessories. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 1200.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725581
244.Ostergar, A., et al. Intrarenal Pressure with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheaths Using an In Situ Cadaveric Porcine Model. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 353.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355600
245.Bai, J., et al. Efficacy and intrarenal pressure analysis of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths with flexible ureteroscopy in modified surgical positions for 2-6 cm upper urinary tract stones: a multicenter retrospective study. Front Med (Lausanne), 2024. 11: 1501464.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39635581
246.Tang, Q.L., et al. RIRS with flexible vacuum-assisted UAS versus MPCNL for impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Urolithiasis, 2025. 53: 105.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40464967
247.Yang, C., et al. UreteroPyeloVisClear catheter: a new frontier in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Urolithiasis, 2025. 53: 97.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40411582
248.Chen, P., et al. Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2025. 57: 1051.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39656408
249.Ma, Q., et al. Comparison of two negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with day-case flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones randomized trial. Sci Rep, 2024. 14: 29092.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39580558
250.Alnadhari, I., et al. Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 115.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40336020
251.Goncalves, F.G.A., et al. Enhanced stone-free rates with suctioning ureteral access sheath vs. traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 86.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40217207
252.Liu, Q., et al. Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional ureteral access sheath for flexible ureteroscopy in renal and proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 127.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40389965
253.Zeng, G., et al. Flexible Ureteroscopy with a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones: An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol, 2026. 89: 45.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40533283
254.Aldoukhi, A.H., et al. Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1308.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29048216
255.Winship, B., et al. The Rise and Fall of High Temperatures During Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 794.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016991
256.Wollin, D.A., et al. Effect of Laser Settings and Irrigation Rates on Ureteral Temperature During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, an In Vitro Model. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 59.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29048226
257.MS, A.E., et al. Temperature Measurements During Flexible Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Prospective Clinical Trial. J Endourol, 2024. 38: 308.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38185920
258.MS, A.E., et al. Temperature profiles during ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser: Findings from a pre-clinical study. Scand J Urol, 2022. 56: 313.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924316
259.Juliebo-Jones, P., et al. Holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser Safety in Endourological Practice: What Does the Clinician Need to Know? Curr Urol Rep, 2023. 24: 409.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256486
260.Bai, J., et al. Intrarenal pressure detection during flexible ureteroscopy with fiber optic pressure sensor system in porcine model. Sci Rep, 2024. 14: 9446.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38658694
261.Ding, T., et al. Efficacy of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope versus 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones < 1. 5 cm: a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2025. 43: 384.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40549155
262.Stern, J.M., et al. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 119.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17338606
263.L’Esperance J, O., et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology, 2005. 66: 252.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16040093
264.Traxer, O., et al. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol, 2013. 189: 580.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22982421
265.Traxer, O., et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015. 33: 2137.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971204
266.Stern, K.L., et al. A Prospective Study Analyzing the Association Between High-grade Ureteral Access Sheath Injuries and the Formation of Ureteral Strictures. Urology, 2019. 128: 38.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30878681
267.Aykanat, C., et al. The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Size on Perioperative Parameters and Postoperative Ureteral Stricture in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 1013.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229631
268.Lima, A., et al. Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1329.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342247
269.Santiago, J.E., et al. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Curr Urol Rep, 2017. 18: 32.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271355
270.Bach, T., et al. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter? J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1639.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18620506
271.Leijte, J.A., et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 257.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294030
272.Pierre, S., et al. Holmium laser for stone management. World J Urol, 2007. 25: 235.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17340157
273.Ventimiglia, E., et al. High- and Low-Power Laser Lithotripsy Achieves Similar Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Available Clinical Series. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1146.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677987
274.Spinos, T., et al. High-power versus low-power laser settings during endoscopic stone disease management: a systematic review from the EAU endourology section. World J Urol, 2024. 43: 34.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39681789
275.Garcia Rojo, E., et al. Comparison of Low-Power vs High-Power Holmium Lasers in Pediatric Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Outcomes. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 509.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860192
276.Hao, X., et al. Comparison of conventional (basketing + dusting) and Moses (pop-dusting) holmium lasers during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones between 2 and 3 cm: a randomized clinical trial. Urolithiasis, 2024. 52: 89.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38874782
277.Kronenberg, P., et al. Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2021. 31: 80.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470684
278.Ulvik, O., et al. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol, 2022. 82: 73.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300888
279.Haas, C.R., et al. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol, 2023. 209: 374.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36621994
280.Uleri, A., et al. Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 2024. 85: 529.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38290963
281.Chen, R., et al. Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in lithotripsy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2025. 53: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39954083
282.Garg, S., et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study. Urol Int, 2009. 82: 341.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19440025
283.Binbay, M., et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 2011. 43: 989.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479563
284.Ahmed, M., et al. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology, 2009. 73: 976.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19394493
285.John, T.T., et al. Adjunctive tamsulosin improves stone free rate after ureteroscopic lithotripsy of large renal and ureteric calculi: a prospective randomized study. Urology, 2010. 75: 1040.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19819530
286.Croghan, S.M., et al. Intrarenal pressure with hand-pump or pressurized-bag irrigation: randomized clinical trial at retrograde intrarenal surgery. Br J Surg, 2024. 111.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38877843
287.Deng, X., et al. Fluid absorption during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 331.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38758400
288.Tzelves, L., et al. Suction use in ureterorenoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJUI Compass, 2024. 5: 895.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39416755
289.Chen, H., et al. The Outcomes of Pre-Stenting on Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2022. 106: 495.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788759
290.Calvillo-Ramirez, A., et al. Safety and effectiveness of preoperative stenting compared to non-stenting in ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol, 2024. 43: 12.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39630233
291.Law, Y.X.T., et al. Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 1377.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072738
292.Geraghty, R.M., et al. Post-Ureteroscopy Infections Are Linked to Pre-Operative Stent Dwell Time over Two Months: Outcomes of Three European Endourology Centres. J Clin Med, 2022. 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35054005
293.Ortolini, M., et al. Prolonged preoperative double J stenting increases post-ureteroscopy infectious complications. World J Urol, 2025. 43: 638.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41160126
294.Allam, C.L., et al. The Role of Routine Ureteral Stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Treatment for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Trial. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 257.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401514
295.Ordonez, M., et al. Reprint - Ureteral stent vs. no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi: A Cochrane review. Can Urol Assoc J, 2020. 14: 61.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348748
296.Ehsanullah, S.A., et al. Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann, 2022. 14: 295.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505999
297.Harrison, N.L., et al. Is Stent on a String the New Gold Standard for Postureteroscopy Ureteral Drainage? Evidence from a Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2024. 38: 159.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38115630
298.Bosio, A., et al. Patients undergoing double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent report a significant decrease of stent-related symptoms. Results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal trial. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 186.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38517489
299.Moon, T.D. Ureteral stenting--an obsolete procedure? J Urol, 2002. 167: 1984.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956423
300.Heidenberg, D.J., et al. Timing of Ureteral Stent Removal After Ureteroscopy on Stent-Related Symptoms: A Validated Questionnaire Comparison of 3 and 7 Days Stent Duration. J Endourol, 2024. 38: 82.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885220
301.Jian, Z., et al. Combination of solifenacin and tamsulosin may provide additional beneficial effects for ureteral stent-related symptoms-outcomes from a network meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 289.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30030658
302.Cheng, C., et al. The Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Ureteral Navigation, Operation, and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2023. 107: 557.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812907
303.Kim, J.K., et al. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 572.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33741297
304.Bhojani, N., et al. Effect of preoperative alpha-blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJUI Compass, 2024. 5: 613.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39022659
305.Dasgupta, R., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. Eur Urol, 2021. 80: 46.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810921
306.Perez Castro, E., et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol, 2014. 66: 102.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24507782
307.Bhojani, N., et al. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 991.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544019
308.De Coninck, V., et al. Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 2147.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748953
309.Moretto, S., et al. Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 234.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38613692
310.Bhanot, R., et al. Predictors and Strategies to Avoid Mortality Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Sections of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 598.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674255
311.Dupuis, H., et al. Preoperative risk factors for complications after flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for stone disease: A French multicentric study. Prog Urol, 2022. 32: 593.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314100
312.Chugh, S., et al. Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS). Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 16.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211969
313.Tokas, T., et al. Role of Intrarenal Pressure in Modern Day Endourology (Mini-PCNL and Flexible URS): a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2021. 22: 52.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622341
314.Zeng, G., et al. Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol, 2021. 79: 114.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994063
315.Ruhayel, Y., et al. Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol, 2017. 72: 220.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28237786
316.Castellani, D., et al. The Impact of Lasers in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 151.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314230
317.Ai, G.Y., et al. The value of 3D printing model combined PCNL in kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2024. 76: 389.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39051888
318.Cumpanas, A.D., et al. Preoperative Immersive Virtual Reality Applied to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of Surgical Planning and Clinical Outcomes. J Urol, 2025. 213: 162.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39481129
319.Keller, E.X., et al. Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33016031
320.Lachkar, S., et al. Supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,774 cases. Fr J Urol, 2025. 35: 102882.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40086594
321.Cracco, C.M., et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: S46.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877638
322.Abdullatif, V.A., et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Urol, 2022. 2022: 1716554.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898579
323.Wen, J., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg, 2016. 28: 22.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898135
324.Yang, Y.H., et al. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 777.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30244337
325.Du, R., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound- vs Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Managing Renal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urology, 2025. 198: 170.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39561909
326.Zhu, W., et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2017. 119: 612.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27862806
327.Isac, W., et al. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology, 2013. 81: 251.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374772
328.Taguchi, K., et al. Ureteroscopy-assisted puncture for ultrasonography-guided renal access significantly improves overall treatment outcomes in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 913.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028095
329.Srivastava, A., et al. A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 803.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614706
330.Armas-Phan, M., et al. Ultrasound guidance can be used safely for renal tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2020. 125: 284.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811835
331.Wu, Y., et al. Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med, 2020. 19: 2661.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256747
332.Mykoniatis, I., et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2022. 74: 409.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147386
333.Deng, J., et al. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg, 2021. 110: 301.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489145
334.Sharma, G., et al. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1376.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404619
335.Nizzardo, M., et al. Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med, 2024. 13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38731086
336.Liang, S., et al. Vacuum-Assisted vs Conventional Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Two-to-Four-Centimeter Stones: A Multicenter Prospective and Randomized Trial. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 1241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37756365
337.De Stefano, V., et al. Suction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, Development, and Outcomes from Experimental and Clinical studies. Results from a Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus, 2024. 10: 154.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37442721
338.Qi, Y., et al. Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a prospective randomized controlled study. Urolithiasis, 2024. 52: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38340170
339.Cracco, C.M., et al. Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017. 69: 330.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124870
340.Lu, Y., et al. Randomized prospective trial of tubeless versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1303.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22903789
341.Cormio, L., et al. Exit strategies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a comparison of surgical outcomes in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1239.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22752586
342.Chen, Z.J., et al. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg, 2020. 43: 60.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782495
343.Lee, J.Y., et al. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 48.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655317
344.Garofalo, M., et al. Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 347.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23632910
345.Wilhelm, K., et al. Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023. 7: CD012607.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503906
346.Fang, H., et al. Safety and efficacy of standard vs. tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric populations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 110.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40316976
347.Tania, C., et al. Comparison of External Ureteral Catheter and Double-J stent as Drainage Methods for Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2025. 51.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39556846
348.Jiang, H., et al. Improving Drainage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Based on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1131.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28891320
349.Seitz, C., et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol, 2012. 61: 146.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21978422
350.Liu, M., et al. Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures vs Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1467.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128382
351.Yu, J., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1685.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31562533
352.Yoshida, S., et al. The significance of intraoperative renal pelvic urine and stone cultures for patients at a high risk of post-ureteroscopy systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 533.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30758524
353.Zhong, W., et al. Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol, 2008. 22: 2147.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18811571
354.Wu, C., et al. Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 36.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088272
355.Croghan, S.M., et al. Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications. BJU Int, 2023. 131: 267.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485243
356.Baccaglini, W., et al. Tranexamic Acid Use for Hemorrhagic Events Prevention in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 906.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072547
357.Kallidonis, P., et al. Is There Any Clinical Benefit for Peri-operative Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep, 2021. 22: 65.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913084
358.Lee, M.J., et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 303.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569280
359.Cleveland, B., et al. Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an abridged Cochrane review. BJU Int, 2024. 133: 259.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037865
360.Wang, Z., et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between single-tract and multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of complex renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 731.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781020
361.Lepine, H.L., et al. Effect of irrigation solution temperature on complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2024. 76: 554.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38819387
362.Calvillo-Ramirez, A., et al. Comparative Outcomes of Day-case Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Conventional Inpatient Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology, 2025. 195: 214.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39313005
363.Du, K., et al. Comparing ambulatory to inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2025. 135: 380.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39632377
364.Winoker, J.S., et al. Opioid-Sparing Analgesic Effects of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 38.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314232
365.Wang, J., et al. The Effect of Local Anesthetic Infiltration Around Nephrostomy Tract on Postoperative Pain Control after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2016. 97: 125.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27379709
366.Zheng, C., et al. Efficiency and safety of quadratus lumborum block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Urolithiasis, 2022. 51: 12.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480122
367.Mariappan, P., et al. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 1610.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15821509
368.Deng, T., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int, 2018. 122: 29.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29232047
369.Gavi, F., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in stone surgery: a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol, 2025. 43: 144.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40029456
370.Chew, B.H., et al. A Single Dose of Intraoperative Antibiotics Is Sufficient to Prevent Urinary Tract Infection During Ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413885
371.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stone therapy. Curr Opin Urol, 2019. 29: 89.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668554
372.Gravas, S., et al. Postoperative infection rates in low risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a matched case control study. J Urol, 2012. 188: 843.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22819398
373.Danilovic, A., et al. One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2023. 49: 184.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515617
374.Jung, H.D., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2022. 17: e0267233.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427380
375.Sur, R.L., et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium. J Urol, 2021. 205: 1379.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369488
376.Zhou, G., et al. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2022. 51: 17.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515726
377.Talizin, T.B., et al. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2024. 50: 152.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38386786
378.Klingler, H.C., et al. Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol, 2003. 43: 75.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12507547
379.Kefer, J.C., et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in patients on anticoagulant therapy. J Urol, 2009. 181: 144.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19012931
380.Baron, T.H., et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med, 2013. 368: 2113.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23718166
381.Naspro, R., et al. Antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stent undergoing urologic surgery: is it still no man’s land? Eur Urol, 2013. 64: 101.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23428067
382.Eberli, D., et al. Urological surgery and antiplatelet drugs after cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2128.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20399452
383.Razvi, H., et al. Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1478.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712655
384.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Incidence and risk factors of renal hematoma: a prospective study of 1,300 SWL treatments. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419328
385.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Antiplatelet and anticoagulative medication during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1034.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851726
386.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 298.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22765861
387.Elkoushy, M.A., et al. Ureteroscopy in patients with coagulopathies is associated with lower stone-free rate and increased risk of clinically significant hematuria. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 195.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22555043
388.Sharaf, A., et al. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1217.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29048211
389.Hiller, S.C., et al. Ureteroscopy in Patients Taking Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative. J Urol, 2021. 205: 833.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33035142
390.Sahin, C., et al. Transient cessation of antiplatelet medication before percutaneous stone surgery: does it have any safety concern on bleeding related problems? Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 371.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27677484
391.Kuo, R.L., et al. Use of ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser in patients with bleeding diatheses. Urology, 1998. 52: 609.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9763079
392.Altay, B., et al. A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Lasers Med Sci, 2017. 32: 1615.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733910
393.Douketis, J.D., et al. Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest, 2022. 162: e207.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964704
394.Tikkinen, K.A.O., et al., EAU Guidelines on Thromboprophylaxis in Urological Surgery, in European Association of Urology Guidelines 2022. 2022, EAU: Arnhem, The Netherlands.
https://uroweb.org/guidelines/thromboprophylaxis
395.Leavitt, D.A., et al. Continuing aspirin therapy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: unsafe or under-utilized? J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1399.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393457
396.Otto, B.J., et al. The Effect of Continued Low Dose Aspirin Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Urol, 2018. 199: 748.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29107032
397.Rosenbluth, E., et al. The effects of continuing aspirin on blood loss and postoperative outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Am J Clin Exp Urol, 2023. 11: 50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923721
398.Hua, L., et al. The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pak J Med Sci, 2025. 41: 2092.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40735570
399.Delakas, D., et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol, 2003. 17: 201.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12816580
400.Scharwachter, W.H., et al. Health risk factors in the anesthesia population. J Clin Anesth, 2016. 32: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27290942
401.El-Nahas, A.R., et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1688.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17161522
402.Lee, J.Y., et al. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: 23988.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27035621
403.Ohmori, K., et al. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol, 1994. 151: 255.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8254823
404.Carey, S.W., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with calcified ipsilateral renal arterial or abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Urol, 1992. 148: 18.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1613866
405.Reeves, T., et al. Role of Endourological Procedures (PCNL and URS) on Renal Function: a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 21.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318942
406.Mehra, K., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2022. 106: 461.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045417
407.Shah, T.T., et al. Factors associated with spontaneous stone passage in a contemporary cohort of patients presenting with acute ureteric colic: results from the Multi-centre cohort study evaluating the role of Inflammatory Markers In patients presenting with acute ureteric Colic (MIMIC) study. BJU Int, 2019. 124: 504.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001912
408.Skolarikos, A., et al. The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 923.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482232
409.Yallappa, S., et al. Natural History of Conservatively Managed Ureteral Stones: Analysis of 6600 Patients. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 371.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29482379
410.Skolarikos, A., et al. Indications, prediction of success and methods to improve outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2010. 82: 56.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20593724
411.Guler, Y. Non-contrast computed tomography-based factors in predicting ESWL success: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Urol, 2023. 33: 27.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36202729
412.Wang, W., et al. Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg, 2022. 9: 736641.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252322
413.Drake, T., et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Eur Urol, 2017. 72: 772.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28456350
414.Wang, W., et al. Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol, 2021. 10: 2122.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159093
415.Alsawi, M., et al. Primary versus delayed ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2022. 17: 489.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221088687
416.Peng, C.X., et al. Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2023. 23: 56.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016405
417.Lai, S., et al. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg, 2020. 80: 205.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32622059
418.Sorensen, M.D., et al. Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse. N Engl J Med, 2022. 387: 506.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947709
419.Han, D.S., et al. The Durability of Active Surveillance in Patients with Asymptomatic Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 598.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044612
420.Inci, K., et al. Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2189.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17509315
421.Lovegrove, C.E., et al. Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long-term follow-up: systematic review over 25 years. BJU Int, 2022. 129: 442.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157218
422.Brandt, B., et al. Painful caliceal calculi. The treatment of small nonobstructing caliceal calculi in patients with symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1993. 27: 75.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8493473
423.Argyropoulos, A.N., et al. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol, 2010. 20: 154.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19898239
424.Srisubat, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014. 11: CD007044.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25418417
425.Sahinkanat, T., et al. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones. Urology, 2008. 71: 801.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279941
426.Danuser, H., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol, 2007. 52: 539.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17400366
427.Dorantes-Carrillo, L.A., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 259.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627307
428.Bosio, A., et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones </=2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1816.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466071
429.Kallidonis, P., et al. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones </=20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 711.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156200
430.Preminger, G.M. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 108.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16463145
431.Zheng, C., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 549.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26211003
432.Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D.E., et al. Endourological Management of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review, Bayesian Network Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Urology, 2025. 198: 193.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39716563
433.Manzoor, H., et al., Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, in StatPearls. 2025, StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32809722
434.Zheng, C., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 417.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170589
435.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 612.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25449204
436.Awedew, A.F., et al. Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Urolithiasis, 2023. 51: 87.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289253
437.Fayad, M.K., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis, 2022. 50: 113.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34807274
438.Pearle, M.S., et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2005.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879805
439.Kumar, A., et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol, 2015. 193: 160.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066869
440.Zhang, W., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 745.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531986
441.Junbo, L., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J, 2019. 16: 97.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30604405
442.Tsai, S.H., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020. 99: e19403.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150088
443.Zhang, H., et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi. Urol Int, 2019. 102: 153.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352443
444.Kallidonis, P., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol, 2020. 204: 427.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150506
445.Barone, B., et al. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 441.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083423
446.Liu, M., et al. Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2023. 109: 1481.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037590
447.Wiseman, O., et al. The PUrE randomised controlled trial 1: Clinical and cost effectiveness of flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones of </=10 mm. Eur Urol, 2025. 88: 179.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40268593
448.Manikandan, R., et al. Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? Urology, 2007. 69: 620.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17445636
449.Torricelli, F.C.M., et al. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up. J Endourol, 2020. 34: 63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595801
450.Madbouly, K., et al. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol, 2001. 165: 1415.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11342888
451.Abdelhamid, M., et al. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1227.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597174
452.Gupta, N.P., et al. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2000. 163: 24.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10604306
453.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography. J Urol, 2015. 193: 2002.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524240
454.Sumino, Y., et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2002. 168: 1344.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12352389
455.Liu, L.R., et al. Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013. 2013: CD008569.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24318643
456.Chiong, E., et al. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005. 65: 1070.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15922429
457.Chan, L.H., et al. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 510.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355100
458.Sebaey, A., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Mini- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI-PCNL) for renal stones 20–30 mm a prospective randomized study. African Journal of Urology, 2022. 28: 13.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12301-022-00278-7.pdf
459.Assimos, D.G., et al. The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 1989. 142: 263.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2746742
460.Segura, J.W. Current surgical approaches to nephrolithiasis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 1990. 19: 919.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2081519
461.Honeck, P., et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1209.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19538063
462.Bichler, K.H., et al. Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi. Urol Int, 1997. 59: 102.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9392057
463.Paik, M.L., et al. Is there a role for open stone surgery? Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 323.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10778474
464.Alivizatos, G., et al. Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? Curr Opin Urol, 2006. 16: 106.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16479213
465.Wang, X., et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2013. 190: 888.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23454154
466.Soltani, M.H., et al. Stented Versus Stentless Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017. 27: 1269.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28631946
467.Mao, T., et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res, 2021. 49: 300060520983136.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472474
468.Muller, P.F., et al. Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review. Arab J Urol, 2018. 16: 357.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140470
469.Mantica, G., et al. The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2022. 74: 169.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147384
470.Kumar, A., et al. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1248.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177768
471.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol, 2016. 42: 645.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564273
472.Torricelli, F.C.M., et al. Ureteroscopy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stone: a randomised trial. BJU Int, 2024. 134: 747.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39082627
473.Xiao, Y., et al. Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1441.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361956
474.Coptcoat, M.J., et al. The steinstrasse: a legacy of extracorporeal lithotripsy? Eur Urol, 1988. 14: 93.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3360043
475.Lucio, J., 2nd, et al. Steinstrasse predictive factors and outcomes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 477.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888699
476.Moursy, E., et al. Tamsulosin as an expulsive therapy for steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010. 44: 315.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20560802
477.Resim, S., et al. Role of tamsulosin in treatment of patients with steinstrasse developing after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005. 66: 945.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286100
478.Rabbani, S.M. Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy. Urol J, 2008. 5: 89.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18592460
479.Ibrahim, R.M., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the treatment of post-SWL steinstrasse: a randomized comparative study. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 345.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38777909
480.Lynch, M.F., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteric stent insertion for acute renal deobstruction: Consensus based guidance. British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology, 2008. 1: 120.
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1875974208000955?showall=true
481.Rebuck, D.A., et al. The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology, 2011. 77: 564.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21109293
482.Chew, B.H., et al. Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol, 2016. 195: 982.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26585680
483.Candau, C., et al. Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 18.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10671779
484.Brain, E., et al. Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol, 2021. 206: 526.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33904756
485.Olvera-Posada, D., et al. Natural History of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of Factors Related to Clinical Events and Intervention. Urology, 2016. 97: 46.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27421779
486.Portis, A.J., et al. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology, 2008. 71: 218.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18308087
487.Tokas, T., et al. Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 897.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27738806
488.Omar, M., et al. Contemporary Imaging Practice Patterns Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1122.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25963170
489.Rippel, C.A., et al. Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol, 2012. 188: 2246.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23083650
490.Tzelves, L., et al. Duration of Follow-up and Timing of Discharge from Imaging Follow-up, in Adult Patients with Urolithiasis After Surgical or Medical Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Guideline Panel on Urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus, 2023. 9: 188.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851252
491.Beck, E.M., et al. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol, 1991. 145: 6.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1984100
492.Zhou, Q., et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol, 2021. 34: 1569.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173939
493.Salehi-Pourmehr, H., et al. Management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg, 2023. 112: 105.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692055
494.Keenan, R.A., et al. Symptomatic Hydronephrosis and Ureteral Calculi in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review with a Proposed Management Protocol. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 1099.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345895
495.McKnoulty, M., et al. Spontaneous renal fornix rupture in pregnancy and the post partum period: a systematic review of outcomes and management. BMC Urol, 2020. 20: 116.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753038
496.Mokhmalji, H., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol, 2001. 165: 1088.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11257644
497.Tsai, Y.L., et al. Comparative study of conservative and surgical management for symptomatic moderate and severe hydronephrosis in pregnancy: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007. 86: 1047.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712643
498.Dai, J.C., et al. Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two. Urology, 2021. 151: 44.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866511
499.Mason, M.M., et al. A comparison of adverse pregnancy events between ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy: A propensity score-matched analysis of a large multi-institutional research network. World J Urol, 2023. 41: 1721.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909212
500.Ishii, H., et al. Current status of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24374899
501.Laranjo Tinoco, C., et al. Surgical management of obstructing ureteral stones during pregnancy: A systematic review of different techniques. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2024. 96: 12153.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39356029
502.Teleb, M., et al. Definitive ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral calculi during pregnancy. Arab J Urol, 2014. 12: 299.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019966
503.Johnson, E.B., et al. Obstetric complications of ureteroscopy during pregnancy. J Urol, 2012. 188: 151.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591961
504.Graf, S., et al. Ureterorenoscopy for stone disease in pregnancy: a literature review and update. Curr Opin Urol, 2024. 34: 128.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727900
505.Ramachandra, M., et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) during pregnancy: A review of literature. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: 89.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32134719
506.Holmes, D.G., et al. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology, 2002. 60: 603.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12385916
507.Yang, W.J., et al. Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer. Urology, 2006. 68: 324.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16904445
508.Assimos, D.G. Nephrolithiasis in patients with urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 69.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7490901
509.Cohen, T.D., et al. Long-term incidence and risks for recurrent stones following contemporary management of upper tract calculi in patients with a urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 62.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7490899
510.El-Assmy, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology, 2005. 66: 510.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16140067
511.Deliveliotis, C., et al. Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. J Endourol, 2002. 16: 717.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12542873
512.el-Nahas, A.R., et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology, 2006. 68: 500.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16979745
513.Ramachandra, M.N., et al. Challenges of Retrograde Ureteroscopy in Patients with Urinary Diversion: Outcomes and Lessons Learnt from a Systematic Review of Literature. Urol Int, 2018. 101: 249.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614503
514.Stein, J.P., et al. Complications of the afferent antireflux valve mechanism in the Kock ileal reservoir. J Urol, 1996. 155: 1579.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8627827
515.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol, 2003. 170: 45.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12796641
516.Hensle, T.W., et al. Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU Int, 2004. 93: 585.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15008735
517.Raj, G.V., et al. The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol, 1999. 162: 1238.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10458475
518.Taskinen, S., et al. Additional surgery in patients with bladder augmentation. J Pediatr Urol, 2023. 19: 406 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061366
519.Zhang, W., et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Urinary Stones Among Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2024. 70: 79.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39507510
520.Gros, D.A., et al. Urolithiasis in spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 1998. 8 Suppl 1: 68.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9926338
521.Shepard, C.L., et al. Urinary tract stone development in patients with myelodysplasia subjected to augmentation cystoplasty. Rev Urol, 2017. 19: 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28522925
522.Christman, M.S., et al. Morbidity and efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1479.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23454151
523.Kim, J., et al. A systematic review of postoperative outcomes of kidney stone surgery and meta-analysis of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2023. 61: 469.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596394
524.Ganesan, C., et al. Kidney Stone Events after Kidney Transplant in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023. 18: 777.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071657
525.Harper, J.M., et al. Risk factors for calculus formation in patients with renal transplants. Br J Urol, 1994. 74: 147.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7921929
526.Challacombe, B., et al. Multimodal management of urolithiasis in renal transplantation. BJU Int, 2005. 96: 385.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16042735
527.Rifaioglu, M.M., et al. Percutaneous management of stones in transplanted kidneys. Urology, 2008. 72: 508.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18653217
528.Gupta, M., et al. Treatment of stones associated with complex or anomalous renal anatomy. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 431.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678992
529.Lu, H.F., et al. Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis: early percutaneous management. Urology, 2002. 59: 25.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11796274
530.Del Pizzo, J.J., et al. Ureteroscopic evaluation in renal transplant recipients. J Endourol, 1998. 12: 135.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9607439
531.Basiri, A., et al. Ureteroscopic management of urological complications after renal transplantation. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2006. 40: 53.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16452057
532.Minon Cifuentes, J., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in transplanted kidney. Urology, 1991. 38: 232.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1887537
533.Wyatt, J., et al. Treatment outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal allografts. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1821.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19814697
534.Boissier, R., et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Interventions on Nephrolithiasis in Transplanted Kidney. Eur Urol Focus, 2023. 9: 491.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567234
535.Yin, S., et al. Treatment of donors’ asymptomatic small kidney stones and post-transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2023. 51: 104.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584873
536.Reeves, T., et al. Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2019. 29: 548.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855381
537.Cerrato, C., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med, 2023. 12.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445423
538.Cerrato, C., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for De Novo Urolithiasis After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Endourol, 2024. 38: 536.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38545755
539.Garcia Rojo, E., et al. Real-world Global Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Anomalous Kidneys: A High Volume International Multicenter Study. Urology, 2022. 159: 41.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34715241
540.Parkhomenko, E., et al. Percutaneous Management of Stone Containing Calyceal Diverticula: Associated Factors and Outcomes. J Urol, 2017. 198: 864.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483573
541.Bas, O., et al. Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 155.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249328
542.Hu, C., et al. Percutaneous nephroscopy versus flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of calyceal diverticulum calculi: a meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2025. 25: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39748346
543.Gaur, D.D. Retroperitoneal endoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience in 12 patients. J Endourol, 1993. 7: 501.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8124346
544.Gaur, D.D., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol, 1994. 151: 927.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8126827
545.Lavan, L., et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1135.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101967
546.Chen, H., et al. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Urol Int, 2019. 103: 249.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096234
547.Yi, X., et al. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Urolithiasis in Horseshoe Kidney Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg, 2021. 8: 726233.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760915
548.Salvi, M., et al. Active treatment of renal stones in pelvic ectopic kidney: systematic review of literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 691.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298068
549.Skolarikos, A., et al. Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 5.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25362543
550.Ward, J.B., et al. Pediatric Urinary Stone Disease in the United States: The Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urology, 2019. 129: 180.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31005657
551.Alfandary, H., et al. Increasing Prevalence of Nephrolithiasis in Association with Increased Body Mass Index in Children: A Population Based Study. J Urol, 2018. 199: 1044.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061537
552.Hu, J., et al. Global, Regional, and National Epidemiology of Pediatric Urolithiasis (1990-2021) and 2040 Forecast. J Urol, 2025. 214: 435.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40532191
553.Novak, T.E., et al. Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology, 2009. 74: 104.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428065
554.Bevill, M., et al. The Modern Metabolic Stone Evaluation in Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 15.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27838366
555.Kovacevic, L., et al. From hypercalciuria to hypocitraturia--a shifting trend in pediatric urolithiasis? J Urol, 2012. 188: 1623.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22910255
556.Cambareri, G.M., et al. National multi-institutional cooperative on urolithiasis in children: Age is a significant predictor of urine abnormalities. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 218.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119451
557.Tasian, G.E., et al. Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones in children. J Urol, 2014. 192: 1329.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960469
558.Braun, D.A., et al. Prevalence of Monogenic Causes in Pediatric Patients with Nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016. 11: 664.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26787776
559.Kant, A.K., et al. Contributors of water intake in US children and adolescents: associations with dietary and meal characteristics--National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. Am J Clin Nutr, 2010. 92: 887.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20685949
560.Cogswell, M.E., et al. Vital signs: sodium intake among U.S. school-aged children - 2009-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2014. 63: 789.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25211544
561.Clark, M.A., et al. Nutritional quality of the diets of US public school children and the role of the school meal programs. J Am Diet Assoc, 2009. 109: S44.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166672
562.Andrioli, V., et al. Infant nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis: Natural history and predictors of surgical intervention. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 355 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729176
563.Sas, D.J., et al. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of children with nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467033
564.Telli, O., et al. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting? Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 853.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070668
565.Dos Santos, J., et al. Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children. J Urol, 2016. 195: 1289.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926554
566.Dincel, N., et al. Are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Pediatr Surg, 2013. 48: 840.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23583144
567.Barreto, L., et al. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018. 6: CD010784.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859007
568.Sun, F., et al. Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of alpha-Adrenergic Blockers for Pediatric Urolithiasis in the Distal Ureter. Front Pediatr, 2022. 10: 809914.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35498769
569.Lu, P., et al. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 199.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25721456
570.Dogan, H.S., et al. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 84 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812469
571.Alsagheer, G., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 515 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28457667
572.Zeng, G., et al. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 599.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22580634
573.Badawy, A.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol, 2012. 44: 661.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350835
574.Jee, J.Y., et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric and adolescent urolithiasis. Korean J Urol, 2013. 54: 865.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363869
575.Cevik, B., et al. Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 363.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28642966
576.Kumar, A., et al. A Single Center Experience Comparing Miniperc and Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Radiopaque 1-2 cm Lower Caliceal Renal Calculi in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 805.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25633506
577.Abdel-Kader, M.S., et al. Which is better, fluoroscopic-guided or ultrasonic-guided shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal stones? Prospective randomized comparative study. World J Urol, 2023. 41: 1175.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746808
578.Wang, H.H., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children’s hospitals. J Urol, 2012. 187: 1402.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22341283
579.Jurkiewicz, B., et al. Ureterolithotripsy in a paediatric population: a single institution’s experience. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 171.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368682
580.Elsheemy, M.S., et al. Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in children: predictive factors for complications and success. World J Urol, 2014. 32: 985.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23979150
581.Ishii, H., et al. Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: a systematic review. BJU Int, 2015. 115: 867.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25203925
582.Tanriverdi, O., et al. Comparison of ureteroscopic procedures with rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes in pediatric population: does the caliber of instrument matter? Pediatr Surg Int, 2010. 26: 733.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20521057
583.Dogan, H.S., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1035.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21784482
584.Gokce, M.I., et al. Effect of Prestenting on Success and Complication Rates of Ureterorenoscopy in Pediatric Population. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 850.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189236
585.Ellison, J.S., et al. Risk factors for repeat surgical intervention in pediatric nephrolithiasis: A Pediatric Health Information System database study. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 245 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580730
586.Unsal, A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Surg, 2011. 46: 2195.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075358
587.Erkurt, B., et al. Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24374900
588.Suliman, A., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy to treat upper urinary tract stones in children. Urolithiasis, 2020. 48: 57.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370467
589.Xiao, J., et al. Treatment of upper urinary tract stones with flexible ureteroscopy in children. Can Urol Assoc J, 2019. 13: E78.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30169147
590.Tiryaki, T., et al. Ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral stones in children: factors influencing the outcome. Urology, 2013. 81: 1047.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23465154
591.Lim, E.J., et al. Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 1223.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129624
592.Geraghty, R., et al. Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol, 2023. 210: 876.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37669621
593.Mokhless, I.A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol, 2014. 191: 1496.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679882
594.Abuelnaga, M., et al. Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children </=10 years of age. J Pediatr Urol, 2024. 20: 605 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38851968
595.Saad, K.S., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Large Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 1716.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26165587
596.Pelit, E.S., et al. Comparison of Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Preschool-aged Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 21.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818164
597.Bas, O., et al. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderately Sized Pediatric Kidney Stones. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 765.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26983791
598.Chen, Y., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 189.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368009
599.Cicekbilek, I., et al. Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: assessment by quantitative SPECT of (99m)Tc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys. Ren Fail, 2015. 37: 1118.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067745
600.Celik, H., et al. Comparison of the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy with different sized instruments. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 203.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27155829
601.Dombrovskiy, V., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: Analysis of Nationwide Hospitalizations and Short-Term Outcomes for the United States, 2001-2014. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 912.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30113212
602.Senocak, C., et al. Predictive factors of bleeding among pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 383.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28702679
603.Jones, P., et al. Role of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques-Micro and Ultra-Mini PCNL (<15F) in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 816.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28478724
604.Guven, S., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int, 2013. 111: 148.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22578216
605.Onal, B., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol, 2014. 191: 777.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24095906
606.Aghamir, S.M., et al. Comparing Bleeding Complications of Double and Single Access Totally Tubeless PCNL: Is It Safe to Obtain More Accesses? Urol Int, 2016. 96: 73.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26021886
607.Iqbal, N., et al. Comparison of outcomes of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study. Turk J Urol, 2018. 44: 56.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484229
608.Fang, H., et al. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of supine versus prone position for pediatric PCNL. Int Urol Nephrol, 2025. 57: 2345.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39971864
609.Porto, B.C., et al. Flank-free modified supine vs. prone position for pediatric nephrolithotripsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2024. 24: 262.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39614229
610.Tanidir, Y., et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety. J Pediatr Urol, 2024. 20: 606 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38871548
611.Samad, L., et al. Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children cause significant renal scarring? J Pediatr Urol, 2007. 3: 36.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18947696
612.Modi, P.K., et al. Pediatric hospitalizations for upper urinary tract calculi: Epidemiological and treatment trends in the United States, 2001-2014. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 13 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966022
613.Agrawal, V., et al. Laparoscopic management of pediatric renal and ureteric stones. J Pediatr Urol, 2013. 9: 230.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22498008
614.Srivastava, A., et al. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in Children: With and Without Stent - Initial Tertiary Care Center Experience with More Than 1-Year Follow-Up. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2017. 27: 150.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26878339
615.Lee, R.S., et al. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2306.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17509345
616.Esposito, C., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for treatment of urinary tract stones in children: report of a multicenter international experience. Urolithiasis, 2021. 49: 575.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33993337
617.Dai, J.C., et al. National Trends in CT Utilization and Estimated CT-related Radiation Exposure in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Stone Patients. Urology, 2019. 133: 50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404583
618.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures: IAEA-SEGUR study. J Radiol Prot, 2020. 40.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33086202
619.Yecies, T., et al. Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology. Can J Urol, 2018. 25: 9154.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524969
620.Jindal, T. The risk of radiation exposure to assisting staff in urological procedures: a literature review. Urol Nurs, 2013. 33: 136.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23930446
621.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation Exposure of Surgical Team During Endourological Procedures: International Atomic Energy Agency-South-Eastern European Group for Urolithiasis Research Study. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 574.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791856
622.Pierce, D.A., et al. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res, 2000. 154: 178.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10931690
623.Preston, D.L., et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res, 2007. 168: 1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17722996
624.Pearce, M.S., et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 2012. 380: 499.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22681860
625.Mathews, J.D., et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ, 2013. 346: f2360.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23694687
626.Berrington de Gonzalez, A., et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med, 2009. 169: 2071.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008689
627.Brenner, D.J., et al. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med, 2007. 357: 2277.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18046031
628.De Coninck, V., et al. Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures. World J Urol, 2024. 42: 266.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38676726
629.Wrixon, A.D. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot, 2008. 28: 161.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495983
630.Tzelves, L., et al. Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies. Asian J Urol, 2023. 10: 215.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538154
631.Nayan, M., et al. Variations between two 24-hour urine collections in patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic. Can Urol Assoc J, 2012. 6: 30.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22396364
632.Parks, J.H., et al. A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1607.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11912373
633.Cameron, M., et al. The diurnal variation in urine acidification differs between normal individuals and uric acid stone formers. Kidney Int, 2012. 81: 1123.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297671
634.Bobulescu, I.A., et al. Net Acid Excretion and Urinary Organic Anions in Idiopathic Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2019. 14: 411.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745301
635.Cameron, M.A., et al. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 335.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678984
636.Ferraz, R.R., et al. Preservation of urine samples for metabolic evaluation of stone-forming patients. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 329.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16896690
637.Capolongo, G., et al. Fasting versus 24-h urine pH in the evaluation of nephrolithiasis. Urol Res, 2011. 39: 367.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336574
638.Gambaro, G., et al. Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement. J Nephrol, 2016. 29: 715.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456839
639.Porowski, T., et al. Assessment of lithogenic risk in children based on a morning spot urine sample. J Urol, 2010. 184: 2103.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20850811
640.Tiselius, H.G. Metabolic evaluation and therapy. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 545.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11148723
641.D., A., Urine evaluation (in: Evaluation of the stone former), in 2ND International Consultation on Stone Disease, H.M. Assimos D. Chew B, Hautmann R, Holmes R, Williams J, Wolf JS, Editor. 2007, Health Publications.
642.Tiselius, H.G. Standardized estimate of the ion activity product of calcium oxalate in urine from renal stone formers. Eur Urol, 1989. 16: 48.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2714318
643.Ackermann, D., et al. Use of the computer program EQUIL to estimate pH in model solutions and human urine. Urol Res, 1989. 17: 157.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2749945
644.Kavanagh, J.P., et al. Why does the Bonn Risk Index discriminate between calcium oxalate stone formers and healthy controls? J Urol, 2006. 175: 766.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407047
645.Rodgers AL, A.-H.S., Jackson GE., JESS: What can it teach us?, in Proceedings of Renal Stone Disease 1st Annual International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, 2-3 November 2006., J.L.a.J.W. AP Evan, Jr, Editor. 2007, American Institute of Physics: Melville, New York
646.Sakhaee, K. Epidemiology and clinical pathophysiology of uric acid kidney stones. J Nephrol, 2014. 27: 241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497296
647.Matos, V., et al. Urinary phosphate/creatinine, calcium/creatinine, and magnesium/creatinine ratios in a healthy pediatric population. J Pediatr, 1997. 131: 252.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9290612
648.Sarica, K., et al. The effect of calcium channel blockers on stone regrowth and recurrence after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 184.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16463053
649.Fink, H.A., et al. Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline. Ann Intern Med, 2013. 158: 535.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23546565
650.Borghi, L., et al. Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol, 1996. 155: 839.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8583588
651.Bao, Y., et al. Water for preventing urinary stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012: CD004292.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22696340
652.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Effect of water composition and timing of ingestion on urinary lithogenic profile in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover trial. J Nephrol, 2021. 34: 875.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514990
653.Hakam, N., et al. Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Testing Changes in Daily Water Intake: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open, 2024. 7: e2447621.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39585691
654.Siener, R., et al. Dietary risk factors for hyperoxaluria in calcium oxalate stone formers. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1037.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12631085
655.Barghouthy, Y., et al. Role of Citrus Fruit Juices in Prevention of Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 2021. 13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836376
656.Wabner, C.L., et al. Effect of orange juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 1993. 149: 1405.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8501777
657.Gettman, M.T., et al. Effect of cranberry juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 2005. 174: 590.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16006907
658.Shuster, J., et al. Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: a randomized prevention trial. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992. 45: 911.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1624973
659.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Soda and other beverages and the risk of kidney stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1389.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23676355
660.Kocvara, R., et al. A prospective study of nonmedical prophylaxis after a first kidney stone. BJU Int, 1999. 84: 393.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10468751
661.Hess, B., et al. Effects of a ‘common sense diet’ on urinary composition and supersaturation in patients with idiopathic calcium urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 1999. 36: 136.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10420035
662.Barghouthy, Y., et al. The Relationship between Modern Fad Diets and Kidney Stone Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature. Nutrients, 2021. 13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959822
663.Ebisuno, S., et al. Results of long-term rice bran treatment on stone recurrence in hypercalciuric patients. Br J Urol, 1991. 67: 237.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1902388
664.Hiatt, R.A., et al. Randomized controlled trial of a low animal protein, high fiber diet in the prevention of recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones. Am J Epidemiol, 1996. 144: 25.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8659482
665.Dussol, B., et al. A randomized trial of low-animal-protein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephron Clin Pract, 2008. 110: c185.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957869
666.Turney, B.W., et al. Diet and risk of kidney stones in the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Eur J Epidemiol, 2014. 29: 363.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24752465
667.Asplin, J.R. The management of patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645872
668.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Vitamin C Intake and Risk of Incident Kidney Stones. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016. 67: 400.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26463139
669.Fink, H.A., et al. Diet, fluid, or supplements for secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol, 2009. 56: 72.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19321253
670.Borghi, L., et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346: 77.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11784873
671.Curhan, G.C., et al. Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med, 1997. 126: 497.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9092314
672.von Unruh, G.E., et al. Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004. 15: 1567.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15153567
673.Harris, S.S., et al. Effects of Hydration and Calcium Supplementation on Urine Calcium Concentration in Healthy Postmenopausal Women. J Am Coll Nutr, 2015. 34: 340.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25856469
674.B., E., Hyperuricosuric calcium stone disease, in Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, F.M. Coe FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM, Editor. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.
675.Coe, F.L. Hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1980. 128: 439.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7424690
676.Siener, R., et al. The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res, 2004. 12: 106.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14742848
677.Geraghty, R., et al. Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 2020. 10: e032094.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959605
678.Chang, C.W., et al. Metabolic Syndrome Increases the Risk of Kidney Stone Disease: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pers Med, 2021. 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34834506
679.Pearle, M.S., et al., Medical management of urolithiasis. 2nd International consultation on Stone Disease, ed. K.S. Denstedt J. 2008.
http://www.icud.info/publications.html
680.Barcelo, P., et al. Randomized double-blind study of potassium citrate in idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 150: 1761.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8230497
681.Hofbauer, J., et al. Alkali citrate prophylaxis in idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate urolithiasis--a prospective randomized study. Br J Urol, 1994. 73: 362.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8199822
682.Ettinger, B., et al. Potassium-magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1997. 158: 2069.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9366314
683.Lojanapiwat, B., et al. Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 611.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099273
684.Favus, M.J., et al. The effects of allopurinol treatment on stone formation on hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate stone-formers. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 1980. 53: 265.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6938003
685.Ettinger, B., et al. Randomized trial of allopurinol in the prevention of calcium oxalate calculi. N Engl J Med, 1986. 315: 1386.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3534570
686.Smith, M.J. Placebo versus allopurinol for renal calculi. J Urol, 1977. 117: 690.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/875139
687.Pearle, M.S., et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials for medical prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 679.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10608521
688.Gupta, M., et al. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Idiopathic Hyperoxaluria Treatments. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1844.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34254834
689.Ettinger, B., et al. Chlorthalidone reduces calcium oxalate calculous recurrence but magnesium hydroxide does not. J Urol, 1988. 139: 679.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3280829
690.Prien, E.L., Sr., et al. Magnesium oxide-pyridoxine therapy for recurrent calcium oxalate calculi. J Urol, 1974. 112: 509.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4414543
691.Pinheiro, V.B., et al. The effect of sodium bicarbonate upon urinary citrate excretion in calcium stone formers. Urology, 2013. 82: 33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23602798
692.Hoppe, B., et al. The primary hyperoxalurias. Kidney Int, 2009. 75: 1264.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19225556
693.Cohen, T.D., et al. Clinical effect of captopril on the formation and growth of cystine calculi. J Urol, 1995. 154: 164.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7776415
694.Coulthard, M.G., et al. The treatment of cystinuria with captopril. Am J Kidney Dis, 1995. 25: 661.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7702068
695.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of febuxostat versus allopurinol or placebo in individuals with higher urinary uric acid excretion and calcium stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1960.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929928
696.Nouvenne, A., et al. New pharmacologic approach to patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis and high uricosuria: Febuxostat vs allopurinol. A pilot study. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2013. 24: e64.
https://www.ejinme.com/article/S0953-6205(13)00364-6/fulltext
697.Jarrar, K., et al. Struvite stones: long term follow up under metaphylaxis. Ann Urol (Paris), 1996. 30: 112.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8766146
698.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens, 1998. 11: 46.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9504449
699.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998. 32: 802.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9820450
700.Borghi, L., et al. Randomized prospective study of a nonthiazide diuretic, indapamide, in preventing calcium stone recurrences. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 1993. 22 Suppl 6: S78.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7508066
701.Brocks, P., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium stones? Lancet, 1981. 2: 124.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6113485
702.Mortensen, J.T., et al. Thiazides in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent idiopathic kidney stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1986. 18: 265.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3533825
703.Laerum, E., et al. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis. A double-blind study in general practice. Acta Med Scand, 1984. 215: 383.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6375276
704.Ohkawa, M., et al. Thiazide treatment for calcium urolithiasis in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Br J Urol, 1992. 69: 571.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1638340
705.Scholz, D., et al. Double-blind study with thiazide in recurrent calcium lithiasis. J Urol, 1982. 128: 903.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7176047
706.Nicar, M.J., et al. Use of potassium citrate as potassium supplement during thiazide therapy of calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1984. 131: 430.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6699979
707.Fernandez-Rodriguez, A., et al. [The role of thiazides in the prophylaxis of recurrent calcium lithiasis]. Actas Urol Esp, 2006. 30: 305.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16749588
708.Dolin, D.J., et al. Effect of cystine-binding thiol drugs on urinary cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. J Endourol, 2005. 19: 429.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15865542
709.Chow, G.K., et al. Medical treatment of cystinuria: results of contemporary clinical practice. J Urol, 1996. 156: 1576.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8863541
710.Pak, C.Y., et al. Management of cystine nephrolithiasis with alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine. J Urol, 1986. 136: 1003.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3534301
711.Tekin, A., et al. Cystine calculi in children: the results of a metabolic evaluation and response to medical therapy. J Urol, 2001. 165: 2328.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11371943
712.Pedersen, S.A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer: A nationwide case-control study from Denmark. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018. 78: 673.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29217346
713.Pottegard, A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use is strongly associated with risk of lip cancer. J Intern Med, 2017. 282: 322.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480532
714.Pottegard, A., et al. Association of Hydrochlorothiazide Use and Risk of Malignant Melanoma. JAMA Intern Med, 2018. 178: 1120.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29813157
715.Worcester, E.M., et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of idiopathic hypercalciuria. Semin Nephrol, 2008. 28: 120.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18359393
716.Taheri, M., et al. Effect of magnesium oxide or citrate supplements on metabolic risk factors in kidney stone formers with idiopathic hyperoxaluria: a randomized clinical trial. Magnes Res, 2024. 37: 12.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39077820
717.Curhan, G.C., et al. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med, 1993. 328: 833.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8441427
718.Wolf, H., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium oxalate stones? Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, 1983. 20: 477.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6361755
719.Johansson, G., et al. Effects of magnesium hydroxide in renal stone disease. J Am Coll Nutr, 1982. 1: 179.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6764473
720.Khan, S.R., et al. Magnesium oxide administration and prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 149: 412.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8426432
721.Solak, V., et al. Potassium citrate vs. hydrochlorothiazide to reduce urinary calcium excretion in calcium oxalate stone patients with hypercalciuria: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2021. 53: 1791.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33904027
722.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Furosemide/Fludrocortisone Test and Clinical Parameters to Diagnose Incomplete Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis in Kidney Stone Formers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017. 12: 1507.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775126
723.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Efficacy of standard and low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the recurrence prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis (NOSTONE trial): protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BMC Nephrol, 2018. 19: 349.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526528
724.Hesse, A., et al. Causes of phosphate stone formation and the importance of metaphylaxis by urinary acidification: a review. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 308.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10552150
725.Silverberg, S.J., et al. A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med, 1999. 341: 1249.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10528034
726.Mollerup, C.L., et al. Risk of renal stone events in primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroid surgery: controlled retrospective follow up study. BMJ, 2002. 325: 807.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12376441
727.Evan, A.E., et al. Histopathology and surgical anatomy of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and calcium phosphate stones. Kidney Int, 2008. 74: 223.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449170
728.Verheyen, N., et al. Cinacalcet hydrochloride for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2013. 14: 793.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452174
729.Bilezikian, J.P., et al. Guidelines for the management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: summary statement from the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014. 99: 3561.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162665
730.Wilhelm, S.M., et al. The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for Definitive Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism. JAMA Surg, 2016. 151: 959.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532368
731.Wang, X., et al. Systematic review of the risk of urolithiasis following parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Int Urol Nephrol, 2024. 56: 1217.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38038823
732.Rizzato, G., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a presenting feature of chronic sarcoidosis: a prospective study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 1996. 13: 167.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8893387
733.Garrelfs, S.F., et al. Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1. N Engl J Med, 2021. 384: 1216.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789010
734.Frishberg, Y., et al. Efficacy and safety of lumasiran for infants and young children with primary hyperoxaluria type 1: 30-month analysis of the phase 3 ILLUMINATE-B trial. Front Pediatr, 2024. 12: 1392644.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39355649
735.Saland, J.M., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Lumasiran in Patients With Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: Results from a Phase III Clinical Trial. Kidney Int Rep, 2024. 9: 2037.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39081738
736.Takei, K., et al. Oral calcium supplement decreases urinary oxalate excretion in patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urol Int, 1998. 61: 192.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9933846
737.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with secondary hyperoxaluria. Front Biosci, 2003. 8: e437.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12957811
738.Prezioso, D., et al. Dietary treatment of urinary risk factors for renal stone formation. A review of CLU Working Group. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2015. 87: 105.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150027
739.Domrongkitchaiporn, S., et al. Dosage of potassium citrate in the correction of urinary abnormalities in pediatric distal renal tubular acidosis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002. 39: 383.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11840381
740.AP., M. Genetic renal abnormalities. Medicine, 2007. 35: 386.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1357303907001090
741.Sromicki, J., et al. Prospective long-term evaluation of incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis diagnosed by low-dose NH(4)CL loading - gender prevalences and impact of alkali treatment. J Nephrol, 2022. 35: 1619.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973150
742.Oliveira, B., et al. Genetic, pathophysiological, and clinical aspects of nephrocalcinosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2016. 311: F1243.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605580
743.Mandel, N.S., et al. Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J Urol, 1989. 142: 1516.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2585627
744.Trinchieri, A., et al. Prevalence of renal uric acid stones in the adult. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 553.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258472
745.Kim, S., et al. Development of Nephrolithiasis in Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis, 2017. 70: 173.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410765
746.Millman, S., et al. Pathogenesis and clinical course of mixed calcium oxalate and uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int, 1982. 22: 366.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7176335
747.Pak, C.Y., et al. Biochemical distinction between hyperuricosuric calcium urolithiasis and gouty diathesis. Urology, 2002. 60: 789.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12429297
748.Chou, Y.H., et al. Clinical study of ammonium acid urate urolithiasis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012. 28: 259.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531304
749.Wagner, C.A., et al. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol, 2010. 23 Suppl 16: S165.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170875
750.Marchini, G.S., et al. Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1334.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23022002
751.Kramer, G., et al. Role of bacteria in the development of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 35.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10650513
752.Gettman, M.T., et al. Struvite stones: diagnosis and current treatment concepts. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 653.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10608517
753.Wall, I., et al. Biochemical risk factors in patients with renal staghorn stone disease. Urology, 1986. 28: 377.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3787896
754.Akagashi, K., et al. Characteristics of patients with staghorn calculi in our experience. Int J Urol, 2004. 11: 276.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15147542
755.Amaro, C.R., et al. Metabolic investigation of patients with staghorn calculus: is it necessary? Int Braz J Urol, 2009. 35: 658.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20028571
756.Resnick, M.I., et al. Bilateral staghorn calculi--patient evaluation and management. J Urol, 1980. 123: 338.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7359631
757.Kristensen, C., et al. Reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypercalciuria in primary struvite nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int, 1987. 32: 749.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3430961
758.Iqbal, M.W., et al. Should metabolic evaluation be performed in patients with struvite stones? Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 185.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27240693
759.Bichler, K.H., et al. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2002. 19: 488.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12135839
760.Carpentier, X., et al. Relationships between carbonation rate of carbapatite and morphologic characteristics of calcium phosphate stones and etiology. Urology, 2009. 73: 968.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19394492
761.Thompson, R.B., et al. Bacteriology of infected stones. Urology, 1973. 2: 627.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4587909
762.McLean, R.J., et al. The ecology and pathogenicity of urease-producing bacteria in the urinary tract. Crit Rev Microbiol, 1988. 16: 37.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3053050
763.Wong HY, R.C., Griffith DP., Medical management and prevention of struvite stones, in Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, Coe, et al., Editors. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.
764.Wall, I., et al. Long-term acidification of urine in patients treated for infected renal stones. Urol Int, 1990. 45: 336.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2288050
765.Griffith, D.P., et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of Lithostat (acetohydroxamic acid) in the palliative treatment of infection-induced urinary calculi. Eur Urol, 1991. 20: 243.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726639
766.Williams, J.J., et al. A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 1984. 311: 760.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6472365
767.Leusmann, D.B., et al. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1990. 24: 205.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2237297
768.Milliner, D.S., et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc, 1993. 68: 241.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8474265
769.Prot-Bertoye, C., et al. CKD and Its Risk Factors among Patients with Cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015. 10: 842.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717071
770.Kum, F., et al. Hypertension and renal impairment in patients with cystinuria: findings from a specialist cystinuria centre. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 357.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805669
771.Ferraro, P.M., et al. When to suspect a genetic disorder in a patient with renal stones, and why. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013. 28: 811.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23291371
772.Rogers, A., et al. Management of cystinuria. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 347.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678985
773.Dello Strologo, L., et al. Comparison between SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 cystinuria patients and carriers: a need for a new classification. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002. 13: 2547.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12239244
774.Lee, W.S., et al. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human kidney cDNA involved in cystine, dibasic, and neutral amino acid transport. J Clin Invest, 1993. 91: 1959.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8486766
775.Daudon, M., et al. Cystine crystal volume determination: a useful tool in the management of cystinuric patients. Urol Res, 2003. 31: 207.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12748836
776.Malieckal, D.A., et al. Effect of increasing doses of cystine-binding thiol drugs on cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 549.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30980122
777.Nakagawa, Y., et al. Clinical use of cystine supersaturation measurements. J Urol, 2000. 164: 1481.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11025687
778.Fjellstedt, E., et al. Cystine analyses of separate day and night urine as a basis for the management of patients with homozygous cystinuria. Urol Res, 2001. 29: 303.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11762791
779.Norman, R.W., et al. Dietary restriction of sodium as a means of reducing urinary cystine. J Urol, 1990. 143: 1193.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2342181
780.Ng, C.S., et al. Contemporary management of cystinuria. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 647.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10608516
781.Knoll, T., et al. Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol, 2005. 20: 19.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15602663
782.Biyani, C.S., et al. Cystinuria—Diagnosis and Management. EAU-EBU Update Series, 2006. 4: 175.
783.Servais, A., et al. Cystinuria: clinical practice recommendation. Kidney Int, 2021. 99: 48.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32918941
784.Prot-Bertoye, C., et al. Adverse events associated with currently used medical treatments for cystinuria and treatment goals: results from a series of 442 patients in France. BJU Int, 2019. 124: 849.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801923
785.Runolfsdottir, H.L., et al. Urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, carriers and healthy control subjects. Mol Genet Metab, 2019. 128: 144.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31378568
786.Edvardsson, V.O., et al. Comparison of the effect of allopurinol and febuxostat on urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency (APRTd): A clinical trial. Eur J Intern Med, 2018. 48: 75.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29241594
787.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Drug-induced urinary calculi. Rev Urol, 2003. 5: 227.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16985842
788.Beltrami, P., et al. The endourological treatment of renal matrix stones. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 394.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24969358
789.Finocchiaro, R., et al. Usefulness of cyanide-nitroprusside test in detecting incomplete recessive heterozygotes for cystinuria: a standardized dilution procedure. Urol Res, 1998. 26: 401.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9879820
790.Nakagawa, Y., et al. A modified cyanide-nitroprusside method for quantifying urinary cystine concentration that corrects for creatinine interference. Clin Chim Acta, 1999. 289: 57.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10556653
791.Li, S., et al. Effect of stone composition on surgical stone recurrence: single center longitudinal analysis. Can J Urol, 2021. 28: 10744.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34378509
792.Schwartz, B.F., et al. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 333.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10778475
793.Kum, F., et al. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999-2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int, 2016. 118: 140.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26765522
794.Ramello, A., et al. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol, 2000. 13 Suppl 3: S45.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11132032
795.Halstead, S.B. Epidemiology of bladder stone of children: precipitating events. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 101.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559057
796.Takasaki, E., et al. Chemical compositions of 300 lower urinary tract calculi and associated disorders in the urinary tract. Urol Int, 1995. 54: 89.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7538235
797.Naqvi, S.A., et al. Bladder stone disease in children: clinical studies. J Pak Med Assoc, 1984. 34: 94.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6429380
798.Philippou, P., et al. The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology. Urology, 2012. 79: 980.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22119259
799.Lal, B., et al. Childhood Bladder Stones-an Endemic Disease of Developing Countries. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2015. 27: 17.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26182729
800.Douenias, R., et al. Predisposing factors in bladder calculi. Review of 100 cases. Urology, 1991. 37: 240.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2000681
801.Smith, J.M., et al. Vesical stone: The clinical features of 652 cases. Ir Med J, 1975. 68: 85.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1112692
802.Millan-Rodriguez, F., et al. Urodynamic findings before and after noninvasive management of bladder calculi. BJU Int, 2004. 93: 1267.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15180620
803.Yang, X., et al. The value of respective urodynamic parameters for evaluating the occurrence of complications linked to benign prostatic enlargement. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 1761.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811567
804.Childs, M.A., et al. Pathogenesis of bladder calculi in the presence of urinary stasis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1347.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23159588
805.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1105.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20092844
806.Mebust, W.K., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. 1989. J Urol, 2002. 167: 999.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11908420
807.Adegeest, C.Y., et al. Influence of severity and level of injury on the occurrence of complications during the subacute and chronic stage of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine, 2022. 36: 632.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767527
808.Kohler-Ockmore, J., et al. Long-term catheterization of the bladder: prevalence and morbidity. Br J Urol, 1996. 77: 347.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8814836
809.Kim, J.W., et al. Intravesical prostatic protrusion is a risk factor for bladder stone in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 2014. 84: 1026.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214201
810.Huang, W., et al. Risk factors for bladder calculi in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017. 96: e7728.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28796057
811.Bansal, A., et al. Prospective randomized comparison of three endoscopic modalities used in treatment of bladder stones. Urologia, 2016. 83: 87.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103095
812.Kawahara, T., et al. Correlation between the operation time using two different power settings of a Ho: YAG laser: laser power doesn’t influence lithotripsy time. BMC Res Notes, 2013. 6: 80.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510531
813.Liu, G., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy: An effective treatment for bladder stones with urethral strictures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2016. 9: 19907.
814.Soliman, N.A., et al. Endemic bladder calculi in children. Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 1489.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27848095
815.Aurora, A.L., et al. Bladder stone disease of childhood. II. A clinico-pathological study. Acta Paediatr Scand, 1970. 59: 385.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5447682
816.Valyasevi, A., et al. Studies of bladder stone disease in Thailand. VI. Urinary studies in children, 2-10 years old, resident in a hypo- and hyperendemic area. Am J Clin Nutr, 1967. 20: 1362.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6074673
817.Al-Marhoon, M.S., et al. Comparison of endourological and open cystolithotomy in the management of bladder stones in children. J Urol, 2009. 181: 2684.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19375100
818.Linsenmeyer, M.A., et al. Accuracy of bladder stone detection using abdominal x-ray after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2004. 27: 438.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15648797
819.Salinawati, B., et al. Accuracy of ultrasound versus computed tomography urogram in detecting urinary tract calculi. Med J Malaysia, 2015. 70: 238.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358021
820.Ahmed, F.O., et al. A comparison between transabdominal ultrasonographic and cystourethroscopy findings in adult Sudanese patients presenting with haematuria. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015. 47: 223.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25374263
821.Gontero, P., et al., EAU Guidelines on Non-musle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and CIS), in European Association of Urology Guidelines 2026 edition. 2026, The European Association of Urology: Arnhem, The Netherlands.
https://uroweb.org/guidelines/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer
822.Johnson, E.K., et al. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Urology, 2011. 78: 662.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21722946
823.Protection, I.C.o.R. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007. 37: 2.
http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103
824.O’Connor, R.C., et al. Nonsurgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with bladder calculi. Urology, 2002. 60: 288.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12137828
825.Rodman, J.S., et al. Dissolution of uric acid calculi. J Urol, 1984. 131: 1039.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6726897
826.Lopez, J.R., et al. Irrigating solutions in bladder stone dissolution. Drug Intell Clin Pharm, 1987. 21: 872.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3678056
827.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel. Eur Urol, 2019. 76: 352.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31311676
828.Rattan, K.N., et al. Catheterless and drainless open suprapubic cystolithotomy in children: a safe procedure. Pediatr Surg Int, 2006. 22: 255.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16416282
829.Ullah, S., et al. Comparison of open vesicolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2007. 23: 47.
830.Gou, L., et al. Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg, 2021. 21: 448.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34972510
831.Wu, J.H., et al. Combined usage of Ho:YAG laser with monopolar resectoscope in the treatment of bladder stone and bladder outlet obstruction. Pak J Med Sci, 2014. 30: 908.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097543
832.Halis, F., et al. The comparison of percutaneous and transurethral cystolithotripsy methods simultaneously performed with Transurethral Resection of Prostate in patients with BPH and bladder stone. KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019. 51: 189.
833.Razvi, H.A., et al. Management of vesical calculi: comparison of lithotripsy devices. J Endourol, 1996. 10: 559.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8972793
834.Ercil, H., et al. Comparison of Ho:Yag laser and pneumatic lithotripsy combined with transurethral prostatectomy in high burden bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg, 2016. 39: 238.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937584
835.Lv, J., et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of holmium laser treatment of bladder stones. Transl Androl Urol, 2021. 10: 3465.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532271
836.Akram, M., et al. Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for treatment of bladder calculi: evidence from a systematic literature review. Curr Opin Urol, 2025. 35: 331.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39774916
837.Javanmard, B., et al. Surgical Management of Vesical Stones in Children: A Comparison Between Open Cystolithotomy, Percutaneous Cystolithotomy and Transurethral Cystolithotripsy With Holmium-YAG Laser. J Lasers Med Sci, 2018. 9: 183.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809329
838.Gangkak, G., et al. Pneumatic cystolithotripsy versus holmium:yag laser cystolithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones: a prospective randomized study. Pediatr Surg Int, 2016. 32: 609.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879752
839.Abd, Z.H., et al. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children. J Clin Med, 2022. 11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159965
840.Fauzan, R., et al. Endourological versus open cystolithotomy for bladder stone management among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res, 2023. 12: 124.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39291145
841.Davis, N.F., et al. Treatment outcomes of bladder stones in children with intact bladders in developing countries: A systematic review of >1000 cases on behalf of the European Association of Urology Bladder Stones Guideline panel. J Pediatr Urol, 2022. 18: 132.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35148953
842.Shahat, A.A., et al. A randomised trial comparing transurethral to percutaneous cystolithotripsy in boys. BJU Int, 2022. 130: 254.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044035
843.Ali, M., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic cystolitholapaxy in the management of patients presenting with calcular acute urinary retention: a randomised controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 879.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105456
844.Deswanto, I.A., et al. Management of bladder stones: the move towards non-invasive treatment. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 2017. 26: 128.
http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/download/1602/1180
845.Bhatia, V., et al. A comparative study of cystolithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1994. 26: 26.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8026920
846.Rizvi, S.A., et al. Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: experience with 1,440 children. J Urol, 2003. 169: 634.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12544331
847.Autorino, R., et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol, 2015. 68: 86.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484140
848.Matei, D.V., et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int, 2012. 110: E972.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607242
849.Philippou, P., et al. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology, 2011. 78: 43.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21296391
850.Hasan, A.M., et al. Synchronous transurethral cystolitholapaxy and TURP reveals better results than transurethral cystolitholapaxy plus medical therapy for BPH: a randomized prospective study on 100 patients with concomitant urinary bladder stone(s) and BPH. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 483.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34807286
851.Guo, R.Q., et al. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 144.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28254117
852.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in a High-Volume Center: The Impact of Concomitant Holmium Laser Cystolitholapaxy. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 564.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30773913
853.Tangpaitoon, T., et al. Does Cystolitholapaxy at the Time of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Affect Outcomes? Urology, 2017. 99: 192.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637344
854.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Critical analysis of a multicentric experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes and complications of 10 years of routine clinical practice. BJU Int, 2020. 126: 177.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020749
855.Chen, Y., et al. Bladder stone incidence in persons with spinal cord injury: determinants and trends, 1973-1996. Urology, 2001. 58: 665.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11711333
856.Hall, M.K., et al. Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage. Urology, 1989. 34: 126.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2789449
857.DeVivo, M.J., et al. The risk of bladder calculi in patients with spinal cord injuries. Arch Intern Med, 1985. 145: 428.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3977510
858.Ord, J., et al. Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol, 2003. 170: 1734.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14532765
859.Bartel, P., et al. Bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term study. Spinal Cord, 2014. 52: 295.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24469146
860.Chen, H., et al. AB208. Can bladder irrigation reduce the morbidity of bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury? Translational Andrology and Urology, 2016. 5: AB208.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842518/
861.Awad, S.A., et al. Long-term results and complications of augmentation ileocystoplasty for idiopathic urge incontinence in women. Br J Urol, 1998. 81: 569.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9598629
862.Blyth, B., et al. Lithogenic properties of enterocystoplasty. J Urol, 1992. 148: 575.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1640525
863.Flood, H.D., et al. Long-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urology. Neurourol Urodyn, 1995. 14: 297.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7581466
864.Hayashi, Y., et al. Review of 86 patients with myelodysplasia and neurogenic bladder who underwent sigmoidocolocystoplasty and were followed more than 10 years. J Urol, 2006. 176: 1806.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945655
865.Husmann, D.A. Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol, 2016. 5: 3.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904407
866.Nurse, D.E., et al. Stones in enterocystoplasties. Br J Urol, 1996. 77: 684.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8689111
867.Shekarriz, B., et al. Surgical complications of bladder augmentation: comparison between various enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology, 2000. 55: 123.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10654908
868.Welk, B., et al. Population based assessment of enterocystoplasty complications in adults. J Urol, 2012. 188: 464.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22704106
869.Zhang, H., et al. Bladder stone formation after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: statistical analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr Surg, 2005. 40: 407.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15750938
870.Szymanski, K.M., et al. Additional Surgeries after Bladder Augmentation in Patients with Spina Bifida in the 21st Century. J Urol, 2020. 203: 1207.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31951496
871.DeFoor, W., et al. Bladder calculi after augmentation cystoplasty: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Urol, 2004. 172: 1964.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15540766
872.Hanna, M.K., et al. Challenges in salvaging urinary continence following failed bladder exstrophy repair in a developing country. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 270 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262536
873.Inouye, B.M., et al. Urologic complications of major genitourinary reconstruction in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 680.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082713
874.Lima, S.V., et al. Nonsecretory intestinocystoplasty: a 15-year prospective study of 183 patients. J Urol, 2008. 179: 1113.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18206934
875.Metcalfe, P.D., et al. What is the need for additional bladder surgery after bladder augmentation in childhood? J Urol, 2006. 176: 1801.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945653
876.Novak, T.E., et al. Complications of complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic versus nonneurogenic bladder--is there a difference? J Urol, 2008. 180: 2629.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18951557
877.Surer, I., et al. Continent urinary diversion and the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol, 2003. 169: 1102.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12576862
878.Palmer, L.S., et al. Urolithiasis in children following augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol, 1993. 150: 726.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8326634
879.Kronner, K.M., et al. Bladder calculi in the pediatric augmented bladder. J Urol, 1998. 160: 1096.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9719284
880.Silver, R.I., et al. Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol, 1997. 158: 1322.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9258206
881.Ross, J.P.J., et al. Pediatric bladder augmentation - Panacea or Pandora’s box? Can Urol Assoc J, 2020. 14: E251.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31977304
882.Kaefer, M., et al. Reservoir calculi: a comparison of reservoirs constructed from stomach and other enteric segments. J Urol, 1998. 160: 2187.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9817364
883.Wang, K., et al. Complications after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: review of 100 cases at one institution. J Pediatr Surg, 1999. 34: 1672.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10591568
884.Wagstaff, K.E., et al. Blood and urine analysis in patients with intestinal bladders. Br J Urol, 1991. 68: 311.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1913074
885.Raharja, P.A.R., et al. Long-term outcomes and complications of augmentation cystoplasty in pediatric neurogenic bladder patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Continence, 2025. 16: 102280.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973725005399
886.Breda, A., et al. Percutaneous cystolithotomy for calculi in reconstructed bladders: initial UCLA experience. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1989.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20303534
887.Kisku, S., et al. Bladder calculi in the augmented bladder: a follow-up study of 160 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 66 e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25819600
888.Szymanski, K.M., et al. Cutting for stone in augmented bladders-what is the risk of recurrence and is it impacted by treatment modality? J Urol, 2014. 191: 1375.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316089
889.Schlomer, B.J., et al. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 1043.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24766857
890.Turk, T.M., et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduit or continent urinary diversion. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 305.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10552149
891.Knap, M.M., et al. Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2004. 38: 153.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15204405
892.Arai, Y., et al. Orthotopic ileal neobladder in male patients: functional outcomes of 66 cases. Int J Urol, 1999. 6: 388.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10466450
893.Badawy, A.A., et al. Orthotopic diversion after cystectomy in women: A single-centre experience with a 10-year follow-up. Arab J Urol, 2011. 9: 267.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579310
894.Ji, H., et al. Identification and management of emptying failure in male patients with orthotopic neobladders after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology, 2010. 76: 644.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573379
895.Madbouly, K. Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery. Urol Ann, 2010. 2: 96.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981195
896.Miyake, H., et al. Experience with various types of orthotopic neobladder in Japanese men: long-term follow-up. Urol Int, 2010. 84: 34.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20173366
897.Moeen, A.M., et al. Management of neobladder complications: endoscopy comes first. Scand J Urol, 2017. 51: 146.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635567
898.Simon, J., et al. Neobladder emptying failure in males: incidence, etiology and therapeutic options. J Urol, 2006. 176: 1468.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16952662
899.Miyake, H., et al. Orthotopic sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: assessment of complications, functional outcomes and quality of life in 82 Japanese patients. BJU Int, 2010. 106: 412.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888974
900.Stein, J.P., et al. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 patients. J Urol, 2004. 172: 584.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15247737
901.Khalil, F., et al. Long-term follow-up after ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz I pouch): A retrospective study of a monocentric experience. Arab J Urol, 2015. 13: 245.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609442
902.Marien, T., et al. Characterization of Urolithiasis in Patients Following Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction with Intestinal Segments. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 217.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27936931
903.Davis, W.B., et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided access for the treatment of calculi in continent urinary reservoirs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2002. 25: 119.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11901429
904.Paez, E., et al. Percutaneous treatment of calculi in reconstructed bladder. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 334.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17444782
905.La Vecchia, C., et al. Genital and urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer. Cancer Res, 1991. 51: 629.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1985779
906.Chung, S.D., et al. A case-control study on the association between bladder cancer and prior bladder calculus. BMC Cancer, 2013. 13: 117.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497224
907.Jhamb, M., et al. Urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control, 2007. 18: 839.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17593531
908.Vaughan L.E., et al. Predictors of Symptomatic Kidney Stone Recurrence After the First and Subsequent Episodes. Mayo Clin Proc, 2019. 94: 202.
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30527866/
909.Shee K., et al. A Novel Machine-Learning Algorithm to Predict Stone Recurrence with 24-Hour Urine Data. J Endourol, 2024. 38: 809.
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39121452/
910.Guo J., et al. Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for urinary calculi recurrence. Urolithiasis, 2025. 19: 120.
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40536670/
911.Yasar, H., et al. Evaluation of the Risk of Urinary System Stone Recurrence Using Anthropometric Measurements and Lifestyle Behaviors in a Developed Artificial Intelligence Model. Diagnostics, 2025. 15: 2643.
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41153315/