1.Skolarikos, A., et al. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 750.

2.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 468.

3.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 475.

4.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel. Eur Urol, 2019. 76: 352.

5.Guyatt, G.H., et al. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008. 336: 995.

6.Guyatt, G.H., et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008. 336: 924.

7.Phillips, B., et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Updated by Jeremy Howick (March 2009). 2009.

8.Guyatt, G.H., et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008. 336: 1049.

9.Trinchieri A. et al. Epidemiology, In: Stone Disease, K.S. C.P. Segura JW, Pak CY, Preminger GM, Tolley D., Editor. 2003, Health Publications: Paris.

10.Stamatelou, K.K., et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1817.

11.Hesse, A., et al. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol, 2003. 44: 709.

12.Sanchez-Martin, F.M., et al. [Incidence and prevalence of published studies about urolithiasis in Spain. A review]. Actas Urol Esp, 2007. 31: 511.

13.Zhe, M., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a risk factor of chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies with 4,770,691 participants. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 441.

14.Wang, L., et al. Association Study of Reported Significant Loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, 13q14.1 and 16p12.3 with Urolithiasis in Chinese Han Ethnicity. Sci Rep, 2017. 7: 45766.

15.Leusmann, D.B. Whewellite, weddellite and company: where do all the strange names originate? BJU Int, 2000. 86: 411.

16.Strohmaier, W.L. Course of calcium stone disease without treatment. What can we expect? Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 339.

17.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Risk of recurrence of idiopathic calcium kidney stones: analysis of data from the literature. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 227.

18.Keoghane, S., et al. The natural history of untreated renal tract calculi. BJU Int, 2010. 105: 1627.

19.Straub, M., et al. Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol, 2005. 23: 309.

20.Pawar, A.S., et al. Incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients with horseshoe kidney: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann, 2018. 10: 87.

21.Dissayabutra, T., et al. Urinary stone risk factors in the descendants of patients with kidney stone disease. Pediatr Nephrol, 2018. 33: 1173.

22.Hu, H., et al. Association between Circulating Vitamin D Level and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 2017. 9.

23.Geraghty, R.M., et al. Worldwide Impact of Warmer Seasons on the Incidence of Renal Colic and Kidney Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review of Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 729.

24.Guo, Z.L., et al. Association between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018. 97: e9460.

25.Hesse, A.T., et al. (Eds.), Urinary Stones, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence. 3rd edition. 2009, Basel.

26.Basiri, A., et al. Familial relations and recurrence pattern in nephrolithiasis: new words about old subjects. Urol J, 2010. 7: 81.

27.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int, 2005. 67: 1053.

28.Asplin, J.R., et al. Hyperoxaluria in kidney stone formers treated with modern bariatric surgery.
J Urol, 2007. 177: 565.

29.Gonzalez, R.D., et al. Kidney stone risk following modern bariatric surgery. Curr Urol Rep, 2014.
15: 401.

30.Rendina, D., et al. Metabolic syndrome and nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence. J Nephrol, 2014. 27: 371.

31.Dell’Orto, V.G., et al. Metabolic disturbances and renal stone promotion on treatment with topiramate: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2014. 77: 958.

32.Mufti, U.B., et al. Nephrolithiasis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1557.

33.Chen, Y., et al. Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Spinal Cord, 2000. 38: 346.

34.Hara, A., et al. Incidence of nephrolithiasis in relation to environmental exposure to lead and cadmium in a population study. Environ Res, 2016. 145: 1.

35.Gambaro, G., et al. The Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Urolithiasis and its Urological Treatments: A Review. J Urol, 2017. 198: 268.

36.Leusmann, D.B., et al. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1990. 24: 205.

37.Kim, S.C., et al. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2007. 35: 319.

38.Wimpissinger, F., et al. The silence of the stones: asymptomatic ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2007.
178: 1341.

39.Ray, A.A., et al. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology, 2010. 76: 295.

40.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371: 1100.

41.Heidenreich, A., et al. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol, 2002. 41: 351.

42.Kennish, S.J., et al. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clin Radiol, 2008. 63: 1131.

43.Worster, A., et al. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med, 2002. 40: 280.

44.Wu, D.S., et al. Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 557.

45.El-Nahas, A.R., et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1688.

46.Patel, T., et al. Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1383.

47.Zarse, C.A., et al. CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res, 2007. 35: 201.

48.Kluner, C., et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006. 30: 44.

49.Caoili, E.M., et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology, 2002. 222: 353.

50.Van Der Molen, A.J., et al. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol, 2008. 18: 4.

51.Thomson, J.M., et al. Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose. Australas Radiol, 2001. 45: 291.

52.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Computed Tomography Radiation Dose in Patients With Suspected Urolithiasis. JAMA Intern Med, 2015. 175: 1413.

53.Rodger, F., et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2018. 100: 375.

54.Xiang, H., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2017. 61: 582.

55.Saikiran, P. Effectiveness of Low Dose Over Standard dose CT for Detection of Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Indian J Forens Med & Toxicol, 2020. 14: 4447.

56.Moore, C.L., et al. Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. J Urol, 2019. 202: 475.

57.Poletti, P.A., et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 927.

58.Zheng, X., et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for characterizing urinary calcified calculi and uric acid calculi: A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol, 2016. 85: 1843.

59.McGrath, T.A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2020. 30: 2791.

60.Mandel, N., et al. Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J Urol, 2003. 169: 2026.

61.Kourambas, J., et al. Role of stone analysis in metabolic evaluation and medical treatment of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 181.

62.Hesse, A., et al. Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001). Clin Chem Lab Med, 2005. 43: 298.

63.Sutor, D.J., et al. Identification standards for human urinary calculus components, using crystallographic methods. Br J Urol, 1968. 40: 22.

64.Abdel-Halim, R.E., et al. A review of urinary stone analysis techniques. Saudi Med J, 2006. 27: 1462.

65.Gilad, R., et al. Interpreting the results of chemical stone analysis in the era of modern stone analysis techniques. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 135.

66.Thiruchelvam, N., et al. Planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy using multidetector computed tomography urography, multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reformatting. BJU Int, 2005. 95: 1280.

67.Bonkat, G., et al., EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 37th EAU Annual Meeting, Amsterdam, E.A.o.U.G. Office, Editor. 2022, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

68.Somani, B.K., et al. Review on diagnosis and management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: an ESUT practical guide for urologists. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 1637.

69.Asrat, T., et al. Ultrasonographic detection of ureteral jets in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998. 178: 1194.

70.Swartz, M.A., et al. Admission for nephrolithiasis in pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 109: 1099.

71.Patel, S.J., et al. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics, 2007. 27: 1705.

72.Roy, C., et al. Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography. Eur Radiol, 1996. 6: 334.

73.Juan, Y.S., et al. Management of symptomatic urolithiasis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2007. 23: 241.

74.Masselli, G., et al. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging, 2014. 5: 691.

75.MHRA, Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment in Clinical Use, MHRA, Editor. 2015, MHRA.

76.ACOG Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 130: e210.

77.AIUM Practice parameter for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations 2013,

78.F.D.A. Avoid Fetal “Keepsake” Images, Heartbeat Monitors. 2014. 2018.

79.Sharp, C., et al., Diagnostic Medical Exposures: Advice on Exposure to Ionising Radiation during Pregnancy. 1998, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0RQ.

80.Kanal, E., et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 1447.

81.White, W.M., et al. Predictive value of current imaging modalities for the detection of urolithiasis during pregnancy: a multicenter, longitudinal study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 931.

82.Sternberg, K., et al. Pediatric stone disease: an evolving experience. J Urol, 2005. 174: 1711.

83.ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103, 2007. 37.

84.Passerotti, C., et al. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol, 2009. 182: 1829.

85.Tasian, G.E., et al. Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones in children. J Urol, 2014. 192: 1329.

86.Palmer, L.S. Pediatric urologic imaging. Urol Clin North Am, 2006. 33: 409.

87.Riccabona, M., et al. Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology. Minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force session on childhood obstructive uropathy, high-grade fetal hydronephrosis, childhood haematuria, and urolithiasis in childhood. ESPR Annual Congress, Edinburgh, UK, June 2008. Pediatr Radiol, 2009. 39: 891.

88.Darge, K., et al. [Modern ultrasound technologies and their application in pediatric urinary tract imaging]. Radiologe, 2005. 45: 1101.

89.Pepe, P., et al. Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol, 2005. 53: 131.

90.Oner, S., et al. Comparison of spiral CT and US in the evaluation of pediatric urolithiasis. Jbr-btr, 2004. 87: 219.

91.Palmer, J.S., et al. Diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis: role of ultrasound and computerized tomography. J Urol, 2005. 174: 1413.

92.Riccabona, M., et al. Conventional imaging in paediatric uroradiology. Eur J Radiol, 2002. 43: 100.

93.Chateil, J.F., et al. [Practical measurement of radiation dose in pediatric radiology: use of the dose surface product in digital fluoroscopy and for neonatal chest radiographs]. J Radiol, 2004. 85: 619.

94.Stratton, K.L., et al. Implications of ionizing radiation in the pediatric urology patient. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2137.

95.Rob, S., et al. Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol, 2017. 72: 11.

96.Tamm, E.P., et al. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology, 2003. 228: 319.

97.Cody, D.D., et al. Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004. 182: 849.

98.Leppert, A., et al. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced? J Pediatr Surg, 2002. 37: 1441.

99.Pathan, S.A., et al. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016.
387: 1999.

100.Pathan, S.A., et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic. Eur Urol, 2018. 73: 583.

101.Forouzanfar, M.M., et al. Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen with Intravenous Ketorolac in Renal Colic Pain Management; A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med, 2019. 9: e86963.

102.Gu, H.-Y., et al. Increasing Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Reducing Opioids or Paracetamol in the Management of Acute Renal Colic: Based on Three-Stage Study Design of Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol, 2019. 10: 96.

103.Krum, H., et al. Blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Cardiovasc Ther, 2012. 30: 342.

104.Bhala, N., et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet, 2013. 382: 769.

105.Holdgate, A., et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005: CD004137.

106.Abbasi, S., et al. Can low-dose of ketamine reduce the need for morphine in renal colic? A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med, 2018. 36: 376.

107.Hosseininejad, S.M., et al. Comparing the analgesic efficacy of morphine plus ketamine versus morphine plus placebo in patients with acute renal colic: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med, 2019. 37: 1118.

108.Forouzan, A., et al. Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Intravenous Ketamine versus Intravenous Morphine in Reducing Pain of Renal Colic Patients: Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study. Rev Recent Clin Trials, 2019. 14: 280.

109.Metry, A.A., et al. Lornoxicam with Low-Dose Ketamine versus Pethidine to Control Pain of Acute Renal Colic. Pain Res Treat, 2019. 2019: 3976027.

110.Sotoodehnia, M., et al. Low-dose intravenous ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic in an emergency setting: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Korean J Pain, 2019. 32: 97.

111.Beltaief, K., et al. Acupuncture versus titrated morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res, 2018. 11: 335.

112.Kaynar, M., et al. Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic. Am J Emerg Med, 2015. 33: 749.

113.Holdgate, A., et al. Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ, 2004. 328: 1401.

114.Seitz, C., et al. Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol, 2009. 56: 455.

115.Lee, A., et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007: CD002765.

116.Hollingsworth, J.M., et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2016. 355: i6112.

117.Guercio, S., et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol, 2011. 25: 1137.

118.European Medicines Agency. Metamizole containing medicinal products. European Medicines Agency (EMA), 2019. EMA/191666/2019

119.Ramsey, S., et al. Evidence-based drainage of infected hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 185.

120.Lynch, M.F., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteric stent insertion for acute renal deobstruction: Consensus based guidance. Brit J Med Surg Urol, 2008. 1: 120.

121.Pearle, M.S., et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol, 1998. 160: 1260.

122.Wang, C.J., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 415.

123.Marien, T., et al. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases of obstructive pyelonephritis secondary to stones. Urology, 2015. 85: 64.

124.Dellabella, M., et al. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2005. 174: 167.

125.Borghi, L., et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol, 1994. 152: 1095.

126.Porpiglia, F., et al. Effectiveness of nifedipine and deflazacort in the management of distal ureter stones. Urology, 2000. 56: 579.

127.Dellabella, M., et al. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology, 2005. 66: 712.

128.Yilmaz, E., et al. The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alpha1-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2010.

129.Liu, X.J., et al. Role of silodosin as medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urolithiasis, 2017.

130.Hsu, Y.P., et al. Silodosin versus tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2018. 13: e0203035.

131.Pickard, R., et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2015. 386: 341.

132.Furyk, J.S., et al. Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Ann Emerg Med, 2016. 67: 86.

133.Sur, R.L., et al. Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 959.

134.Turk, C., et al. Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureterolithiasis: The EAU Recommendations in 2016. Eur Urol, 2016.

135.Ye, Z., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones with Renal Colic: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Eur Urol, 2017.

136.Bai, Y., et al. Tadalafil Facilitates the Distal Ureteral Stone Expulsion: A Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 557.

137.Porpiglia, F., et al. Corticosteroids and tamsulosin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureter stones: single drug or association? Eur Urol, 2006. 50: 339.

138.Kachrilas, S., et al. The current role of percutaneous chemolysis in the management of urolithiasis: review and results. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 323.

139.Bernardo, N.O., et al. Chemolysis of urinary calculi. Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 355.

140.Tiselius, H.G., et al. Minimally invasive treatment of infection staghorn stones with shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1999. 33: 286.

141.Rodman, J.S., et al. Dissolution of uric acid calculi. J Urol, 1984. 131: 1039.

142.Becker, G. Uric acid stones. Nephrology, 2007. 12: S21.

143.Elsawy Amr, A., et al. Can We Predict the Outcome of Oral Dissolution Therapy for Radiolucent Renal Calculi? A Prospective Study. J Urol, 2019. 201: 350.

144.El-Gamal, O., et al. Role of combined use of potassium citrate and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 219.

145.Elbaset, M.A., et al. Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1–2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment—a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 207.

146.Musa, A.A. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2008. 40: 19.

147.Shen, P., et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1328.

148.Wang, H., et al. Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0167670.

149.Ghoneim, I.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology, 2010. 75: 45.

150.Platonov, M.A., et al. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: evidence-based guidelines for the modern era. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 243.

151.Li, W.M., et al. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int, 2007. 79: 124.

152.Yilmaz, E., et al. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urology, 2005. 66: 1160.

153.Pace, K.T., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol, 2005. 174: 595.

154.Madbouly, K., et al. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 127.

155.Semins, M.J., et al. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2008. 179: 194.

156.Li, K., et al. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1260.

157.Nguyen, D.P., et al. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 418.

158.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 537.

159.Kang, D.H., et al. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2016.
11: e0158661.

160.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy versus slow power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in stones with high attenuation value: A randomized comparative study. Int
J Urol, 2020. 27: 165.

161.Connors, B.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int, 2009. 104: 1004.

162.Moon, K.B., et al. Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Urol, 2012. 53: 790.

163.Ng, C.F., et al. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute. J Urol, 2012. 188: 837.

164.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones: A randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 33.

165.Lopez-Acon, J.D., et al. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Increasing the Energy Dose Applied Per Session by Increasing the Number of Shock Waves in Extracorporeal Lithotripsy: A Prospective and Comparative Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1289.

166.Connors, B.A., et al. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int, 2009. 103: 104.

167.Handa, R.K., et al. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int, 2012. 110: E1041.

168.Skuginna, V., et al. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 267.

169.Maloney, M.E., et al. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 603.

170.Demirci, D., et al. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 1407.

171.Honey, R.J., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology, 2010. 75: 38.

172.Ng, C.F., et al. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Urol, 2019. 202: 986.

173.Abdelbary, A.M., et al. Value of early second session shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of upper ureteric stones compared to laser ureteroscopy. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3089.

174.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol, 2006. 176: 2706.

175.Jain, A., et al. Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1680.

176.Van Besien, J., et al. Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study. Biomed Res Int, 2017. 2017: 7802672.

177.Eichel, L., et al. Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-generation lithotripters. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 671.

178.Sorensen, C., et al. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol, 2002. 168: 35.

179.Cleveland, R.O., et al. Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol, 2004. 18: 629.

180.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2017. 43: 394.

181.Honey, R.J., et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 2112.

182.Lu, Y., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for shock wave lithotripsy in patients with sterile urine before treatment may be unnecessary: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2012. 188: 441.

183.Chen, K., et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1166.

184.Naja, V., et al. Tamsulosin facilitates earlier clearance of stone fragments and reduces pain after shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi: results from an open-label randomized study. Urology, 2008. 72: 1006.

185.Zhu, Y., et al. alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2010. 106: 256.

186.Zheng, S., et al. Tamsulosin as adjunctive treatment after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010.
44: 425.

187.Schuler, T.D., et al. Medical expulsive therapy as an adjunct to improve shockwave lithotripsy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 387.

188.Li, M., et al. Adjunctive medical therapy with alpha-blocker after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015. 10: e0122497.

189.Skolarikos, A., et al. The Efficacy of Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) in Improving Stone-free Rate and Stone Expulsion Time, After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology, 2015. 86: 1057.

190.De Nunzio, C., et al. Tamsulosin or Silodosin Adjuvant Treatment Is Ineffective in Improving Shockwave Lithotripsy Outcome: A Short-Term Follow-Up Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 817.

191.Aamir Ali, S., et al. Comparison of efficacy with & without Tamsulosin as medical adjuvant therapy after Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in renal stone. RMJ, 2018. 43: 471.

192.Zeng, T., et al. Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2020. 48: 95.

193.Jing, S., et al. Modified Mechanical Percussion for Upper Urinary Tract Stone Fragments After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology, 2018. 116: 47.

194.Liu, L.R., et al. Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013: Cd008569.

195.Tao, R.Z., et al. External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. Urolithiasis, 2018.

196.Yuan, C., et al. Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 712.

197.Pearle, M.S., et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2005.

198.Lingeman, J.E., et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 1987. 138: 485.

199.Preminger, G.M., et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol, 2007.
52: 1610.

200.Lingeman, J.E., et al. Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis. JAMA, 1990. 263: 1789.

201.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol, 2006. 175: 1742.

202.Eassa, W.A., et al. Prospective study of the long-term effects of shock wave lithotripsy on renal function and blood pressure. J Urol, 2008. 179: 964.

203.Yu, C., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 719.

204.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Long-term Adverse Effects of Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Urology, 2015. 85: 991.

205.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes after exposure to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi: a retrospective non-randomized data analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2018. 50: 1227.

206.Chen, C.S., et al. Subcapsular hematoma of spleen--a complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculus. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi, 1992. 15: 215.

207.Skolarikos, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention. Eur Urol, 2006. 50: 981.

208.Osman, M.M., et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2005. 47: 860.

209.Tan, Y.M., et al. Clinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospital. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2002.
36: 363.

210.Muller-Mattheis, V.G., et al. Bacteremia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi. J Urol, 1991. 146: 733.

211.Dhar, N.B., et al. A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2004. 172: 2271.

212.Zanetti, G., et al. Cardiac dysrhythmias induced by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
J Endourol, 1999. 13: 409.

213.Rodrigues Netto, N., Jr., et al. Small-bowel perforation after shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2003. 17: 719.

214.Holmberg, G., et al. Perforation of the bowel during SWL in prone position. J Endourol, 1997. 11: 313.

215.Maker, V., et al. Gastrointestinal injury secondary to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a review of the literature since its inception. J Am Coll Surg, 2004. 198: 128.

216.Kim, T.B., et al. Life-threatening complication after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a renal stone: a hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Korean J Urol, 2010. 51: 212.

217.Ng, C.F., et al. Hepatic haematoma after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 785.

218.Ather, M.H., et al. Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications? Urol Int, 2009. 83: 222.

219.Madbouly, K., et al. Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1239.

220.Sayed, M.A., et al. Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int, 2001. 88: 675.

221.Wendt-Nordahl, G., et al. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res, 2011. 39: 185.

222.Wang, Q., et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0171478.

223.Wang, Y., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 50.

224.Sun, X., et al. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. J Endourol, 2008.
22: 913.

225.el-Nahas, A.R., et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology, 2006. 68: 500.

226.Moufid, K., et al. Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position. Urol Ann, 2013. 5: 140.

227.El-Assmy, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology, 2005. 66: 510.

228.Deng, T., et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1687.

229.Binbay, M., et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1929.

230.Geraghty, R., et al. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep, 2015. 16: 54.

231.Auge, B.K., et al. Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole renal calculi: technique of calculus displacement. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 835.

232.Luo, Z., et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2020. 82: 36.

233.Schembri, M., et al. Outcomes of loco-regional anaesthesia in ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2020. 30: 726.

234.Wu, T., et al. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2017. 99: 308.

235.Agrawal, S., et al. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3957.

236.Van Compernolle, D., et al. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1454.

237.Dragos, L.B., et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol, 2019. 8: S359.

238.Dickstein, R.J., et al. Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1589.

239.Eandi, J.A., et al. Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1653.

240.Ulvik, O., et al. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol, 2013. 27: 1197.

241.Ambani, S.N., et al. Ureteral stents for impassable ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2013. 27: 549.

242.Pace, K.T., et al. Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study. J Urol, 2017. 198: 130.

243.Ge, H., et al. Bilateral Same-Session Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1169.

244.Karim, S.S., et al. Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature. Urolithiasis, 2020. 48: 263.

245.Lane, J., et al. Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature. Current Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 17.

246.Stern, J.M., et al. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 119.

247.L’Esperance J, O., et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology, 2005. 66: 252.

248.Traxer, O., et al. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol, 2013. 189: 580.

249.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1257.

250.Traxer, O., et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015. 33: 2137.

251.Stern, K.L., et al. A Prospective Study Analyzing the Association Between High-grade Ureteral Access Sheath Injuries and the Formation of Ureteral Strictures. Urology, 2019. 128: 38.

252.Lima, A., et al. Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1329.

253.Santiago, J.E., et al. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Curr Urol Rep, 2017. 18: 32.

254.Bach, T., et al. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter? J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1639.

255.Leijte, J.A., et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 257.

256.Pierre, S., et al. Holmium laser for stone management. World J Urol, 2007. 25: 235.

257.Ventimiglia, E., et al. High- and Low-Power Laser Lithotripsy Achieves Similar Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Available Clinical Series. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1146.

258.Garg, S., et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study. Urol Int, 2009. 82: 341.

259.Binbay, M., et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 2011. 43: 989.

260.Ahmed, M., et al. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology, 2009. 73: 976.

261.John, T.T., et al. Adjunctive tamsulosin improves stone free rate after ureteroscopic lithotripsy of large renal and ureteric calculi: a prospective randomized study. Urology, 2010. 75: 1040.

262.Martov, A.G., et al. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 795.

263.Kronenberg, P., et al. Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2021. 31: 80.

264.Assimos, D., et al. Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int, 2016. 117: 648.

265.Jessen, J.P., et al. International Collaboration in Endourology: Multicenter Evaluation of Prestenting for Ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 268.

266.Song, T., et al. Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 67.

267.Haleblian, G., et al. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol, 2008. 179: 424.

268.Nabi, G., et al. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2007. 334: 572.

269.Seklehner, S., et al. A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal. Int Urol Nephrol, 2017. 49: 753.

270.Moon, T.D. Ureteral stenting--an obsolete procedure? J Urol, 2002. 167: 1984.

271.Wang, C.J., et al. Effects of specific alpha-1A/1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospectively randomized study. Urol Res, 2009. 37: 147.

272.Lamb, A.D., et al. Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of alpha-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort. BJU Int, 2011. 108: 1894.

273.Kim, J.K., et al. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus, 2021.

274.Geavlete, P., et al. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 179.

275.Perez Castro, E., et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol, 2014. 66: 102.

276.Bhojani, N., et al. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 991.

277.De Coninck, V., et al. Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol, 2020.
38: 2147.

278.Bhanot, R., et al. Predictors and Strategies to Avoid Mortality Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Sections of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol Focus, 2021.

279.Chugh, S., et al. Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS). Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 16.

280.Tokas, T., et al. Role of Intrarenal Pressure in Modern Day Endourology (Mini-PCNL and Flexible URS): a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2021. 22: 52.

281.Zeng, G., et al. Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20–40mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol, 2021. 79: 114.

282.Ruhayel, Y., et al. Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol, 2017. 72: 220.

283.Tikkinen, K.A.O., et al., EAU Guidelines on Thromboprophylaxis in Urological Surgery, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 32nd EAU Annual Meeting, London, 2017, Editor, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

284.Ganesamoni, R., et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laser lithotripsy with pneumatic lithotripsy in miniperc for renal calculi. J Endourol, 2013. 27: 1444.

285.Mak, D.K., et al. What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - Prone or supine? A systematic review. Arab J Urol, 2016. 14: 101.

286.Li, J., et al. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg, 2019. 66: 62.

287.Cracco, C.M., et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: S46.

288.Corrales, M., et al. Ultrasound or Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access, Is There Really a Difference? A Review of Literature. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 241.

289.Zhu, W., et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2017.
119: 612.

290.El-Shaer, W., et al. Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study. Urology, 2019. 128: 31.

291.Isac, W., et al. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology, 2013. 81: 251.

292.Falahatkar, S., et al. Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial. Int Braz J Urol, 2016. 42: 710.

293.Srivastava, A., et al. A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 803.

294.Armas-Phan, M., et al. Ultrasound guidance can be used safely for renal tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2020. 125: 284.

295.Tzelves, L., et al. Suction Use During Endourological Procedures. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 46.

296.Lu, Y., et al. Randomized prospective trial of tubeless versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1303.

297.Cormio, L., et al. Exit strategies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a comparison of surgical outcomes in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1239.

298.Lee, J.Y., et al. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 48.

299.Garofalo, M., et al. Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 347.

300.Seitz, C., et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol, 2012. 61: 146.

301.Yu, J., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1685.

302.Yoshida, S., et al. The significance of intraoperative renal pelvic urine and stone cultures for patients at a high risk of post-ureteroscopy systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 533.

303.Wu, C., et al. Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 36.

304.Mariappan, P., et al. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 1610.

305.Lo, C.W., et al. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics against Post-Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2015. 16: 415.

306.Gravas, S., et al. Postoperative infection rates in low risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a matched case control study. J Urol, 2012. 188: 843.

307.Chew, B.H., et al. A Single Dose of Intraoperative Antibiotics Is Sufficient to Prevent Urinary Tract Infection During Ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 63.

308.Klingler, H.C., et al. Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol, 2003. 43: 75.

309.Kefer, J.C., et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in patients on anticoagulant therapy. J Urol, 2009. 181: 144.

310.Baron, T.H., et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med, 2013. 368: 2113.

311.Naspro, R., et al. Antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stent undergoing urologic surgery: is it still no man’s land? Eur Urol, 2013. 64: 101.

312.Eberli, D., et al. Urological surgery and antiplatelet drugs after cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2128.

313.Razvi, H., et al. Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1478.

314.Rassweiler, J.J., et al. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update. Eur Urol, 2001. 39: 187.

315.Fischer, C., et al. [Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy induced ultrastructural changes to the renal parenchyma under aspirin use. Electron microscopic findings in the rat kidney]. Urologe A, 2007.
46: 150.

316.Becopoulos, T., et al. Extracorporeal lithotripsy in patients with hemophilia. Eur Urol, 1988. 14: 343.

317.Ishikawa, J., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in von Willebrand’s disease. Int J Urol, 1996. 3: 58.

318.Zanetti, G., et al. Cardiac dysrhythmiastreated with antithrombotic agents. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 237.

319.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Incidence and risk factors of renal hematoma: a prospective study of 1,300 SWL treatments. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 247.

320.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Antiplatelet and anticoagulative medication during shockwave lithotripsy.
J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1034.

321.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 298.

322.Elkoushy, M.A., et al. Ureteroscopy in patients with coagulopathies is associated with lower stone-free rate and increased risk of clinically significant hematuria. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 195.

323.Sharaf, A., et al. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1217.

324.Sahin, C., et al. Transient cessation of antiplatelet medication before percutaneous stone surgery: does it have any safety concern on bleeding related problems? Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 371.

325.Kuo, R.L., et al. Use of ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser in patients with bleeding diatheses. Urology, 1998. 52: 609.

326.Altay, B., et al. A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Lasers Med Sci, 2017. 32: 1615.

327.Gupta, A.D., et al. Coronary stent management in elective genitourinary surgery. BJU Int, 2012.
110: 480.

328.Delakas, D., et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol, 2003. 17: 201.

329.Lee, J.Y., et al. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: 23988.

330.Ohmori, K., et al. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol, 1994. 151: 255.

331.Streem, S.B., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol, 1990. 144: 1347.

332.Carey, S.W., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with calcified ipsilateral renal arterial or abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Urol, 1992. 148: 18.

333.Reeves, T., et al. Role of Endourological Procedures (PCNL and URS) on Renal Function: a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 21.

334.Skolarikos, A., et al. The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 923.

335.Yallappa, S., et al. Natural History of Conservatively Managed Ureteral Stones: Analysis of 6600 Patients. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 371.

336.Xu, B., et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of sexual intercourse for distal ureteric stones. J Int Med Res, 2019. 47: 497.

337.Skolarikos, A., et al. Indications, prediction of success and methods to improve outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2010. 82: 56.

338.Cui, X., et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. Urology, 2015. 85: 748.

339.Ishii, H., et al. Outcomes of Systematic Review of Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in the Obese and Morbidly Obese Population. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 135.

340.Drake, T., et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Eur Urol, 2017.
72: 772.

341.Han, D.S., et al. The Durability of Active Surveillance in Patients with Asymptomatic Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 598.

342.Inci, K., et al. Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2189.

343.Brandt, B., et al. Painful caliceal calculi. The treatment of small nonobstructing caliceal calculi in patients with symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1993. 27: 75.

344.Burgher, A., et al. Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol, 2004. 18: 534.

345.Hubner, W., et al. Treatment of caliceal calculi. Br J Urol, 1990. 66: 9.

346.Keeley, F.X., Jr., et al. Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int, 2001. 87: 1.

347.Glowacki, L.S., et al. The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis. J Urol, 1992. 147: 319.

348.Collins, J.W., et al. Is there a role for prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones? Curr Opin Urol, 2002. 12: 281.

349.Rebuck, D.A., et al. The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology, 2011. 77: 564.

350.Andersson, L., et al. Small renal caliceal calculi as a cause of pain. J Urol, 1983. 130: 752.

351.Mee, S.L., et al. Small caliceal stones: is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy justified? J Urol, 1988. 139: 908.

352.Argyropoulos, A.N., et al. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol, 2010. 20: 154.

353.Srisubat, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014. 11: CD007044.

354.Sahinkanat, T., et al. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones. Urology, 2008. 71: 801.

355.Danuser, H., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol, 2007. 52: 539.

356.Preminger, G.M. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 108.

357.Zheng, C., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 549.

358.Zheng, C., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 417.

359.Karakoyunlu, N., et al. A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 283.

360.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 612.

361.Kumar, A., et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol, 2015. 193: 160.

362.Sener, N.C., et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 127.

363.Manikandan, R., et al. Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? Urology, 2007. 69: 620.

364.De, S., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 125.

365.Sener, N.C., et al. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial. Urology, 2015. 85: 33.

366.Kumar, A., et al. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones </=2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
J Endourol, 2015. 29: 575.

367.Mi, Y., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2016.
44: 353.

368.Zhang, W., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 745.

369.Junbo, L., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J, 2019. 16: 97.

370.Tsai, S.H., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020. 99: e19403.

371.Zhang, H., et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi. Urol Int, 2019. 102: 153.

372.Kallidonis, P., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol, 2020. 204: 427.

373.Barone, B., et al. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 441.

374.Torricelli, F.C.M., et al. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
J Endourol, 2020. 34: 63.

375.Madbouly, K., et al. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol, 2001. 165: 1415.

376.Abdelhamid, M., et al. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1227.

377.Gupta, N.P., et al. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2000. 163: 24.

378.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography. J Urol, 2015. 193: 2002.

379.Sumino, Y., et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2002. 168: 1344.

380.Chiong, E., et al. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005.
65: 1070.

381.Chan, L.H., et al. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 510.

382.Hyams, E.S., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol, 2010.
24: 1583.

383.Riley, J.M., et al. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol, 2009.
23: 1395.

384.Akman, T., et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int, 2012. 109: 1384.

385.Assimos, D.G., et al. The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
J Urol, 1989. 142: 263.

386.Segura, J.W. Current surgical approaches to nephrolithiasis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 1990. 19: 919.

387.Honeck, P., et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1209.

388.Bichler, K.H., et al. Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi. Urol Int, 1997. 59: 102.

389.Paik, M.L., et al. Is there a role for open stone surgery? Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 323.

390.Alivizatos, G., et al. Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? Curr Opin Urol, 2006. 16: 106.

391.Basiri, A., et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J, 2014. 11: 1932.

392.Prakash, J., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 133.

393.Al-Hunayan, A., et al. Management of solitary renal pelvic stone: laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2011. 25: 975.

394.Skolarikos, A., et al. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review. Urol Res, 2010. 38: 337.

395.Giedelman, C., et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: developments of the technique in the era of minimally invasive surgery. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 444.

396.Wang, X., et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2013. 190: 888.

397.Singh, V., et al. Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones. Urol Int, 2014. 92: 392.

398.Kumar, A., et al. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1248.

399.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol, 2016. 42: 645.

400.Hossein, S.M., et al. Stented Versus Stentless Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoen Adv Surg Tech, 2017. 27: 1269.

401.Mao, T., et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res, 2021.
49: 300060520983136.

402.Xiao, Y., et al. Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1441.

403.Muller, P.F., et al. Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review. Arab J Urol, 2018. 16: 357.

404.Coptcoat, M.J., et al. The steinstrasse: a legacy of extracorporeal lithotripsy? Eur Urol, 1988. 14: 93.

405.Lucio, J., 2nd, et al. Steinstrasse predictive factors and outcomes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 477.

406.Moursy, E., et al. Tamsulosin as an expulsive therapy for steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010. 44: 315.

407.Resim, S., et al. Role of tamsulosin in treatment of patients with steinstrasse developing after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005. 66: 945.

408.Rabbani, S.M. Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy. Urol J, 2008. 5: 89.

409.Chew, B.H., et al. Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium.
J Urol, 2016. 195: 982.

410.Candau, C., et al. Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 18.

411.Olvera-Posada, D., et al. Natural History of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of Factors Related to Clinical Events and Intervention. Urology, 2016. 97: 46.

412.Portis, A.J., et al. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology, 2008. 71: 218.

413.Tokas, T., et al. Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature. World J Urol, 2017.
35: 897.

414.Omar, M., et al. Contemporary Imaging Practice Patterns Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1122.

415.Rippel, C.A., et al. Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol, 2012. 188: 2246.

416.Gokce, M.I., et al. Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy. Int Braz J Urol, 2015.
41: 86.

417.Beck, E.M., et al. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol, 1991. 145: 6.

418.El-Nahas, A.R., et al. Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 870.

419.Buchholz, N.P., et al. Minor residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: spontaneous clearance or risk factor for recurrent stone formation? J Endourol, 1997. 11: 227.

420.McKnoulty, M., et al. Spontaneous renal fornix rupture in pregnancy and the post partum period: a systematic review of outcomes and management. BMC Urology, 2020. 20: 116.

421.Tsai, Y.L., et al. Comparative study of conservative and surgical management for symptomatic moderate and severe hydronephrosis in pregnancy: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007. 86: 1047.

422.Mokhmalji, H., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol, 2001. 165: 1088.

423.Dai, J.C., et al. Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two. Urology, 2021. 151: 44.

424.Ngai, H.Y., et al. Double-J ureteric stenting in pregnancy: A single-centre experience from Iraq. Arab J Urol, 2013. 11: 148.

425.Ishii, H., et al. Current status of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 1.

426.Teleb, M., et al. Definitive ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral calculi during pregnancy. Arab J Urol, 2014. 12: 299.

427.Ramachandra, M., et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) during pregnancy: A review of literature. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: 89.

428.Holmes, D.G., et al. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology, 2002. 60: 603.

429.Yang, W.J., et al. Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer. Urology, 2006. 68: 324.

430.Assimos, D.G. Nephrolithiasis in patients with urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 69.

431.Cohen, T.D., et al. Long-term incidence and risks for recurrent stones following contemporary management of upper tract calculi in patients with a urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 62.

432.Deliveliotis, C., et al. Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. J Endourol, 2002. 16: 717.

433.Ramachandra, M.N., et al. Challenges of Retrograde Ureteroscopy in Patients with Urinary Diversion: Outcomes and Lessons Learnt from a Systematic Review of Literature. Urol Int, 2018. 101: 249.

434.Stein, J.P., et al. Complications of the afferent antireflux valve mechanism in the Kock ileal reservoir. J Urol, 1996. 155: 1579.

435.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol, 2003. 170: 45.

436.Hensle, T.W., et al. Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU Int, 2004. 93: 585.

437.Raj, G.V., et al. The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol, 1999. 162: 1238.

438.Gros, D.A., et al. Urolithiasis in spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 1998. 8 Suppl 1: 68.

439.Kondo, A., et al. [Urolithiasis in those patients with myelodysplasia]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 2003. 94: 15.

440.Rendeli, C., et al. Latex sensitisation and allergy in children with myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst, 2006. 22: 28.

441.Christman, M.S., et al. Morbidity and efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1479.

442.Klingler, H.C., et al. Urolithiasis in allograft kidneys. Urology, 2002. 59: 344.

443.Cheungpasitporn, W., et al. Incidence of kidney stones in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Transplant, 2016. 6: 790.

444.Harper, J.M., et al. Risk factors for calculus formation in patients with renal transplants. Br J Urol, 1994. 74: 147.

445.Challacombe, B., et al. Multimodal management of urolithiasis in renal transplantation. BJU Int, 2005. 96: 385.

446.Rifaioglu, M.M., et al. Percutaneous management of stones in transplanted kidneys. Urology, 2008. 72: 508.

447.Gupta, M., et al. Treatment of stones associated with complex or anomalous renal anatomy. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 431.

448.Minon Cifuentes, J., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in transplanted kidney. Urology, 1991.
38: 232.

449.Wyatt, J., et al. Treatment outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal allografts.
J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1821.

450.Lu, H.F., et al. Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis: early percutaneous management. Urology, 2002. 59: 25.

451.Del Pizzo, J.J., et al. Ureteroscopic evaluation in renal transplant recipients. J Endourol, 1998. 12: 135.

452.Basiri, A., et al. Ureteroscopic management of urological complications after renal transplantation. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2006. 40: 53.

453.Reeves, T., et al. Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2019. 29: 548.

454.Parkhomenko, E., et al. Percutaneous Management of Stone Containing Calyceal Diverticula: Associated Factors and Outcomes. J Urol, 2017. 198: 864.

455.Bas, O., et al. Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 155.

456.Gaur, D.D. Retroperitoneal endoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience in 12 patients. J Endourol, 1993. 7: 501.

457.Gaur, D.D., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol, 1994. 151: 927.

458.Locke, D.R., et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology, 1990.
35: 407.

459.Lavan, L., et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1135.

460.Chen, H., et al. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Urol Int, 2019. 103: 249.

461.Salvi, M., et al. Active treatment of renal stones in pelvic ectopic kidney: systematic review of literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 691.

462.Gelet, A., et al. Endopyelotomy with the Acucise cutting balloon device. Early clinical experience. Eur Urol, 1997. 31: 389.

463.Faerber, G.J., et al. Retrograde treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the ureteral cutting balloon catheter. J Urol, 1997. 157: 454.

464.Berkman, D.S., et al. Treatment outcomes after endopyelotomy performed with or without simultaneous nephrolithotomy: 10-year experience. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1409.

465.Nakada, S.Y., et al. Retrospective analysis of the effect of crossing vessels on successful retrograde endopyelotomy outcomes using spiral computerized tomography angiography. J Urol, 1998. 159: 62.

466.Skolarikos, A., et al. Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 5.

467.Ward, J.B., et al. Pediatric Urinary Stone Disease in the United States: The Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urology, 2019. 129: 180.

468.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Epidemiologic insights into pediatric kidney stone disease. Urol Res, 2010.
38: 453.

469.Alfandary, H., et al. Increasing Prevalence of Nephrolithiasis in Association with Increased Body Mass Index in Children: A Population Based Study. J Urol, 2018. 199: 1044.

470.Novak, T.E., et al. Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology, 2009. 74: 104.

471.Bevill, M., et al. The Modern Metabolic Stone Evaluation in Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 15.

472.Kovacevic, L., et al. From hypercalciuria to hypocitraturia--a shifting trend in pediatric urolithiasis?
J Urol, 2012. 188: 1623.

473.Cambareri, G.M., et al. National multi-institutional cooperative on urolithiasis in children: Age is a significant predictor of urine abnormalities. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 218.

474.Braun, D.A., et al. Prevalence of Monogenic Causes in Pediatric Patients with Nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016. 11: 664.

475.Kant, A.K., et al. Contributors of water intake in US children and adolescents: associations with dietary and meal characteristics--National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. Am J Clin Nutr, 2010. 92: 887.

476.Cogswell, M.E., et al. Vital signs: sodium intake among U.S. school-aged children - 2009-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2014. 63: 789.

477.Clark, M.A., et al. Nutritional quality of the diets of US public school children and the role of the school meal programs. J Am Diet Assoc, 2009. 109: S44.

478.Andrioli, V., et al. Infant nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis: Natural history and predictors of surgical intervention. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 355 e1.

479.Sas, D.J., et al. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of children with nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 241.

480.Telli, O., et al. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting? Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 853.

481.Dos Santos, J., et al. Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children. J Urol, 2016. 195: 1289.

482.Dincel, N., et al. Are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Pediatr Surg, 2013. 48: 840.

483.Tian, D., et al. The efficacy and safety of adrenergic alpha-antagonists in treatment of distal ureteral stones in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg, 2017. 52: 360.

484.Barreto, L., et al. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018. 6: CD010784.

485.Lu, P., et al. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 199.

486.Dogan, H.S., et al. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 84 e1.

487.Alsagheer, G., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 515 e1.

488.Zeng, G., et al. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 599.

489.Badawy, A.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol, 2012. 44: 661.

490.Jee, J.Y., et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric and adolescent urolithiasis. Korean J Urol, 2013. 54: 865.

491.Cevik, B., et al. Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 363.

492.Kumar, A., et al. A Single Center Experience Comparing Miniperc and Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Radiopaque 1-2 cm Lower Caliceal Renal Calculi in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 805.

493.Wang, H.H., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children’s hospitals. J Urol, 2012. 187: 1402.

494.Jurkiewicz, B., et al. Ureterolithotripsy in a paediatric population: a single institution’s experience. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 171.

495.Elsheemy, M.S., et al. Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in children: predictive factors for complications and success. World J Urol, 2014. 32: 985.

496.Ishii, H., et al. Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: a systematic review. BJU Int, 2015. 115: 867.

497.Tanriverdi, O., et al. Comparison of ureteroscopic procedures with rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes in pediatric population: does the caliber of instrument matter? Pediatr Surg Int, 2010. 26: 733.

498.Dogan, H.S., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turk Pediatr Urol Soc. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1035.

499.Gokce, M.I., et al. Effect of Prestenting on Success and Complication Rates of Ureterorenoscopy in Pediatric Population. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 850.

500.Ellison, J.S., et al. Risk factors for repeat surgical intervention in pediatric nephrolithiasis: A Pediatric Health Information System database study. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 245 e1.

501.Unsal, A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Surg, 2011. 46: 2195.

502.Erkurt, B., et al. Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 241.

503.Suliman, A., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy to treat upper urinary tract stones in children. Urolithiasis, 2018.

504.Xiao, J., et al. Treatment of upper urinary tract stones with flexible ureteroscopy in children. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018.

505.Tiryaki, T., et al. Ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral stones in children: factors influencing the outcome. Urology, 2013. 81: 1047.

506.Mokhless, I.A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol, 2014. 191: 1496.

507.Saad, K.S., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Large Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 1716.

508.Pelit, E.S., et al. Comparison of Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Preschool-aged Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 21.

509.Bas, O., et al. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderately Sized Pediatric Kidney Stones. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 765.

510.Chen, Y., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2018.

511.Cicekbilek, I., et al. Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: assessment by quantitative SPECT of (99m)Tc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys. Ren Fail, 2015. 37: 1118.

512.Celik, H., et al. Comparison of the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy with different sized instruments. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 203.

513.Dombrovskiy, V., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: Analysis of Nationwide Hospitalizations and Short-Term Outcomes for the United States, 2001-2014. J Endourol, 2018.
32: 912.

514.Senocak, C., et al. Predictive factors of bleeding among pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 383.

515.Jones, P., et al. Role of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques-Micro and Ultra-Mini PCNL (<15F) in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 816.

516.Guven, S., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int, 2013. 111: 148.

517.Onal, B., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol, 2014. 191: 777.

518.Aghamir, S.M., et al. Comparing Bleeding Complications of Double and Single Access Totally Tubeless PCNL: Is It Safe to Obtain More Accesses? Urol Int, 2016. 96: 73.

519.Iqbal, N., et al. Comparison of outcomes of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study. Turk J Urol, 2018. 44: 56.

520.Samad, L., et al. Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children cause significant renal scarring?
J Pediatr Urol, 2007. 3: 36.

521.Modi, P.K., et al. Pediatric hospitalizations for upper urinary tract calculi: Epidemiological and treatment trends in the United States, 2001-2014. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 13 e1.

522.Agrawal, V., et al. Laparoscopic management of pediatric renal and ureteric stones. J Pediatr Urol, 2013. 9: 230.

523.Srivastava, A., et al. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in Children: With and Without Stent - Initial Tertiary Care Center Experience with More Than 1-Year Follow-Up. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2017. 27: 150.

524.Lee, R.S., et al. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2306.

525.Dai, J.C., et al. National Trends in CT Utilization and Estimated CT-related Radiation Exposure in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Stone Patients. Urology, 2019. 133: 50.

526.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures: IAEA-SEGUR study. J Radiol Prot, 2020.

527.Yecies, T., et al. Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology. Can J Urol, 2018. 25: 9154.

528.Jindal, T. The risk of radiation exposure to assisting staff in urological procedures: a literature review. Urol Nurs, 2013. 33: 136.

529.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation Exposure of Surgical Team During Endourological Procedures: International Atomic Energy Agency-South-Eastern European Group for Urolithiasis Research Study. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 574.

530.Pierce, D.A., et al. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res, 2000. 154: 178.

531.Preston, D.L., et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res, 2007. 168: 1.

532.Pearce, M.S., et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 2012. 380: 499.

533.Mathews, J.D., et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ, 2013. 346: f2360.

534.Berrington de González, A., et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med, 2009. 169: 2071.

535.Brenner, D.J., et al. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl
J Med, 2007. 357: 2277.

536.Wrixon, A.D. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot, 2008. 28: 161.

537.Kim, C.H., et al. Are Urologists Performing Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Safe From Radiation Exposure? A Guidance to Reduce the Radiation Dose. Urology, 2016. 95: 54.

538.Singh, V., et al. Prospective randomized comparison between fluoroscopy-guided ureteroscopy versus ureteroscopy with real-time ultrasonography for the management of ureteral stones. Urol Ann, 2016. 8: 418.

539.Mohey, A., et al. Fluoroless-ureteroscopy for definitive management of distal ureteral calculi: randomized controlled trial. Can J Urol, 2018. 25: 9205.

540.Subiela, J.D., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones. J Endourol, 2021.
35: 417.

541.Peng, L., et al. Fluoroless versus conventional ureteroscopy for urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 299.

542.Parks, J.H., et al. A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1607.

543.Nayan, M., et al. Variations between two 24-hour urine collections in patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic. Can Urol Assoc J, 2012. 6: 30.

544.Williams, J.C., Jr., et al. Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference. Urolithiasis, 2021. 49: 1.

545.Ferraz, R.R., et al. Preservation of urine samples for metabolic evaluation of stone-forming patients. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 329.

546.Porowski, T., et al. Assessment of Lithogenic Risk in Children Based on a Morning Spot Urine Sample. J Urol, 2010. 184: 2103.

547.Coe, F.L., et al. Kidney stone disease. J Clin Invest, 2005. 115: 2598.

548.Norman, R.W., et al. When should patients with symptomatic urinary stone disease be evaluated metabolically? J Urol, 1984. 132: 1137.

549.Urine evaluation (in: Evaluation of the stone former), In: 2ND International Consultation on Stone Disease, H.M. Assimos D. Chew B, Hautmann R, Holmes R, Williams J, Wolf JS, Editor. 2007, Health Publications.

550.Hesse A, et al. Urinary Stones: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence., In: Uric acid stones. 2002, S Karger AG,: Basel.

551.Tiselius, H.G. Standardized estimate of the ion activity product of calcium oxalate in urine from renal stone formers. Eur Urol, 1989. 16: 48.

552.Ackermann, D., et al. Use of the computer program EQUIL to estimate pH in model solutions and human urine. Urol Res, 1989. 17: 157.

553.Kavanagh, J.P., et al. Why does the Bonn Risk Index discriminate between calcium oxalate stone formers and healthy controls? J Urol, 2006. 175: 766.

554.Rodgers A.L., et al. JESS: What can it teach us?, In: Proceedings of Renal Stone Disease 1st Annual International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, 2-3 November 2006., A.P. Evan, Jr, Editor. 2007, American Institute of Physics: Melville, New York

555.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol, 2010. 25: 403.

556.Sarica, K., et al. The effect of calcium channel blockers on stone regrowth and recurrence after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 184.

557.Fink, H.A., et al. Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline. Ann Intern Med, 2013. 158: 535.

558.Borghi, L., et al. Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol, 1996. 155: 839.

559.Bao, Y., et al. Water for preventing urinary stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012: Cd004292.

560.Siener, R., et al. Dietary risk factors for hyperoxaluria in calcium oxalate stone formers. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1037.

561.Wabner, C.L., et al. Effect of orange juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 1993. 149: 1405.

562.Gettman, M.T., et al. Effect of cranberry juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 2005. 174: 590.

563.Shuster, J., et al. Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: a randomized prevention trial. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992. 45: 911.

564.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Soda and other beverages and the risk of kidney stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1389.

565.Kocvara, R., et al. A prospective study of nonmedical prophylaxis after a first kidney stone. BJU Int, 1999. 84: 393.

566.Hess, B., et al. Effects of a ‘common sense diet’ on urinary composition and supersaturation in patients with idiopathic calcium urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 1999. 36: 136.

567.Ebisuno, S., et al. Results of long-term rice bran treatment on stone recurrence in hypercalciuric patients. Br J Urol, 1991. 67: 237.

568.Hiatt, R.A., et al. Randomized controlled trial of a low animal protein, high fiber diet in the prevention of recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones. Am J Epidemiol, 1996. 144: 25.

569.Dussol, B., et al. A randomized trial of low-animal-protein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephron Clin Pract, 2008. 110: c185.

570.Turney, B.W., et al. Diet and risk of kidney stones in the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Eur J Epidemiol, 2014. 29: 363.

571.Asplin, J.R. The management of patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 33.

572.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Vitamin C Intake and Risk of Incident Kidney Stones. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016. 67: 400.

573.Fink, H.A., et al. Diet, fluid, or supplements for secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol, 2009. 56: 72.

574.Borghi, L., et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346: 77.

575.Curhan, G.C., et al. Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med, 1997. 126: 497.

576.von Unruh, G.E., et al. Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004. 15: 1567.

577.Harris, S.S., et al. Effects of Hydration and Calcium Supplementation on Urine Calcium Concentration in Healthy Postmenopausal Women. J Am Coll Nutr, 2015. 34: 340.

578.Coe F.M., et al. Hyperuricosuric calcium stone disease, In: Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, F.M. Coe FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM, Editor. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

579.Coe, F.L. Hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1980. 128: 439.

580.Siener, R., et al. The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res, 2004. 12: 106.

581.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens, 1998. 11: 46.

582.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998. 32: 802.

583.Pearle, M.S., et al., Medical management of urolithiasis. In: 2ND International Consultation on Stone Disease, ed. K.S. Denstedt J. 2008.

584.Barcelo, P., et al. Randomized double-blind study of potassium citrate in idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 150: 1761.

585.Hofbauer, J., et al. Alkali citrate prophylaxis in idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate urolithiasis--a prospective randomized study. Br J Urol, 1994. 73: 362.

586.Ettinger, B., et al. Potassium-magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1997. 158: 2069.

587.Lojanapiwat, B., et al. Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 611.

588.Phillips, R., et al. Citrate salts for preventing and treating calcium containing kidney stones in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015: CD010057.

589.Favus, M.J., et al. The effects of allopurinol treatment on stone formation on hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate stone-formers. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 1980. 53: 265.

590.Ettinger, B., et al. Randomized trial of allopurinol in the prevention of calcium oxalate calculi. N Engl J Med, 1986. 315: 1386.

591.Smith, M.J. Placebo versus allopurinol for renal calculi. J Urol, 1977. 117: 690.

592.Pearle, M.S., et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials for medical prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 679.

593.Cohen, T.D., et al. Clinical effect of captopril on the formation and growth of cystine calculi. J Urol, 1995. 154: 164.

594.Coulthard, M.G., et al. The treatment of cystinuria with captopril. Am J Kidney Dis, 1995. 25: 661.

595.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of febuxostat versus allopurinol or placebo in individuals with higher urinary uric acid excretion and calcium stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1960.

596.Nouvenne, A., et al. New pharmacologic approach to patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis and high uricosuria: Febuxostat vs allopurinol. A pilot study. Eur J Intern Med, 2013. 24: e64.

597.Jarrar, K., Boedeker, R. H. and Weidner, W. Struvite stones: long term follow up under metaphylaxis. Ann Urol (Paris), 1996. 30: 112.

598.Ettinger, B., et al. Chlorthalidone reduces calcium oxalate calculous recurrence but magnesium hydroxide does not. J Urol, 1988. 139: 679.

599.Prien, E.L., Sr., et al. Magnesium oxide-pyridoxine therapy for recurrent calcium oxalate calculi.
J Urol, 1974. 112: 509.

600.Pinheiro, V.B., et al. The effect of sodium bicarbonate upon urinary citrate excretion in calcium stone formers. Urology, 2013. 82: 33.

601.Hoppe, B., et al. The primary hyperoxalurias. Kidney Int, 2009. 75: 1264.

602.Borghi, L., et al. Randomized prospective study of a nonthiazide diuretic, indapamide, in preventing calcium stone recurrences. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 1993. 22 Suppl 6: S78.

603.Brocks, P., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium stones? Lancet, 1981. 2: 124.

604.Mortensen, J.T., et al. Thiazides in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent idiopathic kidney stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1986. 18: 265.

605.Laerum, E., et al. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis. A double-blind study in general practice. Acta Med Scand, 1984. 215: 383.

606.Ohkawa, M., et al. Thiazide treatment for calcium urolithiasis in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Br J Urol, 1992. 69: 571.

607.Scholz, D., et al. Double-blind study with thiazide in recurrent calcium lithiasis. J Urol, 1982. 128: 903.

608.Nicar, M.J., et al. Use of potassium citrate as potassium supplement during thiazide therapy of calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1984. 131: 430.

609.Fernandez-Rodriguez, A., et al. [The role of thiazides in the prophylaxis of recurrent calcium lithiasis]. Actas Urol Esp, 2006. 30: 305.

610.Dolin, D.J., et al. Effect of cystine-binding thiol drugs on urinary cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. J Endourol, 2005. 19: 429.

611.Chow, G.K., et al. Medical treatment of cystinuria: results of contemporary clinical practice. J Urol, 1996. 156: 1576.

612.Pak, C.Y., et al. Management of cystine nephrolithiasis with alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine. J Urol, 1986. 136: 1003.

613.Tekin, A., et al. Cystine calculi in children: the results of a metabolic evaluation and response to medical therapy. J Urol, 2001. 165: 2328.

614.Pedersen, S.A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer: A nationwide case-control study from Denmark. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018. 78: 673.

615.Pottegård, A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use is strongly associated with risk of lip cancer. J Intern Med, 2017. 282: 322.

616.Worcester, E.M., et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of idiopathic hypercalciuria. Semin Nephrol, 2008. 28: 120.

617.Curhan, G.C., et al. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med, 1993. 328: 833.

618.Wolf, H., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium oxalate stones? Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, 1983. 20: 477.

619.Johansson, G., et al. Effects of magnesium hydroxide in renal stone disease. J Am Coll Nutr, 1982. 1: 179.

620.Khan, S.R., et al. Magnesium oxide administration and prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 149: 412.

621.Hesse, A., et al. Causes of phosphate stone formation and the importance of metaphylaxis by urinary acidification: a review. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 308.

622.Silverberg, S.J., et al. A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med, 1999. 341: 1249.

623.Mollerup, C.L., et al. Risk of renal stone events in primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroid surgery: controlled retrospective follow up study. BMJ, 2002. 325: 807.

624.Evan, A.E., et al. Histopathology and surgical anatomy of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and calcium phosphate stones. Kidney Int, 2008. 74: 223.

625.Rizzato, G., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a presenting feature of chronic sarcoidosis: a prospective study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 1996. 13: 167.

626.Garrelfs, S.F., et al. Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1. N Engl
J Med, 2021. 384: 1216.

627.Takei, K., et al. Oral calcium supplement decreases urinary oxalate excretion in patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urol Int, 1998. 61: 192.

628.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with secondary hyperoxaluria. Front Biosci, 2003. 8: e437.

629.Prezioso, D., et al. Dietary treatment of urinary risk factors for renal stone formation. A review of CLU Working Group. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2015. 87: 105.

630.Domrongkitchaiporn, S., et al. Dosage of potassium citrate in the correction of urinary abnormalities in pediatric distal renal tubular acidosis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002. 39: 383.

631.Maxwell A.P. Genetic renal abnormalities. Medicine, 2007. 35: 386.

632.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Furosemide/Fludrocortisone Test and Clinical Parameters to Diagnose Incomplete Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis in Kidney Stone Formers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017. 12: 1507.

633.Oliveira, B., et al. Genetic, pathophysiological, and clinical aspects of nephrocalcinosis. Am
J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2016. 311: F1243.

634.Gambaro, G., et al. Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement. J Nephrol, 2016. 29: 715.

635.Mandel, N.S., et al. Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J Urol, 1989. 142: 1516.

636.Cameron, M.A., et al. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 335.

637.Kim, S., et al. Development of Nephrolithiasis in Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis, 2017. 70: 173.

638.Millman, S., et al. Pathogenesis and clinical course of mixed calcium oxalate and uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int, 1982. 22: 366.

639.Pak, C.Y., et al. Biochemical distinction between hyperuricosuric calcium urolithiasis and gouty diathesis. Urology, 2002. 60: 789.

640.Chou, Y.H., et al. Clinical study of ammonium acid urate urolithiasis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012.
28: 259.

641.Wagner, C.A., et al. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol, 2010. 23 Suppl 16: S165.

642.Miano, R., et al. Stones and urinary tract infections. Urol Int, 2007. 79 Suppl 1: 32.

643.Rodman J.S., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of uric acid calculi., In: Kidney Stones. Medical and Surgical Management, F.M. Coe FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM., Editor. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

644.Low, R.K., et al. Uric acid-related nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am, 1997. 24: 135.

645.Shekarriz, B., et al. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: current concepts and controversies. J Urol, 2002.
168: 1307.

646.Wilcox, W.R., et al. Solubility of uric acid and monosodium urate. Med Biol Eng, 1972. 10: 522.

647.Mattle, D., et al. Preventive treatment of nephrolithiasis with alkali citrate--a critical review. Urol Res, 2005. 33: 73.

648.Marchini, G.S., et al. Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1334.

649.Kramer, G., et al. Role of bacteria in the development of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 35.

650.Gettman, M.T., et al. Struvite stones: diagnosis and current treatment concepts. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 653.

651.Bichler, K.H., et al. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2002. 19: 488.

652.Carpentier, X., et al. Relationships between carbonation rate of carbapatite and morphologic characteristics of calcium phosphate stones and etiology. Urology, 2009. 73: 968.

653.Thompson, R.B., et al. Bacteriology of infected stones. Urology, 1973. 2: 627.

654.McLean, R.J., et al. The ecology and pathogenicity of urease-producing bacteria in the urinary tract. Crit Rev Microbiol, 1988. 16: 37.

655.Wong H.Y., et al. Medical management and prevention of struvite stones, in Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, Coe F.M., Pak C.Y.C., Parks J.H., Preminger G.M., Editors. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

656.Wall, I., et al. Long-term acidification of urine in patients treated for infected renal stones. Urol Int, 1990. 45: 336.

657.Griffith, D.P., et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of Lithostat (acetohydroxamic acid) in the palliative treatment of infection-induced urinary calculi. Eur Urol, 1991. 20: 243.

658.Williams, J.J., et al. A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 1984. 311: 760.

659.Milliner, D.S., et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc, 1993. 68: 241.

660.Prot-Bertoye, C., et al. CKD and Its Risk Factors among Patients with Cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : CJASN, 2015. 10: 842.

661.Kum, F., et al. Hypertension and renal impairment in patients with cystinuria: findings from a specialist cystinuria centre. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 357.

662.Rogers, A., et al. Management of cystinuria. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 347.

663.Dello Strologo, L., et al. Comparison between SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 cystinuria patients and carriers: a need for a new classification. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002. 13: 2547.

664.Lee, W.S., et al. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human kidney cDNA involved in cystine, dibasic, and neutral amino acid transport. J Clin Invest, 1993. 91: 1959.

665.Knoll, T., et al. Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol, 2005. 20: 19.

666.Finocchiaro, R., et al. Usefulness of cyanide-nitroprusside test in detecting incomplete recessive heterozygotes for cystinuria: a standardized dilution procedure. Urol Res, 1998. 26: 401.

667.Nakagawa, Y., et al. Clinical use of cystine supersaturation measurements. J Urol, 2000. 164: 1481.

668.Fjellstedt, E., et al. Cystine analyses of separate day and night urine as a basis for the management of patients with homozygous cystinuria. Urol Res, 2001. 29: 303.

669.Ng, C.S., et al. Contemporary management of cystinuria. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 647.

670.Biyani, C.S., et al. Cystinuria—diagnosis and management. EAU-EBU Update Series 2006. 4: 175.

671.Runolfsdottir, H.L., et al. Urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, carriers and healthy control subjects. Mol Genet Metab, 2019. 128: 144.

672.Edvardsson, V.O., et al. Comparison of the effect of allopurinol and febuxostat on urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency (APRTd): A clinical trial. Eur J Intern Med, 2018. 48: 75.

673.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Drug-induced urinary calculi. Rev Urol, 2003. 5: 227.

674.Beltrami, P., et al. The endourological treatment of renal matrix stones. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 394.

675.Nakagawa, Y., et al. A modified cyanide-nitroprusside method for quantifying urinary cystine concentration that corrects for creatinine interference. Clin Chim Acta, 1999. 289: 57.

676.Lombardo, R., et al. What are the benefits and harms of scheduled follow-up for patients who undergo definitive treatment of upper urinary tract stone disease? PROSPERO, 2020.

677.Schwartz, B.F., et al. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 333.

678.Kum, F., et al. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999-2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int, 2016. 118: 140.

679.Ramello, A., et al. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol, 2000. 13 Suppl 3: S45.

680.Halstead, S.B. Epidemiology of bladder stone of children: precipitating events. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 101.

681.Takasaki, E., et al. Chemical compositions of 300 lower urinary tract calculi and associated disorders in the urinary tract. Urol Int, 1995. 54: 89.

682.Naqvi, S.A., et al. Bladder stone disease in children: clinical studies. J Pak Med Assoc, 1984. 34: 94.

683.Philippou, P., et al. The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology. Urology, 2012. 79: 980.

684.Lal, B., et al. Childhood bladder stones-an endemic disease of developing countries. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2015. 27: 17.

685.Douenias, R., et al. Predisposing factors in bladder calculi: Review of 100 cases. Urology, 1991. 37: 240.

686.Smith, J.M., et al. Vesical stone: the clinical features of 652 cases. Irish Med J, 1975. 68: 85.

687.Millan-Rodriguez, F., et al. Urodynamic findings before and after noninvasive management of bladder calculi. BJU International, 2004. 93: 1267.

688.Yang, X., et al. The value of respective urodynamic parameters for evaluating the occurrence of complications linked to benign prostatic enlargement. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 1761.

689.Childs, M.A., et al. Pathogenesis of bladder calculi in the presence of urinary stasis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1347.

690.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1105.

691.Mebust, W.K., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. 1989. J Urol, 2002. 167: 999.

692.Chen, Y., et al. Bladder stone incidence in persons with spinal cord injury: Determinants and trends, 1973-1996. Urology, 2001. 58: 665.

693.Hall, M.K., et al. Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage. Urology, 1989. 34: 126.

694.DeVivo, M.J., et al. The risk of bladder calculi in patients with spinal cord injuries. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1985. 145: 428.

695.Kohler-Ockmore, J., et al. Long-term catheterization of the bladder: prevalence and morbidity.
Br J Urol, 1996. 77: 347.

696.Bansal, A., et al. Prospective randomized comparison of three endoscopic modalities used in treatment of bladder stones. Urologia, 2016. 83: 87.

697.Kawahara, T., et al. Correlation between the operation time using two different power settings of a Ho: YAG laser: laser power doesn’t influence lithotripsy time. BMC Res Notes, 2013. 6: 80.

698.Liu, G., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy: An effective treatment for bladder stones with urethral strictures. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2016. 9: 19907.

699.Soliman, N.A., et al. Endemic bladder calculi in children. Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 1489.

700.Aurora, A.L., et al. Bladder stone disease of childhood. II. A clinico-pathological study. Acta Paediatr Scand, 1970. 59: 385.

701.Valyasevi, A., et al. Studies of bladder stone disease in Thailand. VI. Urinary studies in children, 2-10 years old, resident in a hypo- and hyperendemic area. Am J Clin Nutr, 1967. 20: 1362.

702.Al-Marhoon, M.S., et al. Comparison of Endourological and Open Cystolithotomy in the Management of Bladder Stones in Children. J Urol, 2009. 181: 2684.

703.Linsenmeyer, M.A., et al. Accuracy of bladder stone detection using abdominal x-ray after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med , 2004. 27: 438.

704.Bakin, S., et al. Accuracy of ultrasound versus computed tomography urogram in detecting urinary tract calculi. Med J Malaysia, 2015. 70: 238.

705.Ahmed, F.O., et al. A comparison between transabdominal ultrasonographic and cystourethroscopy findings in adult Sudanese patients presenting with haematuria. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 47: 223.

706.Babjuk, M., et al., EAU Guidelines on Non-musle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and CIS), in European Association of Urology Guidelines 2022 edition. 2022, The European Association of Urology: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

707.Johnson, E.K., et al. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Urology, 2011. 78: 662.

708.ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103, 2007. 37: 2.

709.O’Connor, R.C., et al. Nonsurgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with bladder calculi. Urology, 2002. 60: 288.

710.Lopez, J.R., et al. Irrigating solutions in bladder stone dissolution. Drug Intell Clin Pharm, 1987.
21: 872.

711.Rattan, K.N., et al. Catheterless and drainless open suprapubic cystolithotomy in children: A safe procedure. Pediatric Surgery International, 2006. 22: 255.

712.Ullah, S., et al. Comparison of open vesicolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy. Pak J Med Sci, 2007.
23: 47.

713.Singh, K.J., et al. Comparison of three different endoscopic techniques in management of bladder calculi. Indian J Urol, 2011. 27: 10.

714.Ozdemir A.T, et al. Randomized comparison of the transurethral use of nephroscope via amplatz sheath with cystoscope in transurethral cystolithotripsy of bladder stones in male patients.
J Endourol, 2012. 26: A142. [No abstract available].

715.Ener, K., et al. The randomized comparison of two different endoscopic techniques in the management of large bladder stones: Transurethral use of nephroscope or cystoscope? J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1151.

716.Wu, J.H., et al. Combined usage of Ho:YAG laser with monopolar resectoscope in the treatment of bladder stone and bladder outlet obstruction. Pak J Med Sci, 2014. 30: 908.

717.Halis, F., et al. The comparison of percutaneous and transurethral cystolithotripsy methods simultaneously performed with Transurethral Resection of Prostate in patients with BPH and bladder stone. Kuwait Med J, 2019. 51: 189.

718.Razvi, H.A., et al. Management of Vesical Calculi: Comparison of Lithotripsy Devices. J Endourol, 1996. 10: 559.

719.Ercil, H., et al. Comparison of Ho:Yag laser and pneumatic lithotripsy combined with transurethral prostatectomy in high burden bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg, 2016. 39: 238.

720.Javanmard, B., et al. Surgical Management of Vesical Stones in Children: A Comparison Between Open Cystolithotomy, Percutaneous Cystolithotomy and Transurethral Cystolithotripsy With Holmium-YAG Laser. J Lasers Med Sci, 2018. 9: 183.

721.Gangkak, G., et al. Pneumatic cystolithotripsy versus holmium:yag laser cystolithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones: a prospective randomized study. Pediatric Surgery International, 2016. 32: 609.

722.Ali, M., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic cystolitholapaxy in the management of patients presenting with calcular acute urinary retention: a randomised controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 879.

723.Deswanto, I.A., et al. Management of bladder stones: The move towards non-invasive treatment. Med J Indonesia, 2017. 26: 128.

724.Bhatia, V., et al. A comparative study of cystolithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1994. 26: 27.

725.Rizvi, S.A., et al. Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: experience with 1,440 children.
J Urol, 2003. 169: 634.

726.Autorino, R., et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol, 2015. 68: 86.

727.Matei, D.V., et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int, 2012. 110: E972.

728.Philippou, P., et al. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: Is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology, 2011. 78: 43.

729.Guo, R.Q., et al. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 144.

730.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in a High-Volume Center: The Impact of Concomitant Holmium Laser Cystolitholapaxy. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 564.

731.Tangpaitoon, T., et al. Does Cystolitholapaxy at the Time of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Affect Outcomes? Urology, 2017. 99: 192.

732.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Critical analysis of a multicentric experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes and complications of 10 years of routine clinical practice. BJU Int, 2020. 126: 177.

733.Ord, J., et al. Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol, 2003. 170: 1734.

734.Bartel, P., et al. Bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term study. Spinal Cord, 2014. 52: 295.

735.Chen, H., et al. Can bladder irrigation reduce the morbidity of bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury? Open J Urol, 2015. 5: 42.

736.Awad, S.A., et al. Long-term results and complications of augmentation ileocystoplasty for idiopathic urge incontinence in women. British J Urol, 1998. 81: 569.

737.Blyth, B., et al. Lithogenic properties of enterocystoplasty. J Urol, 1992. 148: 575.

738.Flood, H.D., et al. Long-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urology. Neurourol Urodyn, 1995. 14: 297.

739.Hayashi, Y., et al. Review of 86 Patients With Myelodysplasia and Neurogenic Bladder Who Underwent Sigmoidocolocystoplasty and Were Followed More Than 10 Years. J Urol, 2006.
176: 1806.

740.Husmann, D.A. Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: Bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol, 2016. 5: 3.

741.Nurse, D.E., et al. Stones in enterocystoplasties. British J Urol, 1996. 77: 684.

742.Shekarriz, B., et al. Surgical complications of bladder augmentation: Comparison between various enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology, 2000. 55: 123.

743.Welk, B., et al. Population based assessment of enterocystoplasty complications in adults. J Urol, 2012. 188: 464.

744.Zhang, H., et al. Bladder stone formation after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: Statistical analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr Surg, 2005. 40: 407.

745.Szymanski K.M., et al. Additional Surgeries after Bladder Augmentation in Patients with Spina Bifida in the 21st Century. J Urol, 2020. 203: 1207.

746.DeFoor, W., et al. Bladder calculi after augmentation cystoplasty: Risk factors and prevention strategies. J Urol, 2004. 172: 1964.

747.Hanna, M.K., et al. Challenges in salvaging urinary continence following failed bladder exstrophy repair in a developing country. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 270.

748.Inouye, B.M., et al. Urologic complications of major genitourinary reconstruction in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 680.

749.Lima, S.V.C., et al. Nonsecretory Intestinocystoplasty: A 15-Year Prospective Study of 183 Patients. J Urol, 2008. 179: 1113.

750.Metcalfe, P.D., et al. What is the Need for Additional Bladder Surgery After Bladder Augmentation in Childhood? J Urol, 2006. 176: 1801.

751.Novak, T.E., et al. Complications of Complex Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction in Patients With Neurogenic Versus Nonneurogenic Bladder-Is There a Difference? J Urol, 2008. 180: 2629.

752.Surer, I., et al. Continent urinary diversion and the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol, 2003.
169: 1102.

753.Palmer, L.S., et al. Urolithiasis in children following augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol, 1993. 150: 726.

754.Kronner, K.M., et al. Bladder calculi in the pediatric augmented bladder. J Urol, 1998. 160: 1096.

755.Silver, R.I., et al. Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. The J Urol, 1997. 158: 1322.

756.Ross, J.P.J., et al. Pediatric bladder augmentation - Panacea or Pandora’s box? Can Urol Assoc J, 2020. 14: E251.

757.Kaefer, M., et al. Reservoir calculi: a comparison of reservoirs constructed from stomach and other enteric segments. The J Urol, 1998. 160: 2187.

758.Wang, K., et al. Complications after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: Review of 100 cases at one institution. J Pediatr Surg, 1999. 34: 1672.

759.Wagstaff, K.E., et al. Blood and urine analysis in patients with intestinal bladders. British J Urol, 1991. 68: 311.

760.Breda, A., et al. Percutaneous Cystolithotomy for Calculi in Reconstructed Bladders: Initial UCLA Experience. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1989.

761.Kisku, S., et al. Bladder calculi in the augmented bladder: A follow-up study of 160 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 66.

762.Szymanski, K.M., et al. Cutting for stone in augmented bladders - What is the risk of recurrence and is it impacted by treatment modality? J Urol, 2014. 191: 1375.

763.Schlomer, B.J., et al. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 1043.

764.Turk, T.M., et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduit or continent urinary diversion. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 305.

765.Knap, M.M., et al. Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scandinavian J Urol and Nephrology, 2004. 38: 153.

766.Arai, Y., et al. Orthotopic ileal neobladder in male patients: Functional outcomes of 66 cases. Int
J Urol, 1999. 6: 388.

767.Badawy, A.A., et al. Orthotopic diversion after cystectomy in women: A single-centre experience with a 10-year follow-up. Arab J Urol, 2011. 9: 267.

768.Ji, H., et al. Identification and management of emptying failure in male patients with orthotopic neobladders after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology, 2010. 76: 644.

769.Madbouly, K. Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery. Urol Ann, 2010. 2: 96.

770.Miyake, H., et al. Experience with various types of orthotopic neobladder in Japanese men: Long-term follow-up. Urol Int, 2010. 84: 34.

771.Moeen, A.M., et al. Management of neobladder complications: endoscopy comes first. Scandinavian J Urol, 2017. 51: 146.

772.Simon, J., et al. Neobladder emptying failure in males: incidence, etiology and therapeutic options.
J Urol, 2006. 176: 1468.

773.Stein, J.P., et al. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: Experience with 209 patients. J Urol, 2004. 172: 584.

774.Miyake, H., et al. Orthotopic sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: Assessment of complications, functional outcomes and quality of life in 82 Japanese patients. BJU International, 2010. 106: 412.

775.Khalil, F., et al. Long-term follow-up after ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz
i pouch): A retrospective study of a monocentric experience. Arab J Urol, 2015. 13: 245.

776.Marien, T., et al. Characterization of Urolithiasis in Patients Following Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction with Intestinal Segments. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 217.

777.Davis, W.B., et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided access for the treatment of calculi in continent urinary reservoirs. CardioVasc Intervent Radiol, 2002. 25: 119.

778.Paez, E., et al. Percutaneous treatment of calculi in reconstructed bladder. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 334.

779.La Vecchia, C., et al. Genital and urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer. Cancer Res, 1991. 51: 629.

780.Chung, S.-D., et al. A case-control study on the association between bladder cancer and prior bladder calculus. BMC cancer, 2013. 13: 117.

781.Jhamb, M., et al. Urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Contr, 2007. 18: 839.