4. STAGING & PROGNOSIS
4.1. Staging
The 2016 Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended to assess the anatomical extent of the disease (Table 1) [28].
Table 1: TNM classification for testicular cancer (adapted from UICC, 2016, 8th edn.) [28]
TNM classification for testicular cancer | ||||
pT - Primary Tumour1 | ||||
pTX | Primary tumour cannot be assessed (see note1) | |||
pT0 | No evidence of primary tumour (e.g., histological scar in testis) | |||
pTis | Intratubular germ cell neoplasia (carcinoma in situ)+ | |||
pT1 | Tumour limited to testis (including rete testis) and epididymis without vascular/lymphatic invasion and without invasion of the epididymis*# | |||
pT2 | Tumour limited to testis with vascular/lymphatic invasion, or invading hilar soft tissue or the epididymis or tumour extending through tunica albuginea with involvement of visceral tunica vaginalis**# | |||
pT3 | Tumour invades spermatic cord with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion** | |||
pT4 | Tumour invades scrotum with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion | |||
N - Regional Lymph Nodes – Clinical | ||||
NX | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed | |||
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |||
N1 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass 2 cm or less in greatest dimension or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension | |||
N2 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension; or more than 5 nodes positive, none more than 5 cm; or evidence of extranodal extension of tumour | |||
N3 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 5 cm in greatest dimension | |||
Pn - Regional Lymph Nodes – Pathological | ||||
pNX | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed | |||
pN0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |||
pN1 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass 2 cm or less in greatest dimension and 5 or fewer positive nodes, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension | |||
pN2 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension; or more than 5 nodes positive, none more than 5 cm; or evidence of extranodal extension of tumour | |||
pN3 | Metastasis with a lymph node mass more than 5 cm in greatest dimension | |||
M - Distant Metastasis | ||||
MX | Distant metastasis cannot be assessed | |||
M0 | No distant metastasis | |||
M1 | Distant metastasis ** | |||
M1a Non-regional lymph node(s) or lung metastasis | ||||
M1b Distant metastasis other than non-regional lymph nodes and lung | ||||
S - Serum Tumour Markers (Pre-chemotherapy) | ||||
SX | Serum marker studies not available or not performed | |||
S0 | Serum marker study levels within normal limits | |||
LDH (U/l) < 1.5 x N and 1.5-10 x N or > 10 x N or | hCG (mIU/mL) < 5,000 and 5,000-50,000 or > 50,000 or | AFP (ng/mL) < 1,000 1,000-10,000 > 10,000 | ||
S1 S2 S3 | ||||
N indicates the upper limit of normal.
LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; hCG = human chorionic gonadotrophin; AFP = alpha-fetoprotein.
1 Except for pTis and pT4, where radical orchidectomy is not always necessary for classification purposes, the extent of the primary tumour is assessed in the radical orchidectomy specimen; see pT. In other circumstances, TX is used if no radical orchidectomy has been performed.+ The current “Carcinoma in situ” nomenclature is replaced by GCNIS.
* AJCC eighth edition subdivides T1 Pure Seminoma by T1a and T1b depending on size no greater than 3 cm or greater than 3 cm in greatest dimension [29]
** AJCC eighth edition considers hilar soft tissue invasion and epididymal invasion as pT2, while the discontinuous involvement of the spermatic cord is considered as pM1 [29]
# As updated in the UICC 8th Edition Errata [28b]
4.2. The Union for International Cancer Control prognostic groups
According to the 2016 TNM classification, the following prognostic groups are defined:
Table 2: Prognostic groups for testicular cancer (UICC, 2016, 8th edn.) [28]
Stage grouping | T | N | M | S |
Stage 0 | pTis | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage I | pT1-T4 | N0 | M0 | SX |
Stage IA | pT1 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage IB | pT2 - pT4 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage IS | Any pT/TX | N0 | M0 | S1-3 |
Stage II | Any pT/TX | N1-N3 | M0 | SX |
Stage IIA | Any pT/TX | N1 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N1 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIB | Any pT/TX | N2 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N2 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIC | Any pT/TX | N3 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/TX | N3 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage III | Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | SX |
Stage IIIA | Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S0 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S1 | |
Stage IIIB | Any pT/TX | N1-N3 | M0 | S2 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S2 | |
Stage IIIC | Any pT/TX | N1-N3 | M0 | S3 |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1a | S3 | |
Any pT/TX | Any N | M1b | Any S |
Prognostic groups for testicular cancer | |
Stage IA: | Primary tumours limited to the testis and epididymis, with no evidence of microscopic vascular or lymphatic invasion by tumour cells on microscopy, no sign of metastases on clinical examination or imaging, and post-orchidectomy serum tumour marker levels within normal limits. Marker decline in patients with Clinical Stage I (CS I) disease should be assessed until normalisation occurs on two consecutive measurements. |
Stage IB: | More locally invasive primary tumour, but no sign of metastatic disease. |
Stage IS: | Following orchiectomy tumour markers increase, remain persistently elevated or fail to decline as expected by half-lives indicating the presence of subclinical metastatic disease. The presence of a second GCT in the contralateral testis should also be excluded. |
In population-based patient series from developed countries, 75-80% of seminoma germ cell tumour (SGCT) patients, and 55-64% of NSGCT patients had CS I disease at diagnosis [30,31]. True CS I, i.e., persistently elevated or increasing serum tumour marker levels after radical orchidectomy, was found in approximately 5% of NSGCT patients [30].
4.3. Risk factors for relapse in clinical stage I testicular cancer
4.3.1. Seminoma
Primary testicular tumor size and stromal invasion of the rete testis have been considered the prognostic risk factors associated with relapse in CS I (SGCT). Two SRs assessed the prognostic value of both risk factors [32,33]. While tumour size (continuous or dichotomised) and rete testis invasion (RTI) were associated with a higher risk of relapse, both SRs highlighted the low quality of the studies included and concluded that the level of evidence was too low justify the use of both risk factors to drive adjuvant treatment decisions in routine practice.
Recently, two large series re-assessed prognostic risk factors in CS I SCGT patients under surveillance [34,35]. A multi-institutional retrospective series including 1,016 patients and an additional validation cohort of 285 patients identified primary testicular tumour size (size < 2 cm, 2-5 cm, and > 5), RTI (pagetoid + stromal invasion) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) to be associated with risk of relapse [34]. A three-tier risk stratification was compiled, including a small proportion of high-risk patients (2.3%) with tumour size > 5 cm and both RTI and LVI present who had a five-year cumulative probability of relapse of 44%.
A large prospective series from Denmark [35] including 924 patients with central pathology review identified invasion of the testicular hilum (rete testis and hilar soft tissue), LVI, and elevated β-HCG and LDH prior to orchiectomy as independent predictors of relapse. In contrast to previous studies, tumour size was not identified as a risk factor. A six-tier risk stratification was developed and the estimated five-year probability of relapse ranged from 6% in patients without risk factors to 62% in patients with all four risk factors, which was 22% of the patient population. Both series demonstrated that the vast majority of patients with CS I SGCT are cured by orchiectomy alone as the overall relapse rate was 14.7% and 16%, supporting “active surveillance” (AS) as the preferred adjuvant strategy for all CS I seminoma patients irrespective of risk factors.
4.3.2. NSGCT
For CS I NSGCT, invasion of the primary tumour into blood or lymphatic vessels, (i.e., lymphovascular invasion [LVI]), has long been described to be strongly associated with the risk of relapse [39-41]. According to historical figures, relapse risk for patients with LVI-positive tumours was 50% vs. 15% in patients with LVI-negative tumours.
A recent Danish study of more than 400 patients with central pathology review suggested tumour size, invasion of the hilar soft tissue and presence of embryonal carcinoma as additional risk factors [36]. Depending on the combination of factors, relapse risk ranged from < 5% to > 85%.
4.4. The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification for the prognostic risk groups of metastatic germ cell cancer
The 1997 IGCCCG defined a prognostic risk-factor system for metastatic GCT based on identification of clinically independent adverse factors [37]. The classification has been revalidated on a contemporary cohort of metastatic TGCTs treated with cisplatin/etoposide based first-line chemotherapy [38].
Compared to the 1997 figures, the five-year progression-free survival (PFS) of NSGCT patients was unchanged for good- and intermediate-risk, but significantly improved for poor-risk patients (from 41% to 54%). The five-year overall survival (OS) was substantially better for all groups. In addition to the traditional components of the IGCCCG risk-prognostic groups previously described, older age (linear association) and lung metastases were confirmed as negative factors for PFS [38].
For SGCT, revalidation of the IGCCCG classification showed that the five-year PFS increased to 89% and 79% in good- and intermediate-risk patients with corresponding OS rates of 95% and 88%. Testicular lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) over 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was identified as a possible adverse prognostic factor in regard to reduced three-year PFS; however, overall three-year survival was not affected [39].
Table 3: Prognostic-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancer (IGCCCG) [37]*
Good-prognosis group | |
NSGCT 5-year PFS 90% 5-year survival 96% | All of the following criteria:
|
SGTC 5-year PFS 89% 5-year survival 95% | All of the following criteria:
|
Intermediate-prognosis group | |
NSGCT 5-year PFS 78% 5-year survival 89% | Any of the following criteria:
|
SGCT 5-year PFS 79% 5-year survival 88% | All of the following criteria:
|
Poor-prognosis group | |
NSGCT 5-year PFS 54% 5-year survival 67% | Any of the following criteria:
|
SGCT | No patients classified as poor-prognosis |
* Pre-chemotherapy serum tumour markers should be assessed immediately prior to the administration of chemotherapy (same day).
AFP = alpha-fetoprotein; β-hCG = human chorionic gonadotrophin; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; PFS = progression-free survival.