1.Skolarikos, A., et al. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 750.

2.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 468.

3.Turk, C., et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 475.

4.Phillips, B., et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Updated by Jeremy Howick March 2009. 2009.

5.Guyatt, G.H., et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008. 336: 1049.

6.Sorokin, I., et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 1301.

7.Monga, M., et al. Prevalence of Stone Disease and Procedure Trends in the United States. Urology, 2023. 176: 63.

8.Stamatelou, K.K., et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1817.

9.Hesse, A., et al. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol, 2003. 44: 709.

10.Zhe, M., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a risk factor of chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies with 4,770,691 participants. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 441.

11.Corrales, M., et al. Classification of Stones According to Michel Daudon: A Narrative Review. Eur Urol Focus, 2021. 7: 13.

12.Halbritter, J. Genetics of kidney stone disease-Polygenic meets monogenic. Nephrol Ther, 2021. 17S: S88.

13.Leusmann, D.B. Whewellite, weddellite and company: where do all the strange names originate? BJU Int, 2000. 86: 411.

14.Strohmaier, W.L. Course of calcium stone disease without treatment. What can we expect? Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 339.

15.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Risk of recurrence of idiopathic calcium kidney stones: analysis of data from the literature. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 227.

16.Keoghane, S., et al. The natural history of untreated renal tract calculi. BJU Int, 2010. 105: 1627.

17.Straub, M., et al. Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol, 2005. 23: 309.

18.Pawar, A.S., et al. Incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients with horseshoe kidney: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann, 2018. 10: 87.

19.Dissayabutra, T., et al. Urinary stone risk factors in the descendants of patients with kidney stone disease. Pediatr Nephrol, 2018. 33: 1173.

20.Hu, H., et al. Association between Circulating Vitamin D Level and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 2017. 9.

21.Geraghty, R.M., et al. Worldwide Impact of Warmer Seasons on the Incidence of Renal Colic and Kidney Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review of Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 729.

22.Guo, Z.L., et al. Association between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018. 97: e9460.

23.Hesse, A.T., Tiselius H-G,. Siener R., et al. (Eds.), Urinary Stones, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence. 3rd edition. . 2009, Basel.

24.Basiri, A., et al. Familial relations and recurrence pattern in nephrolithiasis: new words about old subjects. Urol J, 2010. 7: 81.

25.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int, 2005. 67: 1053.

26.Asplin, J.R., et al. Hyperoxaluria in kidney stone formers treated with modern bariatric surgery. J Urol, 2007. 177: 565.

27.Gonzalez, R.D., et al. Kidney stone risk following modern bariatric surgery. Curr Urol Rep, 2014. 15: 401.

28.Rendina, D., et al. Metabolic syndrome and nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence. J Nephrol, 2014. 27: 371.

29.Dell’Orto, V.G., et al. Metabolic disturbances and renal stone promotion on treatment with topiramate: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2014. 77: 958.

30.Mufti, U.B., et al. Nephrolithiasis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1557.

31.Chen, Y., et al. Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Spinal Cord, 2000. 38: 346.

32.Hara, A., et al. Incidence of nephrolithiasis in relation to environmental exposure to lead and cadmium in a population study. Environ Res, 2016. 145: 1.

33.Gambaro, G., et al. The Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Urolithiasis and its Urological Treatments: A Review. J Urol, 2017. 198: 268.

34.Lucato, P., et al. Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int, 2016. 27: 3155.

35.Kim, S.C., et al. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2007. 35: 319.

36.McGrath, T.A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2020. 30: 2791.

37.Dahm, P., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical signs, symptoms, and imaging findings in patients with suspected renal colic. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2022. 3: e12831.

38.Ray, A.A., et al. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology, 2010. 76: 295.

39.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371: 1100.

40.Heidenreich, A., et al. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol, 2002. 41: 351.

41.Kennish, S.J., et al. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clin Radiol, 2008. 63: 1131.

42.Worster, A., et al. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med, 2002. 40: 280.

43.Yamashita, S., et al. Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases. Biomed Res Int, 2018. 2018: 9253952.

44.Wu, D.S., et al. Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 557.

45.Wiesenthal, J.D., et al. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Urol Res, 2010. 38: 307.

46.Kluner, C., et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006. 30: 44.

47.Caoili, E.M., et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology, 2002. 222: 353.

48.Van Der Molen, A.J., et al. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol, 2008. 18: 4.

49.Thomson, J.M., et al. Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose. Australas Radiol, 2001. 45: 291.

50.Smith-Bindman, R., et al. Computed Tomography Radiation Dose in Patients With Suspected Urolithiasis. JAMA Intern Med, 2015. 175: 1413.

51.Rodger, F., et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2018. 100: 375.

52.Saikiran, P. Effectiveness of Low Dose Over Standard dose CT for Detection of Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 2020. 14: 4447.

53.Moore, C.L., et al. Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. J Urol, 2019. 202: 475.

54.Poletti, P.A., et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 927.

55.Xiang, H., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2017. 61: 582.

56.Mandel, N., et al. Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J Urol, 2003. 169: 2026.

57.Kourambas, J., et al. Role of stone analysis in metabolic evaluation and medical treatment of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 181.

58.Hesse, A., et al. Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001). Clin Chem Lab Med, 2005. 43: 298.

59.Abdel-Halim, R.E., et al. A review of urinary stone analysis techniques. Saudi Med J, 2006. 27: 1462.

60.Gilad, R., et al. Interpreting the results of chemical stone analysis in the era of modern stone analysis techniques. J Nephrol, 2017. 30: 135.

61.Thiruchelvam, N., et al. Planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy using multidetector computed tomography urography, multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reformatting. BJU Int, 2005. 95: 1280.

62.Bonkat, G., et al., EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 39th EAU Annual Meeting, Paris, E.A.o.U.G. Office, Editor. 2022, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

63.Williams, J.C., Jr., et al. Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference. Urolithiasis, 2021. 49: 1.

64.Somani, B.K., et al. Review on diagnosis and management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: an ESUT practical guide for urologists. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 1637.

65.Asrat, T., et al. Ultrasonographic detection of ureteral jets in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998. 178: 1194.

66.Swartz, M.A., et al. Admission for nephrolithiasis in pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 109: 1099.

67.Patel, S.J., et al. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics, 2007. 27: 1705.

68.Juan, Y.S., et al. Management of symptomatic urolithiasis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2007. 23: 241.

69.Opinion, C. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation: Correction. Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 132: 786.

70.Masselli, G., et al. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging, 2014. 5: 691.

71.(MHRA), M.a.H.p.R.A., Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment in Clinical Use, MHRA, Editor. 2015, MHRA.

72.committee, T.A.C.o.O.a.G.A.W.s.h.c.p. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 130: e210.

73.Practice, A.I.o.U.i.M., AIUM Practice parameter for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations 2013, A.P.P.f.t.P.o.O.U. Examinations, Editor. 2013, AIUM.

74.Administration, U.S.F.D. Avoid Fetal “Keepsake” Images, Heartbeat Monitors. 2014. 2018.

75.Sharp, C., et al., Diagnostic Medical Exposures: Advice on Exposure to Ionising Radiation during Pregnancy. 1998, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0RQ.

76.Kanal, E., et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 188: 1447.

77.Roy, C., et al. Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography. Eur Radiol, 1996. 6: 334.

78.White, W.M., et al. Predictive value of current imaging modalities for the detection of urolithiasis during pregnancy: a multicenter, longitudinal study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 931.

79.Sternberg, K., et al. Pediatric stone disease: an evolving experience. J Urol, 2005. 174: 1711.

80.Bernardor, J., et al. Pediatric urolithiasis: what can pediatricians expect from radiologists? Pediatr Radiol, 2023. 53: 695.

81.Authors on behalf of, I., et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP, 2012. 41: 1.

82.Protection, I.C.o.R. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, 2007. 37.

83.Passerotti, C., et al. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol, 2009. 182: 1829.

84.Tasian, G.E., et al. Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones in children. J Urol, 2014. 192: 1329.

85.Palmer, L.S. Pediatric urologic imaging. Urol Clin North Am, 2006. 33: 409.

86.Darge, K., et al. [Modern ultrasound technologies and their application in pediatric urinary tract imaging]. Radiologe, 2005. 45: 1101.

87.Pepe, P., et al. Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol, 2005. 53: 131.

88.Morrison, J.C., et al. Use of Ultrasound in Pediatric Renal Stone Diagnosis and Surgery. Curr Urol Rep, 2017. 18: 22.

89.Stratton, K.L., et al. Implications of ionizing radiation in the pediatric urology patient. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2137.

90.Grivas, N., et al. Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel. J Pediatr Urol, 2020. 16: 612.

91.Niemann, T., et al. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008. 191: 396.

92.Rob, S., et al. Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol, 2017. 72: 11.

93.Leppert, A., et al. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced? J Pediatr Surg, 2002. 37: 1441.

94.Pathan, S.A., et al. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016. 387: 1999.

95.Pathan, S.A., et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic. Eur Urol, 2018. 73: 583.

96.Forouzanfar, M.M., et al. Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen with Intravenous Ketorolac in Renal Colic Pain Management; A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med, 2019. 9: e86963.

97.Gu, H.Y., et al. Increasing Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Reducing Opioids or Paracetamol in the Management of Acute Renal Colic: Based on Three-Stage Study Design of Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol, 2019. 10: 96.

98.Schmidt, M., et al. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ, 2018. 362: k3426.

99.Coxib, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet, 2013. 382: 769.

100.Moussa, M., et al. Intradermal sterile water injection versus diclofenac sodium in acute renal colic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med, 2021. 44: 395.

101.Holdgate, A., et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005. 2004: CD004137.

102.Safaie, A., et al. Intravenous morphine plus ibuprofen or ketorolac versus intravenous morphine alone in reducing renal colic pain intensity in emergency department: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Turk J Emerg Med, 2022. 22: 8.

103.Beltaief, K., et al. Acupuncture versus titrated morphine in acute renal colic: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res, 2018. 11: 335.

104.Kaynar, M., et al. Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic. Am J Emerg Med, 2015. 33: 749.

105.Holdgate, A., et al. Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ, 2004. 328: 1401.

106.Seitz, C., et al. Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol, 2009. 56: 455.

107.Lee, A., et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007. 2007: CD002765.

108.Hollingsworth, J.M., et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2016. 355: i6112.

109.Guercio, S., et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol, 2011. 25: 1137.

110.Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D.E., et al. Emergent urinary decompression in acute stone-related urinary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2021. 16: 19.

111.Zul Khairul Azwadi, I., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 2021. 11: 6613.

112.Weltings, S., et al. Lessons from Literature: Nephrostomy Versus Double J Ureteral Catheterization in Patients with Obstructive Urolithiasis-Which Method Is Superior? J Endourol, 2019. 33: 777.

113.Wang, C.J., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 415.

114.Bonkat, G., et al. Management of Urosepsis in 2018. Eur Urol Focus, 2019. 5: 5.

115.Evans, L., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med, 2021. 47: 1181.

116.Pietropaolo, A., et al. Outcomes of Elective Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones in Patients with Prior Urosepsis and Emergency Drainage: Prospective Study over 5 yr from a Tertiary Endourology Centre. Eur Urol Focus, 2020. 6: 151.

117.Dellabella, M., et al. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2005. 174: 167.

118.Borghi, L., et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol, 1994. 152: 1095.

119.Porpiglia, F., et al. Effectiveness of nifedipine and deflazacort in the management of distal ureter stones. Urology, 2000. 56: 579.

120.Dellabella, M., et al. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology, 2005. 66: 712.

121.Yilmaz, E., et al. The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alpha1-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2010.

122.Liu, X.J., et al. Role of silodosin as medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 211.

123.Hsu, Y.P., et al. Silodosin versus tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2018. 13: e0203035.

124.Pickard, R., et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2015. 386: 341.

125.Furyk, J.S., et al. Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Ann Emerg Med, 2016. 67: 86.

126.Sur, R.L., et al. Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 959.

127.Turk, C., et al. Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureterolithiasis: The EAU Recommendations in 2016. Eur Urol, 2017. 71: 504.

128.Ye, Z., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones with Renal Colic: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Eur Urol, 2018. 73: 385.

129.Bai, Y., et al. Tadalafil Facilitates the Distal Ureteral Stone Expulsion: A Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 557.

130.Porpiglia, F., et al. Corticosteroids and tamsulosin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureter stones: single drug or association? Eur Urol, 2006. 50: 339.

131.Kachrilas, S., et al. The current role of percutaneous chemolysis in the management of urolithiasis: review and results. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 323.

132.Ong, A., et al. Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2023. 24: 355.

133.El-Gamal, O., et al. Role of combined use of potassium citrate and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 219.

134.Elbaset, M.A., et al. Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 207.

135.Musa, A.A. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2008. 40: 19.

136.Shen, P., et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1328.

137.Wang, H., et al. Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0167670.

138.Ghoneim, I.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology, 2010. 75: 45.

139.Platonov, M.A., et al. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: evidence-based guidelines for the modern era. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 243.

140.Li, W.M., et al. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int, 2007. 79: 124.

141.Yilmaz, E., et al. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urology, 2005. 66: 1160.

142.Pace, K.T., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol, 2005. 174: 595.

143.Madbouly, K., et al. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 127.

144.Semins, M.J., et al. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2008. 179: 194.

145.Li, K., et al. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1260.

146.Nguyen, D.P., et al. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 418.

147.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 537.

148.Kang, D.H., et al. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2016. 11: e0158661.

149.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy versus slow power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in stones with high attenuation value: A randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2020. 27: 165.

150.Connors, B.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int, 2009. 104: 1004.

151.Moon, K.B., et al. Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Urol, 2012. 53: 790.

152.Ng, C.F., et al. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute. J Urol, 2012. 188: 837.

153.Al-Dessoukey, A.A., et al. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones: A randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 33.

154.Lopez-Acon, J.D., et al. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Increasing the Energy Dose Applied Per Session by Increasing the Number of Shock Waves in Extracorporeal Lithotripsy: A Prospective and Comparative Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1289.

155.Connors, B.A., et al. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int, 2009. 103: 104.

156.Handa, R.K., et al. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int, 2012. 110: E1041.

157.Skuginna, V., et al. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol, 2016. 69: 267.

158.Maloney, M.E., et al. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution. J Endourol, 2006. 20: 603.

159.Demirci, D., et al. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 1407.

160.Honey, R.J., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology, 2010. 75: 38.

161.Ng, C.F., et al. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Urol, 2019. 202: 986.

162.Abdelbary, A.M., et al. Value of early second session shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of upper ureteric stones compared to laser ureteroscopy. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3089.

163.Pishchalnikov, Y.A., et al. Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol, 2006. 176: 2706.

164.Tailly, G.G., et al. Optical coupling control: an important step toward better shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1368.

165.Jain, A., et al. Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1680.

166.Van Besien, J., et al. Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study. Biomed Res Int, 2017. 2017: 7802672.

167.Eichel, L., et al. Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-generation lithotripters. J Endourol, 2001. 15: 671.

168.Sorensen, C., et al. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol, 2002. 168: 35.

169.Cleveland, R.O., et al. Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol, 2004. 18: 629.

170.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2017. 43: 394.

171.Honey, R.J., et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 2112.

172.Lu, Y., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for shock wave lithotripsy in patients with sterile urine before treatment may be unnecessary: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2012. 188: 441.

173.Oestreich, M.C., et al. Alpha-blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020. 11: CD013393.

174.Yuan, C., et al. Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 712.

175.Tzelves, L., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Complications According to Modified Clavien-Dindo Grading System. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis in a Sample of 115 Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1452.

176.Preminger, G.M., et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol, 2007. 52: 1610.

177.Lingeman, J.E., et al. Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis. JAMA, 1990. 263: 1789.

178.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol, 2006. 175: 1742.

179.Eassa, W.A., et al. Prospective study of the long-term effects of shock wave lithotripsy on renal function and blood pressure. J Urol, 2008. 179: 964.

180.Yu, C., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 719.

181.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Long-term Adverse Effects of Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: A Systematic Review. Urology, 2015. 85: 991.

182.Fankhauser, C.D., et al. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes after exposure to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi: a retrospective non-randomized data analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2018. 50: 1227.

183.Ather, M.H., et al. Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications? Urol Int, 2009. 83: 222.

184.Madbouly, K., et al. Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1239.

185.Sayed, M.A., et al. Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int, 2001. 88: 675.

186.Skolarikos, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention. Eur Urol, 2006. 50: 981.

187.Osman, M.M., et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 2005. 47: 860.

188.Tan, Y.M., et al. Clinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospital. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2002. 36: 363.

189.Muller-Mattheis, V.G., et al. Bacteremia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi. J Urol, 1991. 146: 733.

190.Maker, V., et al. Gastrointestinal injury secondary to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a review of the literature since its inception. J Am Coll Surg, 2004. 198: 128.

191.Chen, C.S., et al. Subcapsular hematoma of spleen--a complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculus. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi, 1992. 15: 215.

192.Kim, T.B., et al. Life-threatening complication after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a renal stone: a hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Korean J Urol, 2010. 51: 212.

193.Ng, C.F., et al. Hepatic haematoma after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 785.

194.Wendt-Nordahl, G., et al. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res, 2011. 39: 185.

195.Wang, Q., et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2017. 12: e0171478.

196.Wang, Y., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 50.

197.Deng, T., et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1687.

198.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1257.

199.Geraghty, R., et al. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep, 2015. 16: 54.

200.Binbay, M., et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1929.

201.Yaghoubian, A.J., et al. Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol, 2023. 209: 963.

202.Luo, Z., et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2020. 82: 36.

203.Schembri, M., et al. Outcomes of loco-regional anaesthesia in ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2020. 30: 726.

204.Omar, M., et al. Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 3075.

205.Wu, T., et al. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2017. 99: 308.

206.Agrawal, S., et al. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 3957.

207.Van Compernolle, D., et al. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1454.

208.Dragos, L.B., et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol, 2019. 8: S359.

209.Davis, N.F., et al. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 214.

210.Dickstein, R.J., et al. Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol, 2010. 24: 1589.

211.Eandi, J.A., et al. Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1653.

212.Ulvik, O., et al. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol, 2013. 27: 1197.

213.Peng, L., et al. Fluoroless versus conventional ureteroscopy for urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 299.

214.Subiela, J.D., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 417.

215.Ambani, S.N., et al. Ureteral stents for impassable ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2013. 27: 549.

216.Pace, K.T., et al. Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study. J Urol, 2017. 198: 130.

217.Ge, H., et al. Bilateral Same-Session Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1169.

218.Karim, S.S., et al. Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature. Urolithiasis, 2020. 48: 263.

219.Dragos, L.B., et al. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 630.

220.Lane, J., et al. Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 17.

221.Stern, J.M., et al. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 119.

222.L’Esperance J, O., et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology, 2005. 66: 252.

223.Traxer, O., et al. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol, 2013. 189: 580.

224.Traxer, O., et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015. 33: 2137.

225.Stern, K.L., et al. A Prospective Study Analyzing the Association Between High-grade Ureteral Access Sheath Injuries and the Formation of Ureteral Strictures. Urology, 2019. 128: 38.

226.Aykanat, C., et al. The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Size on Perioperative Parameters and Postoperative Ureteral Stricture in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 1013.

227.Lima, A., et al. Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1329.

228.Santiago, J.E., et al. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Curr Urol Rep, 2017. 18: 32.

229.Bach, T., et al. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter? J Endourol, 2008. 22: 1639.

230.Leijte, J.A., et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol, 2008. 22: 257.

231.Pierre, S., et al. Holmium laser for stone management. World J Urol, 2007. 25: 235.

232.Ventimiglia, E., et al. High- and Low-Power Laser Lithotripsy Achieves Similar Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Available Clinical Series. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1146.

233.Garcia Rojo, E., et al. Comparison of Low-Power vs High-Power Holmium Lasers in Pediatric Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Outcomes. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 509.

234.Sanchez-Puy, A., et al. New Generation Pulse Modulation in Holmium:YAG Lasers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med, 2022. 11.

235.Ibrahim, A., et al. Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2020. 34: 624.

236.Perri, D., et al. Treatment of ureteral stones with LithoEVO device and Vapor Tunnel tool. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2023. 75: 210.

237.Kronenberg, P., et al. Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2021. 31: 80.

238.Ulvik, O., et al. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol, 2022. 82: 73.

239.Haas, C.R., et al. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol, 2023. 209: 374.

240.Chua, M.E., et al. Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies. BJU Int, 2023. 131: 383.

241.Garg, S., et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study. Urol Int, 2009. 82: 341.

242.Binbay, M., et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 2011. 43: 989.

243.Ahmed, M., et al. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology, 2009. 73: 976.

244.John, T.T., et al. Adjunctive tamsulosin improves stone free rate after ureteroscopic lithotripsy of large renal and ureteric calculi: a prospective randomized study. Urology, 2010. 75: 1040.

245.Chen, H., et al. The Outcomes of Pre-Stenting on Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2022. 106: 495.

246.Law, Y.X.T., et al. Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 1377.

247.Allam, C.L., et al. The Role of Routine Ureteral Stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Treatment for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Trial. J Endourol, 2023. 37: 257.

248.Ehsanullah, S.A., et al. Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann, 2022. 14: 295.

249.Moon, T.D. Ureteral stenting--an obsolete procedure? J Urol, 2002. 167: 1984.

250.Jian, Z., et al. Combination of solifenacin and tamsulosin may provide additional beneficial effects for ureteral stent-related symptoms-outcomes from a network meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 289.

251.Cheng, C., et al. The Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Ureteral Navigation, Operation, and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2023. 107: 557.

252.Kim, J.K., et al. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 572.

253.Dasgupta, R., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. Eur Urol, 2021. 80: 46.

254.Perez Castro, E., et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol, 2014. 66: 102.

255.Bhojani, N., et al. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 991.

256.De Coninck, V., et al. Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 2147.

257.Bhanot, R., et al. Predictors and Strategies to Avoid Mortality Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Sections of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 598.

258.Dupuis, H., et al. Preoperative risk factors for complications after flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for stone disease: A French multicentric study. Prog Urol, 2022. 32: 593.

259.Chugh, S., et al. Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS). Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 16.

260.Tokas, T., et al. Role of Intrarenal Pressure in Modern Day Endourology (Mini-PCNL and Flexible URS): a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep, 2021. 22: 52.

261.Zeng, G., et al. Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol, 2021. 79: 114.

262.Ruhayel, Y., et al. Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol, 2017. 72: 220.

263.Tikkinen, K.A.O., et al., EAU Guidelines on Thromboprophylaxis in Urological Surgery, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 32nd EAU Annual Meeting, London, E.A.o.U.G. Office, Editor. 2017, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

264.Castellani, D., et al. The Impact of Lasers in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 151.

265.Abdullatif, V.A., et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Urol, 2022. 2022: 1716554.

266.Cracco, C.M., et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: S46.

267.Wen, J., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg, 2016. 28: 22.

268.Davis, N.F., et al. Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for Fluoroscopic and Fluoroscopy-free Endourological Procedures: A Systematic Review on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol Focus, 2023. 9: 938.

269.Yang, Y.H., et al. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 777.

270.Zhu, W., et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2017. 119: 612.

271.Isac, W., et al. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology, 2013. 81: 251.

272.Taguchi, K., et al. Ureteroscopy-assisted puncture for ultrasonography-guided renal access significantly improves overall treatment outcomes in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Int J Urol, 2021. 28: 913.

273.Srivastava, A., et al. A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 803.

274.Armas-Phan, M., et al. Ultrasound guidance can be used safely for renal tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int, 2020. 125: 284.

275.Wu, Y., et al. Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med, 2020. 19: 2661.

276.Mykoniatis, I., et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2022. 74: 409.

277.Deng, J., et al. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg, 2021. 110: 301.

278.Sharma, G., et al. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1376.

279.Tzelves, L., et al. Suction Use During Endourological Procedures. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 46.

280.Lu, Y., et al. Randomized prospective trial of tubeless versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1303.

281.Cormio, L., et al. Exit strategies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a comparison of surgical outcomes in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study. World J Urol, 2013. 31: 1239.

282.Chen, Z.J., et al. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg, 2020. 43: 60.

283.Lee, J.Y., et al. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol, 2017. 17: 48.

284.Garofalo, M., et al. Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis. Urolithiasis, 2013. 41: 347.

285.Jiang, H., et al. Improving Drainage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Based on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1131.

286.Seitz, C., et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol, 2012. 61: 146.

287.Liu, M., et al. Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures vs Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1467.

288.Yu, J., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1685.

289.Yoshida, S., et al. The significance of intraoperative renal pelvic urine and stone cultures for patients at a high risk of post-ureteroscopy systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 533.

290.Zhong, W., et al. Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol, 2008. 22: 2147.

291.Wu, C., et al. Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 36.

292.Croghan, S.M., et al. Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications. BJU Int, 2023. 131: 267.

293.Baccaglini, W., et al. Tranexamic Acid Use for Hemorrhagic Events Prevention in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 906.

294.Kallidonis, P., et al. Is There Any Clinical Benefit for Peri-operative Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep, 2021. 22: 65.

295.Lee, M.J., et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 303.

296.Wang, Z., et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between single-tract and multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of complex renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 731.

297.Winoker, J.S., et al. Opioid-Sparing Analgesic Effects of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 38.

298.Ma, Y., et al. Efficiency and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials. Urology, 2022. 168: 64.

299.Wang, J., et al. The Effect of Local Anesthetic Infiltration Around Nephrostomy Tract on Postoperative Pain Control after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int, 2016. 97: 125.

300.Zheng, C., et al. Efficiency and safety of quadratus lumborum block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Urolithiasis, 2022. 51: 12.

301.Mariappan, P., et al. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol, 2005. 173: 1610.

302.Deng, T., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int, 2018. 122: 29.

303.Chew, B.H., et al. A Single Dose of Intraoperative Antibiotics Is Sufficient to Prevent Urinary Tract Infection During Ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 63.

304.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stone therapy. Curr Opin Urol, 2019. 29: 89.

305.Gravas, S., et al. Postoperative infection rates in low risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a matched case control study. J Urol, 2012. 188: 843.

306.Danilovic, A., et al. One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2023. 49: 184.

307.Jung, H.D., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2022. 17: e0267233.

308.Sur, R.L., et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium. J Urol, 2021. 205: 1379.

309.Zhou, G., et al. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2022. 51: 17.

310.Klingler, H.C., et al. Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol, 2003. 43: 75.

311.Kefer, J.C., et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in patients on anticoagulant therapy. J Urol, 2009. 181: 144.

312.Baron, T.H., et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med, 2013. 368: 2113.

313.Naspro, R., et al. Antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stent undergoing urologic surgery: is it still no man’s land? Eur Urol, 2013. 64: 101.

314.Eberli, D., et al. Urological surgery and antiplatelet drugs after cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents. J Urol, 2010. 183: 2128.

315.Razvi, H., et al. Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis. J Endourol, 2012. 26: 1478.

316.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Incidence and risk factors of renal hematoma: a prospective study of 1,300 SWL treatments. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 247.

317.Schnabel, M.J., et al. Antiplatelet and anticoagulative medication during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2014. 28: 1034.

318.Aboumarzouk, O.M., et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 298.

319.Elkoushy, M.A., et al. Ureteroscopy in patients with coagulopathies is associated with lower stone-free rate and increased risk of clinically significant hematuria. Int Braz J Urol, 2012. 38: 195.

320.Sharaf, A., et al. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 1217.

321.Sahin, C., et al. Transient cessation of antiplatelet medication before percutaneous stone surgery: does it have any safety concern on bleeding related problems? Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 371.

322.Kuo, R.L., et al. Use of ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser in patients with bleeding diatheses. Urology, 1998. 52: 609.

323.Altay, B., et al. A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Lasers Med Sci, 2017. 32: 1615.

324.Gupta, A.D., et al. Coronary stent management in elective genitourinary surgery. BJU Int, 2012. 110: 480.

325.Delakas, D., et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol, 2003. 17: 201.

326.El-Nahas, A.R., et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol, 2007. 51: 1688.

327.Lee, J.Y., et al. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: 23988.

328.Ohmori, K., et al. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol, 1994. 151: 255.

329.Streem, S.B., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol, 1990. 144: 1347.

330.Carey, S.W., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with calcified ipsilateral renal arterial or abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Urol, 1992. 148: 18.

331.Reeves, T., et al. Role of Endourological Procedures (PCNL and URS) on Renal Function: a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep, 2020. 21: 21.

332.Mehra, K., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2022. 106: 461.

333.Shah, T.T., et al. Factors associated with spontaneous stone passage in a contemporary cohort of patients presenting with acute ureteric colic: results from the Multi-centre cohort study evaluating the role of Inflammatory Markers In patients presenting with acute ureteric Colic (MIMIC) study. BJU Int, 2019. 124: 504.

334.Skolarikos, A., et al. The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol, 2010. 24: 923.

335.Yallappa, S., et al. Natural History of Conservatively Managed Ureteral Stones: Analysis of 6600 Patients. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 371.

336.Skolarikos, A., et al. Indications, prediction of success and methods to improve outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2010. 82: 56.

337.Guler, Y. Non-contrast computed tomography-based factors in predicting ESWL success: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Urol, 2023. 33: 27.

338.Wang, W., et al. Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg, 2022. 9: 736641.

339.Drake, T., et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Eur Urol, 2017. 72: 772.

340.Wang, W., et al. Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol, 2021. 10: 2122.

341.Alsawi, M., et al. Primary versus delayed ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2022: 20514158221088687.

342.Peng, C.X., et al. Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. BMC Urol, 2023. 23: 56.

343.Lai, S., et al. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg, 2020. 80: 205.

344.Sorensen, M.D., et al. Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse. N Engl J Med, 2022. 387: 506.

345.Han, D.S., et al. The Durability of Active Surveillance in Patients with Asymptomatic Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 598.

346.Inci, K., et al. Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2189.

347.Lovegrove, C.E., et al. Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long-term follow-up: systematic review over 25 years. BJU Int, 2022. 129: 442.

348.Brandt, B., et al. Painful caliceal calculi. The treatment of small nonobstructing caliceal calculi in patients with symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1993. 27: 75.

349.Argyropoulos, A.N., et al. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol, 2010. 20: 154.

350.Srisubat, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014. 11: CD007044.

351.Sahinkanat, T., et al. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones. Urology, 2008. 71: 801.

352.Danuser, H., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol, 2007. 52: 539.

353.Dorantes-Carrillo, L.A., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 259.

354.Bosio, A., et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones </=2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus, 2022. 8: 1816.

355.Kallidonis, P., et al. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones </=20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021. 73: 711.

356.Preminger, G.M. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 108.

357.Zheng, C., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 549.

358.Pearle, M.S., et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol, 2005. 173: 2005.

359.Zheng, C., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 417.

360.Karakoyunlu, N., et al. A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 283.

361.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol, 2015. 67: 612.

362.Fayad, M.K., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis, 2022. 50: 113.

363.Kumar, A., et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol, 2015. 193: 160.

364.Zhang, W., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 745.

365.Junbo, L., et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J, 2019. 16: 97.

366.Tsai, S.H., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020. 99: e19403.

367.Zhang, H., et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi. Urol Int, 2019. 102: 153.

368.Kallidonis, P., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol, 2020. 204: 427.

369.Barone, B., et al. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 441.

370.Liu, M., et al. Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2023. 109: 1481.

371.Manikandan, R., et al. Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? Urology, 2007. 69: 620.

372.Torricelli, F.C.M., et al. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up. J Endourol, 2020. 34: 63.

373.Madbouly, K., et al. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol, 2001. 165: 1415.

374.Abdelhamid, M., et al. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 1227.

375.Gupta, N.P., et al. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2000. 163: 24.

376.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography. J Urol, 2015. 193: 2002.

377.Sumino, Y., et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2002. 168: 1344.

378.Liu, L.R., et al. Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013: CD008569.

379.Chiong, E., et al. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005. 65: 1070.

380.Chan, L.H., et al. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 510.

381.Sebaey, A., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Mini- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI-PCNL) for renal stones 20–30 mm a prospective randomized study. African Journal of Urology, 2022. 28: 13.

382.Assimos, D.G., et al. The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 1989. 142: 263.

383.Segura, J.W. Current surgical approaches to nephrolithiasis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 1990. 19: 919.

384.Honeck, P., et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1209.

385.Bichler, K.H., et al. Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi. Urol Int, 1997. 59: 102.

386.Paik, M.L., et al. Is there a role for open stone surgery? Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 323.

387.Alivizatos, G., et al. Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? Curr Opin Urol, 2006. 16: 106.

388.Wang, X., et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2013. 190: 888.

389.Soltani, M.H., et al. Stented Versus Stentless Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017. 27: 1269.

390.Mao, T., et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res, 2021. 49: 300060520983136.

391.Muller, P.F., et al. Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review. Arab J Urol, 2018. 16: 357.

392.Mantica, G., et al. The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2022. 74: 169.

393.Kumar, A., et al. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1248.

394.Torricelli, F.C., et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol, 2016. 42: 645.

395.Xiao, Y., et al. Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 1441.

396.Coptcoat, M.J., et al. The steinstrasse: a legacy of extracorporeal lithotripsy? Eur Urol, 1988. 14: 93.

397.Lucio, J., 2nd, et al. Steinstrasse predictive factors and outcomes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 477.

398.Moursy, E., et al. Tamsulosin as an expulsive therapy for steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010. 44: 315.

399.Resim, S., et al. Role of tamsulosin in treatment of patients with steinstrasse developing after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2005. 66: 945.

400.Rabbani, S.M. Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy. Urol J, 2008. 5: 89.

401.Lynch, M.F., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteric stent insertion for acute renal deobstruction: Consensus based guidance. British Journal of Medical & Surgical Urology, 2008. 1: 120.

402.Rebuck, D.A., et al. The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology, 2011. 77: 564.

403.Chew, B.H., et al. Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol, 2016. 195: 982.

404.Candau, C., et al. Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol, 2000. 37: 18.

405.Brain, E., et al. Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol, 2021. 206: 526.

406.Olvera-Posada, D., et al. Natural History of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of Factors Related to Clinical Events and Intervention. Urology, 2016. 97: 46.

407.Portis, A.J., et al. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology, 2008. 71: 218.

408.Tokas, T., et al. Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature. World J Urol, 2017. 35: 897.

409.Omar, M., et al. Contemporary Imaging Practice Patterns Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 1122.

410.Rippel, C.A., et al. Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol, 2012. 188: 2246.

411.Tzelves, L., et al. Duration of Follow-up and Timing of Discharge from Imaging Follow-up, in Adult Patients with Urolithiasis After Surgical or Medical Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Guideline Panel on Urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus, 2023. 9: 188.

412.Beck, E.M., et al. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol, 1991. 145: 6.

413.Zhou, Q., et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol, 2021. 34: 1569.

414.Salehi-Pourmehr, H., et al. Management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg, 2023. 112: 105.

415.Keenan, R.A., et al. Symptomatic Hydronephrosis and Ureteral Calculi in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review with a Proposed Management Protocol. J Endourol, 2022. 36: 1099.

416.McKnoulty, M., et al. Spontaneous renal fornix rupture in pregnancy and the post partum period: a systematic review of outcomes and management. BMC Urol, 2020. 20: 116.

417.Mokhmalji, H., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol, 2001. 165: 1088.

418.Tsai, Y.L., et al. Comparative study of conservative and surgical management for symptomatic moderate and severe hydronephrosis in pregnancy: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007. 86: 1047.

419.Dai, J.C., et al. Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two. Urology, 2021. 151: 44.

420.Mason, M.M., et al. A comparison of adverse pregnancy events between ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy: A propensity score-matched analysis of a large multi-institutional research network. World J Urol, 2023. 41: 1721.

421.Ishii, H., et al. Current status of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 1.

422.Teleb, M., et al. Definitive ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral calculi during pregnancy. Arab J Urol, 2014. 12: 299.

423.Johnson, E.B., et al. Obstetric complications of ureteroscopy during pregnancy. J Urol, 2012. 188: 151.

424.Ramachandra, M., et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) during pregnancy: A review of literature. Turk J Urol, 2020. 46: 89.

425.Holmes, D.G., et al. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology, 2002. 60: 603.

426.Yang, W.J., et al. Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer. Urology, 2006. 68: 324.

427.Assimos, D.G. Nephrolithiasis in patients with urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 69.

428.Cohen, T.D., et al. Long-term incidence and risks for recurrent stones following contemporary management of upper tract calculi in patients with a urinary diversion. J Urol, 1996. 155: 62.

429.El-Assmy, A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology, 2005. 66: 510.

430.Deliveliotis, C., et al. Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. J Endourol, 2002. 16: 717.

431.el-Nahas, A.R., et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology, 2006. 68: 500.

432.Ramachandra, M.N., et al. Challenges of Retrograde Ureteroscopy in Patients with Urinary Diversion: Outcomes and Lessons Learnt from a Systematic Review of Literature. Urol Int, 2018. 101: 249.

433.Stein, J.P., et al. Complications of the afferent antireflux valve mechanism in the Kock ileal reservoir. J Urol, 1996. 155: 1579.

434.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol, 2003. 170: 45.

435.Hensle, T.W., et al. Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU Int, 2004. 93: 585.

436.Raj, G.V., et al. The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol, 1999. 162: 1238.

437.Taskinen, S., et al. Additional surgery in patients with bladder augmentation. J Pediatr Urol, 2023. 19: 406 e1.

438.Gros, D.A., et al. Urolithiasis in spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 1998. 8 Suppl 1: 68.

439.Shepard, C.L., et al. Urinary tract stone development in patients with myelodysplasia subjected to augmentation cystoplasty. Rev Urol, 2017. 19: 11.

440.Christman, M.S., et al. Morbidity and efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol, 2013. 190: 1479.

441.Ganesan, C., et al. Kidney Stone Events after Kidney Transplant in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023. 18: 777.

442.Harper, J.M., et al. Risk factors for calculus formation in patients with renal transplants. Br J Urol, 1994. 74: 147.

443.Challacombe, B., et al. Multimodal management of urolithiasis in renal transplantation. BJU Int, 2005. 96: 385.

444.Rifaioglu, M.M., et al. Percutaneous management of stones in transplanted kidneys. Urology, 2008. 72: 508.

445.Gupta, M., et al. Treatment of stones associated with complex or anomalous renal anatomy. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 431.

446.Minon Cifuentes, J., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in transplanted kidney. Urology, 1991. 38: 232.

447.Wyatt, J., et al. Treatment outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal allografts. J Endourol, 2009. 23: 1821.

448.Lu, H.F., et al. Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis: early percutaneous management. Urology, 2002. 59: 25.

449.Del Pizzo, J.J., et al. Ureteroscopic evaluation in renal transplant recipients. J Endourol, 1998. 12: 135.

450.Basiri, A., et al. Ureteroscopic management of urological complications after renal transplantation. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2006. 40: 53.

451.Reeves, T., et al. Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol, 2019. 29: 548.

452.Cerrato, C., et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med, 2023. 12.

453.Garcia Rojo, E., et al. Real-world Global Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Anomalous Kidneys: A High Volume International Multicenter Study. Urology, 2022. 159: 41.

454.Parkhomenko, E., et al. Percutaneous Management of Stone Containing Calyceal Diverticula: Associated Factors and Outcomes. J Urol, 2017. 198: 864.

455.Bas, O., et al. Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 155.

456.Gaur, D.D. Retroperitoneal endoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience in 12 patients. J Endourol, 1993. 7: 501.

457.Gaur, D.D., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol, 1994. 151: 927.

458.Lavan, L., et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review. World J Urol, 2020. 38: 1135.

459.Chen, H., et al. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Urol Int, 2019. 103: 249.

460.Yi, X., et al. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Urolithiasis in Horseshoe Kidney Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg, 2021. 8: 726233.

461.Salvi, M., et al. Active treatment of renal stones in pelvic ectopic kidney: systematic review of literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2020. 72: 691.

462.Skolarikos, A., et al. Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 5.

463.Ward, J.B., et al. Pediatric Urinary Stone Disease in the United States: The Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urology, 2019. 129: 180.

464.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Epidemiologic insights into pediatric kidney stone disease. Urol Res, 2010. 38: 453.

465.Alfandary, H., et al. Increasing Prevalence of Nephrolithiasis in Association with Increased Body Mass Index in Children: A Population Based Study. J Urol, 2018. 199: 1044.

466.Novak, T.E., et al. Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology, 2009. 74: 104.

467.Bevill, M., et al. The Modern Metabolic Stone Evaluation in Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 15.

468.Kovacevic, L., et al. From hypercalciuria to hypocitraturia--a shifting trend in pediatric urolithiasis? J Urol, 2012. 188: 1623.

469.Cambareri, G.M., et al. National multi-institutional cooperative on urolithiasis in children: Age is a significant predictor of urine abnormalities. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 218.

470.Braun, D.A., et al. Prevalence of Monogenic Causes in Pediatric Patients with Nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016. 11: 664.

471.Kant, A.K., et al. Contributors of water intake in US children and adolescents: associations with dietary and meal characteristics--National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. Am J Clin Nutr, 2010. 92: 887.

472.Cogswell, M.E., et al. Vital signs: sodium intake among U.S. school-aged children - 2009-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2014. 63: 789.

473.Clark, M.A., et al. Nutritional quality of the diets of US public school children and the role of the school meal programs. J Am Diet Assoc, 2009. 109: S44.

474.Andrioli, V., et al. Infant nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis: Natural history and predictors of surgical intervention. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 355 e1.

475.Sas, D.J., et al. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of children with nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 241.

476.Telli, O., et al. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting? Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 853.

477.Dos Santos, J., et al. Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children. J Urol, 2016. 195: 1289.

478.Dincel, N., et al. Are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Pediatr Surg, 2013. 48: 840.

479.Barreto, L., et al. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018. 6: CD010784.

480.Sun, F., et al. Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of alpha-Adrenergic Blockers for Pediatric Urolithiasis in the Distal Ureter. Front Pediatr, 2022. 10: 809914.

481.Ziaeefar, P., et al. Medical Expulsive Therapy for Pediatric Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Med, 2023. 12.

482.Lu, P., et al. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2015. 43: 199.

483.Dogan, H.S., et al. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 84 e1.

484.Alsagheer, G., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 515 e1.

485.Zeng, G., et al. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res, 2012. 40: 599.

486.Badawy, A.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol, 2012. 44: 661.

487.Jee, J.Y., et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric and adolescent urolithiasis. Korean J Urol, 2013. 54: 865.

488.Cevik, B., et al. Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 363.

489.Kumar, A., et al. A Single Center Experience Comparing Miniperc and Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Radiopaque 1-2 cm Lower Caliceal Renal Calculi in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Endourol, 2015. 29: 805.

490.Wang, H.H., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children’s hospitals. J Urol, 2012. 187: 1402.

491.Jurkiewicz, B., et al. Ureterolithotripsy in a paediatric population: a single institution’s experience. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 171.

492.Elsheemy, M.S., et al. Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in children: predictive factors for complications and success. World J Urol, 2014. 32: 985.

493.Ishii, H., et al. Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: a systematic review. BJU Int, 2015. 115: 867.

494.Tanriverdi, O., et al. Comparison of ureteroscopic procedures with rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes in pediatric population: does the caliber of instrument matter? Pediatr Surg Int, 2010. 26: 733.

495.Dogan, H.S., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol, 2011. 186: 1035.

496.Gokce, M.I., et al. Effect of Prestenting on Success and Complication Rates of Ureterorenoscopy in Pediatric Population. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 850.

497.Ellison, J.S., et al. Risk factors for repeat surgical intervention in pediatric nephrolithiasis: A Pediatric Health Information System database study. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 245 e1.

498.Unsal, A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Surg, 2011. 46: 2195.

499.Erkurt, B., et al. Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children. Urolithiasis, 2014. 42: 241.

500.Suliman, A., et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy to treat upper urinary tract stones in children. Urolithiasis, 2020. 48: 57.

501.Xiao, J., et al. Treatment of upper urinary tract stones with flexible ureteroscopy in children. Can Urol Assoc J, 2019. 13: E78.

502.Tiryaki, T., et al. Ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral stones in children: factors influencing the outcome. Urology, 2013. 81: 1047.

503.Lim, E.J., et al. Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 1223.

504.Mokhless, I.A., et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol, 2014. 191: 1496.

505.Saad, K.S., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Large Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol, 2015. 194: 1716.

506.Pelit, E.S., et al. Comparison of Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Preschool-aged Children. Urology, 2017. 101: 21.

507.Bas, O., et al. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderately Sized Pediatric Kidney Stones. J Endourol, 2016. 30: 765.

508.Chen, Y., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 189.

509.Cicekbilek, I., et al. Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: assessment by quantitative SPECT of (99m)Tc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys. Ren Fail, 2015. 37: 1118.

510.Celik, H., et al. Comparison of the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy with different sized instruments. Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 203.

511.Dombrovskiy, V., et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: Analysis of Nationwide Hospitalizations and Short-Term Outcomes for the United States, 2001-2014. J Endourol, 2018. 32: 912.

512.Senocak, C., et al. Predictive factors of bleeding among pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis, 2018. 46: 383.

513.Jones, P., et al. Role of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques-Micro and Ultra-Mini PCNL (<15F) in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 816.

514.Guven, S., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int, 2013. 111: 148.

515.Onal, B., et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol, 2014. 191: 777.

516.Aghamir, S.M., et al. Comparing Bleeding Complications of Double and Single Access Totally Tubeless PCNL: Is It Safe to Obtain More Accesses? Urol Int, 2016. 96: 73.

517.Iqbal, N., et al. Comparison of outcomes of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study. Turk J Urol, 2018. 44: 56.

518.Samad, L., et al. Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children cause significant renal scarring? J Pediatr Urol, 2007. 3: 36.

519.Modi, P.K., et al. Pediatric hospitalizations for upper urinary tract calculi: Epidemiological and treatment trends in the United States, 2001-2014. J Pediatr Urol, 2018. 14: 13 e1.

520.Agrawal, V., et al. Laparoscopic management of pediatric renal and ureteric stones. J Pediatr Urol, 2013. 9: 230.

521.Srivastava, A., et al. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in Children: With and Without Stent - Initial Tertiary Care Center Experience with More Than 1-Year Follow-Up. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2017. 27: 150.

522.Lee, R.S., et al. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol, 2007. 177: 2306.

523.Dai, J.C., et al. National Trends in CT Utilization and Estimated CT-related Radiation Exposure in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Stone Patients. Urology, 2019. 133: 50.

524.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures: IAEA-SEGUR study. J Radiol Prot, 2020. 40.

525.Yecies, T., et al. Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology. Can J Urol, 2018. 25: 9154.

526.Jindal, T. The risk of radiation exposure to assisting staff in urological procedures: a literature review. Urol Nurs, 2013. 33: 136.

527.Vassileva, J., et al. Radiation Exposure of Surgical Team During Endourological Procedures: International Atomic Energy Agency-South-Eastern European Group for Urolithiasis Research Study. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 574.

528.Pierce, D.A., et al. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res, 2000. 154: 178.

529.Preston, D.L., et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res, 2007. 168: 1.

530.Pearce, M.S., et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 2012. 380: 499.

531.Mathews, J.D., et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ, 2013. 346: f2360.

532.Berrington de Gonzalez, A., et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med, 2009. 169: 2071.

533.Brenner, D.J., et al. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med, 2007. 357: 2277.

534.Wrixon, A.D. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot, 2008. 28: 161.

535.Kim, C.H., et al. Are Urologists Performing Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Safe From Radiation Exposure? A Guidance to Reduce the Radiation Dose. Urology, 2016. 95: 54.

536.Singh, V., et al. Prospective randomized comparison between fluoroscopy-guided ureteroscopy versus ureteroscopy with real-time ultrasonography for the management of ureteral stones. Urol Ann, 2016. 8: 418.

537.Mohey, A., et al. Fluoroless-ureteroscopy for definitive management of distal ureteral calculi: randomized controlled trial. Can J Urol, 2018. 25: 9205.

538.Parks, J.H., et al. A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 2002. 167: 1607.

539.Nayan, M., et al. Variations between two 24-hour urine collections in patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic. Can Urol Assoc J, 2012. 6: 30.

540.Cameron, M., et al. The diurnal variation in urine acidification differs between normal individuals and uric acid stone formers. Kidney Int, 2012. 81: 1123.

541.Bobulescu, I.A., et al. Net Acid Excretion and Urinary Organic Anions in Idiopathic Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2019. 14: 411.

542.Cameron, M.A., et al. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 335.

543.Ferraz, R.R., et al. Preservation of urine samples for metabolic evaluation of stone-forming patients. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 329.

544.Capolongo, G., et al. Fasting versus 24-h urine pH in the evaluation of nephrolithiasis. Urol Res, 2011. 39: 367.

545.Gambaro, G., et al. Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement. J Nephrol, 2016. 29: 715.

546.Porowski, T., et al. Assessment of lithogenic risk in children based on a morning spot urine sample. J Urol, 2010. 184: 2103.

547.Tiselius, H.G. Metabolic evaluation and therapy. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 545.

548.Norman, R.W., et al. When should patients with symptomatic urinary stone disease be evaluated metabolically? J Urol, 1984. 132: 1137.

549.D., A., Urine evaluation (in: Evaluation of the stone former), in 2ND International Consultation on Stone Disease, H.M. Assimos D. Chew B, Hautmann R, Holmes R, Williams J, Wolf JS, Editor. 2007, Health Publications.

550.Tiselius, H.G. Standardized estimate of the ion activity product of calcium oxalate in urine from renal stone formers. Eur Urol, 1989. 16: 48.

551.Ackermann, D., et al. Use of the computer program EQUIL to estimate pH in model solutions and human urine. Urol Res, 1989. 17: 157.

552.Kavanagh, J.P., et al. Why does the Bonn Risk Index discriminate between calcium oxalate stone formers and healthy controls? J Urol, 2006. 175: 766.

553.Rodgers AL, A.-H.S., Jackson GE., JESS: What can it teach us?, in Proceedings of Renal Stone Disease 1st Annual International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, 2-3 November 2006., J.L.a.J.W. AP Evan, Jr, Editor. 2007, American Institute of Physics: Melville, New York

554.Sakhaee, K. Epidemiology and clinical pathophysiology of uric acid kidney stones. J Nephrol, 2014. 27: 241.

555.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol, 2010. 25: 403.

556.Sarica, K., et al. The effect of calcium channel blockers on stone regrowth and recurrence after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2006. 34: 184.

557.Fink, H.A., et al. Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline. Ann Intern Med, 2013. 158: 535.

558.Borghi, L., et al. Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol, 1996. 155: 839.

559.Bao, Y., et al. Water for preventing urinary stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012: CD004292.

560.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Effect of water composition and timing of ingestion on urinary lithogenic profile in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover trial. J Nephrol, 2021. 34: 875.

561.Siener, R., et al. Dietary risk factors for hyperoxaluria in calcium oxalate stone formers. Kidney Int, 2003. 63: 1037.

562.Barghouthy, Y., et al. Role of Citrus Fruit Juices in Prevention of Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 2021. 13.

563.Wabner, C.L., et al. Effect of orange juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 1993. 149: 1405.

564.Gettman, M.T., et al. Effect of cranberry juice consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol, 2005. 174: 590.

565.Shuster, J., et al. Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: a randomized prevention trial. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992. 45: 911.

566.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Soda and other beverages and the risk of kidney stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1389.

567.Barghouthy, Y., et al. Tea and coffee consumption and the risk of urinary stones-a systematic review of the epidemiological data. World J Urol, 2021. 39: 2895.

568.Kocvara, R., et al. A prospective study of nonmedical prophylaxis after a first kidney stone. BJU Int, 1999. 84: 393.

569.Hess, B., et al. Effects of a ‘common sense diet’ on urinary composition and supersaturation in patients with idiopathic calcium urolithiasis. Eur Urol, 1999. 36: 136.

570.Barghouthy, Y., et al. The Relationship between Modern Fad Diets and Kidney Stone Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature. Nutrients, 2021. 13.

571.Ebisuno, S., et al. Results of long-term rice bran treatment on stone recurrence in hypercalciuric patients. Br J Urol, 1991. 67: 237.

572.Hiatt, R.A., et al. Randomized controlled trial of a low animal protein, high fiber diet in the prevention of recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones. Am J Epidemiol, 1996. 144: 25.

573.Dussol, B., et al. A randomized trial of low-animal-protein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephron Clin Pract, 2008. 110: c185.

574.Turney, B.W., et al. Diet and risk of kidney stones in the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Eur J Epidemiol, 2014. 29: 363.

575.Asplin, J.R. The management of patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 33.

576.Ferraro, P.M., et al. Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Vitamin C Intake and Risk of Incident Kidney Stones. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016. 67: 400.

577.Fink, H.A., et al. Diet, fluid, or supplements for secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol, 2009. 56: 72.

578.Borghi, L., et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346: 77.

579.Curhan, G.C., et al. Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med, 1997. 126: 497.

580.von Unruh, G.E., et al. Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004. 15: 1567.

581.Harris, S.S., et al. Effects of Hydration and Calcium Supplementation on Urine Calcium Concentration in Healthy Postmenopausal Women. J Am Coll Nutr, 2015. 34: 340.

582.B., E., Hyperuricosuric calcium stone disease, in Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, F.M. Coe FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM, Editor. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

583.Coe, F.L. Hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1980. 128: 439.

584.Siener, R., et al. The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res, 2004. 12: 106.

585.Geraghty, R., et al. Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 2020. 10: e032094.

586.Chang, C.W., et al. Metabolic Syndrome Increases the Risk of Kidney Stone Disease: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pers Med, 2021. 11.

587.Pearle, M.S., et al., Medical management of urolithiasis. 2nd International consultation on Stone Disease, ed. K.S. Denstedt J. 2008.

588.Barcelo, P., et al. Randomized double-blind study of potassium citrate in idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 150: 1761.

589.Hofbauer, J., et al. Alkali citrate prophylaxis in idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate urolithiasis--a prospective randomized study. Br J Urol, 1994. 73: 362.

590.Ettinger, B., et al. Potassium-magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1997. 158: 2069.

591.Lojanapiwat, B., et al. Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol, 2011. 37: 611.

592.Phillips, R., et al. Citrate salts for preventing and treating calcium containing kidney stones in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015. 2015: CD010057.

593.Favus, M.J., et al. The effects of allopurinol treatment on stone formation on hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate stone-formers. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 1980. 53: 265.

594.Ettinger, B., et al. Randomized trial of allopurinol in the prevention of calcium oxalate calculi. N Engl J Med, 1986. 315: 1386.

595.Smith, M.J. Placebo versus allopurinol for renal calculi. J Urol, 1977. 117: 690.

596.Pearle, M.S., et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials for medical prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 679.

597.Gupta, M., et al. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Idiopathic Hyperoxaluria Treatments. J Endourol, 2021. 35: 1844.

598.Cohen, T.D., et al. Clinical effect of captopril on the formation and growth of cystine calculi. J Urol, 1995. 154: 164.

599.Coulthard, M.G., et al. The treatment of cystinuria with captopril. Am J Kidney Dis, 1995. 25: 661.

600.Goldfarb, D.S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of febuxostat versus allopurinol or placebo in individuals with higher urinary uric acid excretion and calcium stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013. 8: 1960.

601.Nouvenne, A., et al. New pharmacologic approach to patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis and high uricosuria: Febuxostat vs allopurinol. A pilot study. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2013. 24: e64.

602.Jarrar, K., et al. Struvite stones: long term follow up under metaphylaxis. Ann Urol (Paris), 1996. 30: 112.

603.Ettinger, B., et al. Chlorthalidone reduces calcium oxalate calculous recurrence but magnesium hydroxide does not. J Urol, 1988. 139: 679.

604.Prien, E.L., Sr., et al. Magnesium oxide-pyridoxine therapy for recurrent calcium oxalate calculi. J Urol, 1974. 112: 509.

605.Pinheiro, V.B., et al. The effect of sodium bicarbonate upon urinary citrate excretion in calcium stone formers. Urology, 2013. 82: 33.

606.Hoppe, B., et al. The primary hyperoxalurias. Kidney Int, 2009. 75: 1264.

607.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens, 1998. 11: 46.

608.Madore, F., et al. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998. 32: 802.

609.Borghi, L., et al. Randomized prospective study of a nonthiazide diuretic, indapamide, in preventing calcium stone recurrences. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 1993. 22 Suppl 6: S78.

610.Brocks, P., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium stones? Lancet, 1981. 2: 124.

611.Mortensen, J.T., et al. Thiazides in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent idiopathic kidney stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1986. 18: 265.

612.Laerum, E., et al. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis. A double-blind study in general practice. Acta Med Scand, 1984. 215: 383.

613.Ohkawa, M., et al. Thiazide treatment for calcium urolithiasis in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Br J Urol, 1992. 69: 571.

614.Scholz, D., et al. Double-blind study with thiazide in recurrent calcium lithiasis. J Urol, 1982. 128: 903.

615.Nicar, M.J., et al. Use of potassium citrate as potassium supplement during thiazide therapy of calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1984. 131: 430.

616.Fernandez-Rodriguez, A., et al. [The role of thiazides in the prophylaxis of recurrent calcium lithiasis]. Actas Urol Esp, 2006. 30: 305.

617.Dolin, D.J., et al. Effect of cystine-binding thiol drugs on urinary cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. J Endourol, 2005. 19: 429.

618.Chow, G.K., et al. Medical treatment of cystinuria: results of contemporary clinical practice. J Urol, 1996. 156: 1576.

619.Pak, C.Y., et al. Management of cystine nephrolithiasis with alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine. J Urol, 1986. 136: 1003.

620.Tekin, A., et al. Cystine calculi in children: the results of a metabolic evaluation and response to medical therapy. J Urol, 2001. 165: 2328.

621.Pedersen, S.A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer: A nationwide case-control study from Denmark. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018. 78: 673.

622.Pottegard, A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use is strongly associated with risk of lip cancer. J Intern Med, 2017. 282: 322.

623.Pottegard, A., et al. Association of Hydrochlorothiazide Use and Risk of Malignant Melanoma. JAMA Intern Med, 2018. 178: 1120.

624.Worcester, E.M., et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of idiopathic hypercalciuria. Semin Nephrol, 2008. 28: 120.

625.Curhan, G.C., et al. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med, 1993. 328: 833.

626.Wolf, H., et al. Do thiazides prevent recurrent idiopathic renal calcium oxalate stones? Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, 1983. 20: 477.

627.Johansson, G., et al. Effects of magnesium hydroxide in renal stone disease. J Am Coll Nutr, 1982. 1: 179.

628.Khan, S.R., et al. Magnesium oxide administration and prevention of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 1993. 149: 412.

629.Solak, V., et al. Potassium citrate vs. hydrochlorothiazide to reduce urinary calcium excretion in calcium oxalate stone patients with hypercalciuria: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2021. 53: 1791.

630.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide and Prevention of Kidney-Stone Recurrence. N Engl J Med, 2023. 388: 781.

631.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Efficacy of standard and low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the recurrence prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis (NOSTONE trial): protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BMC Nephrol, 2018. 19: 349.

632.Hesse, A., et al. Causes of phosphate stone formation and the importance of metaphylaxis by urinary acidification: a review. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 308.

633.Silverberg, S.J., et al. A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med, 1999. 341: 1249.

634.Mollerup, C.L., et al. Risk of renal stone events in primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroid surgery: controlled retrospective follow up study. BMJ, 2002. 325: 807.

635.Evan, A.E., et al. Histopathology and surgical anatomy of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and calcium phosphate stones. Kidney Int, 2008. 74: 223.

636.Verheyen, N., et al. Cinacalcet hydrochloride for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2013. 14: 793.

637.Rizzato, G., et al. Nephrolithiasis as a presenting feature of chronic sarcoidosis: a prospective study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 1996. 13: 167.

638.Garrelfs, S.F., et al. Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1. N Engl J Med, 2021. 384: 1216.

639.Groothoff, J.W., et al. Clinical practice recommendations for primary hyperoxaluria: an expert consensus statement from ERKNet and OxalEurope. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2023. 19: 194.

640.Takei, K., et al. Oral calcium supplement decreases urinary oxalate excretion in patients with enteric hyperoxaluria. Urol Int, 1998. 61: 192.

641.Hoppe, B., et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with secondary hyperoxaluria. Front Biosci, 2003. 8: e437.

642.Prezioso, D., et al. Dietary treatment of urinary risk factors for renal stone formation. A review of CLU Working Group. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2015. 87: 105.

643.Domrongkitchaiporn, S., et al. Dosage of potassium citrate in the correction of urinary abnormalities in pediatric distal renal tubular acidosis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002. 39: 383.

644.AP., M. Genetic renal abnormalities. Medicine, 2007. 35: 386.

645.Sromicki, J., et al. Prospective long-term evaluation of incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis diagnosed by low-dose NH(4)CL loading - gender prevalences and impact of alkali treatment. J Nephrol, 2022. 35: 1619.

646.Dhayat, N.A., et al. Furosemide/Fludrocortisone Test and Clinical Parameters to Diagnose Incomplete Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis in Kidney Stone Formers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017. 12: 1507.

647.Oliveira, B., et al. Genetic, pathophysiological, and clinical aspects of nephrocalcinosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2016. 311: F1243.

648.Mandel, N.S., et al. Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J Urol, 1989. 142: 1516.

649.Kim, S., et al. Development of Nephrolithiasis in Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis, 2017. 70: 173.

650.Millman, S., et al. Pathogenesis and clinical course of mixed calcium oxalate and uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int, 1982. 22: 366.

651.Pak, C.Y., et al. Biochemical distinction between hyperuricosuric calcium urolithiasis and gouty diathesis. Urology, 2002. 60: 789.

652.Chou, Y.H., et al. Clinical study of ammonium acid urate urolithiasis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012. 28: 259.

653.Wagner, C.A., et al. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol, 2010. 23 Suppl 16: S165.

654.Coe, F.L., et al. Kidney stone disease. J Clin Invest, 2005. 115: 2598.

655.Miano, R., et al. Stones and urinary tract infections. Urol Int, 2007. 79 Suppl 1: 32.

656.Rodman JS, S.E., Lopez ML., Diagnosis and treatment of uric acid calculi., in Kidney Stones. Medical and Surgical Management, F.M. Coe FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM., Editor. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

657.Low, R.K., et al. Uric acid-related nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am, 1997. 24: 135.

658.Shekarriz, B., et al. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: current concepts and controversies. J Urol, 2002. 168: 1307.

659.Wilcox, W.R., et al. Solubility of uric acid and monosodium urate. Med Biol Eng, 1972. 10: 522.

660.Mattle, D., et al. Preventive treatment of nephrolithiasis with alkali citrate--a critical review. Urol Res, 2005. 33: 73.

661.Marchini, G.S., et al. Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1334.

662.Kramer, G., et al. Role of bacteria in the development of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10: 35.

663.Gettman, M.T., et al. Struvite stones: diagnosis and current treatment concepts. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 653.

664.Wall, I., et al. Biochemical risk factors in patients with renal staghorn stone disease. Urology, 1986. 28: 377.

665.Akagashi, K., et al. Characteristics of patients with staghorn calculi in our experience. Int J Urol, 2004. 11: 276.

666.Amaro, C.R., et al. Metabolic investigation of patients with staghorn calculus: is it necessary? Int Braz J Urol, 2009. 35: 658.

667.Resnick, M.I., et al. Bilateral staghorn calculi--patient evaluation and management. J Urol, 1980. 123: 338.

668.Kristensen, C., et al. Reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypercalciuria in primary struvite nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int, 1987. 32: 749.

669.Iqbal, M.W., et al. Should metabolic evaluation be performed in patients with struvite stones? Urolithiasis, 2017. 45: 185.

670.Bichler, K.H., et al. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2002. 19: 488.

671.Carpentier, X., et al. Relationships between carbonation rate of carbapatite and morphologic characteristics of calcium phosphate stones and etiology. Urology, 2009. 73: 968.

672.Thompson, R.B., et al. Bacteriology of infected stones. Urology, 1973. 2: 627.

673.McLean, R.J., et al. The ecology and pathogenicity of urease-producing bacteria in the urinary tract. Crit Rev Microbiol, 1988. 16: 37.

674.Wong HY, R.C., Griffith DP., Medical management and prevention of struvite stones, in Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, Coe & F.M. FL, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM., Editors. 1996, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia.

675.Wall, I., et al. Long-term acidification of urine in patients treated for infected renal stones. Urol Int, 1990. 45: 336.

676.Griffith, D.P., et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of Lithostat (acetohydroxamic acid) in the palliative treatment of infection-induced urinary calculi. Eur Urol, 1991. 20: 243.

677.Williams, J.J., et al. A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med, 1984. 311: 760.

678.Leusmann, D.B., et al. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1990. 24: 205.

679.Milliner, D.S., et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc, 1993. 68: 241.

680.Prot-Bertoye, C., et al. CKD and Its Risk Factors among Patients with Cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015. 10: 842.

681.Kum, F., et al. Hypertension and renal impairment in patients with cystinuria: findings from a specialist cystinuria centre. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 357.

682.Ferraro, P.M., et al. When to suspect a genetic disorder in a patient with renal stones, and why. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013. 28: 811.

683.Rogers, A., et al. Management of cystinuria. Urol Clin North Am, 2007. 34: 347.

684.Dello Strologo, L., et al. Comparison between SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 cystinuria patients and carriers: a need for a new classification. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002. 13: 2547.

685.Lee, W.S., et al. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human kidney cDNA involved in cystine, dibasic, and neutral amino acid transport. J Clin Invest, 1993. 91: 1959.

686.Daudon, M., et al. Cystine crystal volume determination: a useful tool in the management of cystinuric patients. Urol Res, 2003. 31: 207.

687.Malieckal, D.A., et al. Effect of increasing doses of cystine-binding thiol drugs on cystine capacity in patients with cystinuria. Urolithiasis, 2019. 47: 549.

688.Nakagawa, Y., et al. Clinical use of cystine supersaturation measurements. J Urol, 2000. 164: 1481.

689.Fjellstedt, E., et al. Cystine analyses of separate day and night urine as a basis for the management of patients with homozygous cystinuria. Urol Res, 2001. 29: 303.

690.Ng, C.S., et al. Contemporary management of cystinuria. J Endourol, 1999. 13: 647.

691.Knoll, T., et al. Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol, 2005. 20: 19.

692.Biyani, C.S., et al. Cystinuria—Diagnosis and Management. EAU-EBU Update Series, 2006. 4: 175.

693.Prot-Bertoye, C., et al. Adverse events associated with currently used medical treatments for cystinuria and treatment goals: results from a series of 442 patients in France. BJU Int, 2019. 124: 849.

694.Runolfsdottir, H.L., et al. Urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, carriers and healthy control subjects. Mol Genet Metab, 2019. 128: 144.

695.Edvardsson, V.O., et al. Comparison of the effect of allopurinol and febuxostat on urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency (APRTd): A clinical trial. Eur J Intern Med, 2018. 48: 75.

696.Matlaga, B.R., et al. Drug-induced urinary calculi. Rev Urol, 2003. 5: 227.

697.Beltrami, P., et al. The endourological treatment of renal matrix stones. Urol Int, 2014. 93: 394.

698.Finocchiaro, R., et al. Usefulness of cyanide-nitroprusside test in detecting incomplete recessive heterozygotes for cystinuria: a standardized dilution procedure. Urol Res, 1998. 26: 401.

699.Nakagawa, Y., et al. A modified cyanide-nitroprusside method for quantifying urinary cystine concentration that corrects for creatinine interference. Clin Chim Acta, 1999. 289: 57.

700.Li, S., et al. Effect of stone composition on surgical stone recurrence: single center longitudinal analysis. Can J Urol, 2021. 28: 10744.

701.Schwartz, B.F., et al. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am, 2000. 27: 333.

702.Kum, F., et al. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999-2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int, 2016. 118: 140.

703.Ramello, A., et al. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol, 2000. 13 Suppl 3: S45.

704.Halstead, S.B. Epidemiology of bladder stone of children: precipitating events. Urolithiasis, 2016. 44: 101.

705.Takasaki, E., et al. Chemical compositions of 300 lower urinary tract calculi and associated disorders in the urinary tract. Urol Int, 1995. 54: 89.

706.Naqvi, S.A., et al. Bladder stone disease in children: clinical studies. J Pak Med Assoc, 1984. 34: 94.

707.Philippou, P., et al. The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology. Urology, 2012. 79: 980.

708.Lal, B., et al. Childhood Bladder Stones-an Endemic Disease of Developing Countries. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2015. 27: 17.

709.Douenias, R., et al. Predisposing factors in bladder calculi. Review of 100 cases. Urology, 1991. 37: 240.

710.Smith, J.M., et al. Vesical stone: The clinical features of 652 cases. Ir Med J, 1975. 68: 85.

711.Millan-Rodriguez, F., et al. Urodynamic findings before and after noninvasive management of bladder calculi. BJU Int, 2004. 93: 1267.

712.Yang, X., et al. The value of respective urodynamic parameters for evaluating the occurrence of complications linked to benign prostatic enlargement. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014. 46: 1761.

713.Childs, M.A., et al. Pathogenesis of bladder calculi in the presence of urinary stasis. J Urol, 2013. 189: 1347.

714.Krambeck, A.E., et al. Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1105.

715.Mebust, W.K., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. 1989. J Urol, 2002. 167: 999.

716.Adegeest, C.Y., et al. Influence of severity and level of injury on the occurrence of complications during the subacute and chronic stage of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine, 2022. 36: 632.

717.Kohler-Ockmore, J., et al. Long-term catheterization of the bladder: prevalence and morbidity. Br J Urol, 1996. 77: 347.

718.Kim, J.W., et al. Intravesical prostatic protrusion is a risk factor for bladder stone in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 2014. 84: 1026.

719.Huang, W., et al. Risk factors for bladder calculi in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017. 96: e7728.

720.Bansal, A., et al. Prospective randomized comparison of three endoscopic modalities used in treatment of bladder stones. Urologia, 2016. 83: 87.

721.Kawahara, T., et al. Correlation between the operation time using two different power settings of a Ho: YAG laser: laser power doesn’t influence lithotripsy time. BMC Res Notes, 2013. 6: 80.

722.Liu, G., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy: An effective treatment for bladder stones with urethral strictures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2016. 9: 19907.

723.Soliman, N.A., et al. Endemic bladder calculi in children. Pediatr Nephrol, 2017. 32: 1489.

724.Aurora, A.L., et al. Bladder stone disease of childhood. II. A clinico-pathological study. Acta Paediatr Scand, 1970. 59: 385.

725.Valyasevi, A., et al. Studies of bladder stone disease in Thailand. VI. Urinary studies in children, 2-10 years old, resident in a hypo- and hyperendemic area. Am J Clin Nutr, 1967. 20: 1362.

726.Al-Marhoon, M.S., et al. Comparison of endourological and open cystolithotomy in the management of bladder stones in children. J Urol, 2009. 181: 2684.

727.Linsenmeyer, M.A., et al. Accuracy of bladder stone detection using abdominal x-ray after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2004. 27: 438.

728.Bakin, S., et al. Accuracy of ultrasound versus computed tomography urogram in detecting urinary tract calculi. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 2015. 70: 238.

729.Ahmed, F.O., et al. A comparison between transabdominal ultrasonographic and cystourethroscopy findings in adult Sudanese patients presenting with haematuria. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015. 47: 223.

730.Babjuk, M., et al., EAU Guidelines on Non-musle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and CIS), in European Association of Urology Guidelines 2022 edition. 2022, The European Association of Urology: Arnhem, The Netherlands.

731.Johnson, E.K., et al. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Urology, 2011. 78: 662.

732.Protection, R. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007. 37: 2.

733.O’Connor, R.C., et al. Nonsurgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with bladder calculi. Urology, 2002. 60: 288.

734.Rodman, J.S., et al. Dissolution of uric acid calculi. J Urol, 1984. 131: 1039.

735.Lopez, J.R., et al. Irrigating solutions in bladder stone dissolution. Drug Intell Clin Pharm, 1987. 21: 872.

736.Donaldson, J.F., et al. Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel. Eur Urol, 2019. 76: 352.

737.Rattan, K.N., et al. Catheterless and drainless open suprapubic cystolithotomy in children: a safe procedure. Pediatr Surg Int, 2006. 22: 255.

738.Ullah, S., et al. Comparison of open vesicolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2007. 23: 47.

739.Gou, L., et al. Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg, 2021. 21: 448.

740.Wu, J.H., et al. Combined usage of Ho:YAG laser with monopolar resectoscope in the treatment of bladder stone and bladder outlet obstruction. Pak J Med Sci, 2014. 30: 908.

741.Halis, F., et al. The comparison of percutaneous and transurethral cystolithotripsy methods simultaneously performed with Transurethral Resection of Prostate in patients with BPH and bladder stone. KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019. 51: 189.

742.Razvi, H.A., et al. Management of vesical calculi: comparison of lithotripsy devices. J Endourol, 1996. 10: 559.

743.Ercil, H., et al. Comparison of Ho:Yag laser and pneumatic lithotripsy combined with transurethral prostatectomy in high burden bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg, 2016. 39: 238.

744.Lv, J., et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of holmium laser treatment of bladder stones. Transl Androl Urol, 2021. 10: 3465.

745.Javanmard, B., et al. Surgical Management of Vesical Stones in Children: A Comparison Between Open Cystolithotomy, Percutaneous Cystolithotomy and Transurethral Cystolithotripsy With Holmium-YAG Laser. J Lasers Med Sci, 2018. 9: 183.

746.Gangkak, G., et al. Pneumatic cystolithotripsy versus holmium:yag laser cystolithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones: a prospective randomized study. Pediatr Surg Int, 2016. 32: 609.

747.Abd, Z.H., et al. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children. J Clin Med, 2022. 11.

748.Davis, N.F., et al. Treatment outcomes of bladder stones in children with intact bladders in developing countries: A systematic review of >1000 cases on behalf of the European Association of Urology Bladder Stones Guideline panel. J Pediatr Urol, 2022. 18: 132.

749.Shahat, A.A., et al. A randomised trial comparing transurethral to percutaneous cystolithotripsy in boys. BJU Int, 2022. 130: 254.

750.Ali, M., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic cystolitholapaxy in the management of patients presenting with calcular acute urinary retention: a randomised controlled trial. World J Urol, 2019. 37: 879.

751.Deswanto, I.A., et al. Management of bladder stones: the move towards non-invasive treatment. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 2017. 26: 128.

752.Bhatia, V., et al. A comparative study of cystolithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 1994. 26: 26.

753.Rizvi, S.A., et al. Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: experience with 1,440 children. J Urol, 2003. 169: 634.

754.Autorino, R., et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol, 2015. 68: 86.

755.Matei, D.V., et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int, 2012. 110: E972.

756.Philippou, P., et al. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology, 2011. 78: 43.

757.Hasan, A.M., et al. Synchronous transurethral cystolitholapaxy and TURP reveals better results than transurethral cystolitholapaxy plus medical therapy for BPH: a randomized prospective study on 100 patients with concomitant urinary bladder stone(s) and BPH. World J Urol, 2022. 40: 483.

758.Guo, R.Q., et al. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2017. 33: 144.

759.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in a High-Volume Center: The Impact of Concomitant Holmium Laser Cystolitholapaxy. J Endourol, 2019. 33: 564.

760.Tangpaitoon, T., et al. Does Cystolitholapaxy at the Time of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Affect Outcomes? Urology, 2017. 99: 192.

761.Romero-Otero, J., et al. Critical analysis of a multicentric experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes and complications of 10 years of routine clinical practice. BJU Int, 2020. 126: 177.

762.Chen, Y., et al. Bladder stone incidence in persons with spinal cord injury: determinants and trends, 1973-1996. Urology, 2001. 58: 665.

763.Hall, M.K., et al. Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage. Urology, 1989. 34: 126.

764.DeVivo, M.J., et al. The risk of bladder calculi in patients with spinal cord injuries. Arch Intern Med, 1985. 145: 428.

765.Ord, J., et al. Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol, 2003. 170: 1734.

766.Bartel, P., et al. Bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term study. Spinal Cord, 2014. 52: 295.

767.Chen, H., et al. AB208. Can bladder irrigation reduce the morbidity of bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury? Translational Andrology and Urology, 2016. 5: AB208.

768.Awad, S.A., et al. Long-term results and complications of augmentation ileocystoplasty for idiopathic urge incontinence in women. Br J Urol, 1998. 81: 569.

769.Blyth, B., et al. Lithogenic properties of enterocystoplasty. J Urol, 1992. 148: 575.

770.Flood, H.D., et al. Long-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urology. Neurourol Urodyn, 1995. 14: 297.

771.Hayashi, Y., et al. Review of 86 patients with myelodysplasia and neurogenic bladder who underwent sigmoidocolocystoplasty and were followed more than 10 years. J Urol, 2006. 176: 1806.

772.Husmann, D.A. Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol, 2016. 5: 3.

773.Nurse, D.E., et al. Stones in enterocystoplasties. Br J Urol, 1996. 77: 684.

774.Shekarriz, B., et al. Surgical complications of bladder augmentation: Comparison between various enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology, 2000. 55: 123.

775.Welk, B., et al. Population based assessment of enterocystoplasty complications in adults. J Urol, 2012. 188: 464.

776.Zhang, H., et al. Bladder stone formation after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: statistical analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr Surg, 2005. 40: 407.

777.Szymanski, K.M., et al. Additional Surgeries after Bladder Augmentation in Patients with Spina Bifida in the 21st Century. J Urol, 2020. 203: 1207.

778.DeFoor, W., et al. Bladder calculi after augmentation cystoplasty: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Urol, 2004. 172: 1964.

779.Hanna, M.K., et al. Challenges in salvaging urinary continence following failed bladder exstrophy repair in a developing country. J Pediatr Urol, 2017. 13: 270 e1.

780.Inouye, B.M., et al. Urologic complications of major genitourinary reconstruction in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 680.

781.Lima, S.V., et al. Nonsecretory intestinocystoplasty: a 15-year prospective study of 183 patients. J Urol, 2008. 179: 1113.

782.Metcalfe, P.D., et al. What is the need for additional bladder surgery after bladder augmentation in childhood? J Urol, 2006. 176: 1801.

783.Novak, T.E., et al. Complications of complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic versus nonneurogenic bladder--is there a difference? J Urol, 2008. 180: 2629.

784.Surer, I., et al. Continent urinary diversion and the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol, 2003. 169: 1102.

785.Palmer, L.S., et al. Urolithiasis in children following augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol, 1993. 150: 726.

786.Kronner, K.M., et al. Bladder calculi in the pediatric augmented bladder. J Urol, 1998. 160: 1096.

787.Silver, R.I., et al. Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol, 1997. 158: 1322.

788.Ross, J.P.J., et al. Pediatric bladder augmentation - Panacea or Pandora’s box? Can Urol Assoc J, 2020. 14: E251.

789.Kaefer, M., et al. Reservoir calculi: a comparison of reservoirs constructed from stomach and other enteric segments. J Urol, 1998. 160: 2187.

790.Wang, K., et al. Complications after sigmoidocolocystoplasty: Review of 100 cases at one institution. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1999. 34: 1672.

791.Wagstaff, K.E., et al. Blood and urine analysis in patients with intestinal bladders. Br J Urol, 1991. 68: 311.

792.Breda, A., et al. Percutaneous cystolithotomy for calculi in reconstructed bladders: initial UCLA experience. J Urol, 2010. 183: 1989.

793.Kisku, S., et al. Bladder calculi in the augmented bladder: a follow-up study of 160 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Urol, 2015. 11: 66 e1.

794.Szymanski, K.M., et al. Cutting for stone in augmented bladders-what is the risk of recurrence and is it impacted by treatment modality? J Urol, 2014. 191: 1375.

795.Schlomer, B.J., et al. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol, 2014. 10: 1043.

796.Turk, T.M., et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduit or continent urinary diversion. World J Urol, 1999. 17: 305.

797.Knap, M.M., et al. Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2004. 38: 153.

798.Arai, Y., et al. Orthotopic ileal neobladder in male patients: functional outcomes of 66 cases. Int J Urol, 1999. 6: 388.

799.Badawy, A.A., et al. Orthotopic diversion after cystectomy in women: A single-centre experience with a 10-year follow-up. Arab J Urol, 2011. 9: 267.

800.Ji, H., et al. Identification and management of emptying failure in male patients with orthotopic neobladders after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology, 2010. 76: 644.

801.Madbouly, K. Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery. Urol Ann, 2010. 2: 96.

802.Miyake, H., et al. Experience with various types of orthotopic neobladder in Japanese men: long-term follow-up. Urol Int, 2010. 84: 34.

803.Moeen, A.M., et al. Management of neobladder complications: endoscopy comes first. Scand J Urol, 2017. 51: 146.

804.Simon, J., et al. Neobladder emptying failure in males: incidence, etiology and therapeutic options. J Urol, 2006. 176: 1468.

805.Stein, J.P., et al. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 patients. J Urol, 2004. 172: 584.

806.Miyake, H., et al. Orthotopic sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: assessment of complications, functional outcomes and quality of life in 82 Japanese patients. BJU Int, 2010. 106: 412.

807.Khalil, F., et al. Long-term follow-up after ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz I pouch): A retrospective study of a monocentric experience. Arab J Urol, 2015. 13: 245.

808.Marien, T., et al. Characterization of Urolithiasis in Patients Following Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction with Intestinal Segments. J Endourol, 2017. 31: 217.

809.Davis, W.B., et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided access for the treatment of calculi in continent urinary reservoirs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2002. 25: 119.

810.Paez, E., et al. Percutaneous treatment of calculi in reconstructed bladder. J Endourol, 2007. 21: 334.

811.La Vecchia, C., et al. Genital and urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer. Cancer Res, 1991. 51: 629.

812.Chung, S.D., et al. A case-control study on the association between bladder cancer and prior bladder calculus. BMC Cancer, 2013. 13: 117.

813.Jhamb, M., et al. Urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control, 2007. 18: 839.